why do we need those pesky schools if children can learn everything from work?

  • Arsen6331 ☭
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    Oh yeah, this again. The guardian actually changed the headline after this somehow caused a lot of outrage. I wonder why people would get mad at something like this. Who knows?

  • @Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    Ayup. We’re starting to get similar crap in Russia as well. Recently a law proposition was offered to Gosduma to permit children aged 14 or higher to work without the written consent of the child protection services.

      • @Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Good question. I’d say it’s possible. The government has already pushed several unpopular acts - i.e. raising of the retirement age, monetisation of privileges (for the lack of a better term) for pensioners, introduction of “orthodoxy lessons” in schools, etc. If served properly (i.e. to prevent children from mucking about and getting into drugs and politics) I can kind of see it being popular. Not to mention the possibility of selling it to children themselves as an act of independence.

        • Preston Maness ☭
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          If served properly (i.e. to prevent children from mucking about and getting into drugs and politics) I can kind of see it being popular. Not to mention the possibility of selling it to children themselves as an act of independence.

          Hey now! Drugs cost money! What better way to earn that money legitimately than to engage in child labour?

  • “AKs and mercenary warlords are expensive. What if we just brainwashed their children into exploitation”

    Who are these assholes convincing? Who would just accept this fate willingly?

  • stasis
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    of course this article is supported by the gates foundation

  • Arthur Besse
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    i thought this headline couldn’t possibly be something the guardian actually published, but: here it is. they later edited the headline now to replace “doesn’t have to be” with “is”, but the original headline seen in the screenshot lives on in the URL. (I also confirmed that it isn’t one of those CMSes that ignores the last part of the URL - if you change anything it does become a 404.)

    amazing.