6·
1 day agoIt’s because it’s got Roman in the name, isn’t it?
also Calibri is a humanist sans-serif font
Arthur Besse
cultural reviewer and dabbler in stylistic premonitions
- 600 Posts
- 815 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
Cake day: January 17th, 2022
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
2·6 days agoAI code will likely get to the point where it is just a higher level language
7·8 days agoMuch respect to Nick for fighting for eleven years against the gag order he received, but i’m disappointed that he is now selling this service with cryptography theater privacy features.
contradictory to existing laws (eg section 230).
Section 230 is US law; this article is about the EU and GDPR.
Operating in multiple countries often requires dealing with contradictory laws.
But yeah, in this case it also seems unfeasible. As the article says:
There is simply no way to comply with the law under this ruling.
In such a world, the only options are to ignore it, shut down EU operations, or geoblock the EU entirely. I assume most platforms will simply ignore it—and hope that enforcement will be selective enough that they won’t face the full force of this ruling. But that’s a hell of a way to run the internet, where companies just cross their fingers and hope they don’t get picked for an enforcement action that could destroy them.
a summary can be helpfull
No. LLMs can’t reliably summarize without inserting made-up things, which your now-deleted comment (which can still be read in the modlog here) is a great example of. I’m not going to waste my time reading the whole thing to see how much is right or wrong but it literally fabricated a nonexistent URL 😂
Please don’t ever post an LLM summary again.
Not really. The decision only states that a service that allows to publish advertisements with personal information must review these
Did you post this after reading only the beginning of the article? Because, around the middle of it, the author foresees and responds to your comment:
Some people have said that this ruling isn’t so bad, because the ruling is about advertisements and because it’s talking about “sensitive personal data.” But it’s difficult to see how either of those things limit this ruling at all.
There’s nothing inherently in the law or the ruling that limits its conclusions to “advertisements.” The same underlying factors would apply to any third party content on any website that is subject to the GDPR.
As for the “sensitive personal data” part, that makes little difference because sites will have to scan all content before anything is posted to guarantee no “sensitive personal data” is included and then accurately determine what a court might later deem to be such sensitive personal data. That means it’s highly likely that any website that tries to comply under this ruling will block a ton of content on the off chance that maybe that content will be deemed sensitive.
Here are some relevant parts of what the court actually wrote:
67 In the present case, it is apparent from the order for reference that Russmedia publishes advertisements on its online marketplace for its own commercial purposes. In that regard, the general terms and conditions of use of that marketplace give Russmedia considerable freedom to exploit the information published on that marketplace. In particular, according to the information provided by the referring court, Russmedia reserves the right to use published content, distribute it, transmit it, reproduce it, modify it, translate it, transfer it to partners and remove it at any time, without the need for any ‘valid’ reason for so doing. Russmedia therefore publishes the personal data contained in the advertisements not on behalf of the user advertisers, or not solely on their behalf, but processes and can exploit those data for its own advertising and commercial purposes.
68 Consequently, it must be held that Russmedia exerted influence, for its own purposes, over the publication on the internet of the personal data of the applicant in the main proceedings and therefore participated in the determination of the purposes of that publication and thus of the processing at issue.
It seems to me that the fact that the nature of the content was itself advertising is not the relevant thing here, but rather the fact that the website had a commercial purpose is. So, maybe this will only apply to websites operated for commercial purposes? 🤔
(I am not a lawyer…)
A company that publishes ads for sexual services without getting confirmation of consent is a risk for the society and this business model should not be allowed.
Is there something I missed which indicates that the sexual nature of the advertisement was a factor in the court’s decision?
2·9 days agoDid you miss that OP mentioned they’re blind?
Here is that image you posted, but with manually-written alt text added.
(I don’t usually do this when adding alt tags but in this case I also added the same text as a title/tooltip to make it also easy to read for users without a screen reader. Apologies to screen reader users that this probably causes you to hear the description twice.)
613·9 days agosee also: Conscription of people with disabilities. It’s ongoing in present-day Ukraine.
Phew! I am extremely relieved to find out those videos are fake.
It’s pretty fucked up of TikTok to have tricked us like that, but I’m sure under Larry Ellison’s new leadership they’ll sort things out.
she released a second version ten years later
31·21 days agothey were just solid colored without symbols
you are describing a tile-based game other than mahjong
i checked their website to see if these are real; disappointingly they are not. they do actually have a “conductor’s coal” scent, though.
1·30 days agoI haven’t heard of academics and/or media from China advocating for applications of phrenology/physiognomy or other related racist pseudosciences. Have you?
Plastic surgery would become more popular.
One of the paper’s authors had the same thought:
“Suppose this type of technology gets used in labor market screening, or maybe dating markets,” Shue muses. “Going forward, you could imagine a reaction in which people then start modifying their pictures to look a certain way. Or they could modify their actual faces through cosmetic procedures.”
She also bizarrely says that:
“we are very much not advocating that this technology be used by firms as part of their hiring process.”
and yet, for some reason:
The next step for Shue and her colleagues is to explore whether certain personality types are drawn to specific industries or whether those personality types are more likely to succeed within given industries.
Microchess was first commercially available in 1976, but chess software was being published long before that.
See also: https://www.chessprogramming.org/History#Famous_Historic_Computers_and_Programs