• Metawish
    link
    fedilink
    53 years ago

    All I know, is that any whole number is probably more that what is currently spent, and any amount would make a significant difference.

  • Maya
    link
    fedilink
    43 years ago

    … I dunno, keep pouring and I’ll say when

  • ufra
    link
    fedilink
    33 years ago

    Not including Military & Co. , 5 to 7 percent seems reasonable considering innovative tech companies spend triple that.

  • Dessalines
    link
    fedilink
    23 years ago

    Lets say 10 people in an economy (maybe in reality this could be 1 person = 10 million person-years, so a country with 100 million working ppl):

    • 5 on consumer goods
    • 3 on social services
    • 1 on research & development
    • 1 on defense
    • poVoq
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      10% on defense spending? That’s insanely high. Even the US only spends 3.2% of GDP directly on “defense”.

      A Swiss like preparation for guerilla warfare that pretty much makes an invasion impossible (but no attack capabilities) is really cheap and much preferable.

      P.S.: And you forgot about primary production ;)

    • @tronk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      23 years ago

      This is a lot of money, but I like it. Especially if it’s aimed at improving our lives through equity, inclusion, and sustainable growth.

  • SubversivoB
    link
    fedilink
    13 years ago

    A peripheral economies must push the bar and get a higher percentage. But as the economy grows, the percentage can go down a little, as the absolute value is already big. But the real question is “What R&D?”. A low budget on public health is preferable to a high on mining industry for a poor country.

      • @peppermint@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        -13 years ago
        1. in my country tax is a way for the government to rob it’s citizens. the less paid the better.
        2. government is bad at supervising research, unless you have a specialised agency like DARPA, therefore see 3.
        3. it depends more on human resources than the amount of money you spend on it. give 50% GDP to a bunch of civil servants with 60% of them havong unfinished primary school education they will spend half of it on drying a local river. the other half will be cleaned by that very same river.