Feel free to use this a megathread for the US/Israeli war on Iran.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I can’t help but shake my head at how the media is covering this. Footage of Iranian Americans celebrating in the streets? I understand their jubilation at an objectively horrible piece of shit getting killed, lord knows I’ll be dancing in the streets when Trump meets his fate, but that elation over finally ridding Iran of the ayatollah came at the cost of over 80 innocent children’s lives. To kill a guy who didn’t have long left to live anyway… those kids had their entire lives ahead of them.

    Not to mention the white house repeating over and over again that this won’t be a other 20 year was like Iraq, but they haven’t specified their endgame. If their goal was regime change, they will ultimately fail without boots on the ground to enforce it, and that’s not going to be a walk on the park like Trump and Miller think. Khamenei’s second in command will just take over and business will resume as usual, or things may possibly get worse with someone less predictable in charge.

    Horribly irresponsible to do this without congressional approval and without even bothering to make the sell to the American people. Iran is not just going to let this go - war is now inevitable.

    • QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s sort of a core part of their shield, if great man theory wasn’t true they’d have to reckon with the global structures of terror they support instead of just blaming putler and the orange man while screaming vote blue no matter who.

  • frippa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Results of the imperialist aggression:

    An 86 year old dead

    150 school children vaporized

    Regime is still there

    American bases in the zone turned to rubble

    Strait of hormuz closed

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Khamenei was the main reason Iran did not develop nuclear weapons up to now. With him gone, that becomes a much more likely scenario.

          • cornishon@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            First of all, they were enriching uranium openly, not covertly, with IAEE monitoring their every move. Unlike Israel which has undeclared and never inspected nuclear arsenal.

            Second, enriching uranium has non-military uses like nuclear medicine (at which Iran is actually a global leader btw).

            And third, well, it’s easier to get 90% enriched uranium from 60% than it is from zero, in case the ruling changes.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Because Iran wasn’t a dictatorship.

            It had factions.

            You know how Iran was always months away from nukes? It was. That was the hard liner faction who believed that only nukes would ensure Iran’s safety wanting to be able to quickly have one if the fatwa was removed.

            Did you not know this? If not, you should stop watching/reading the new sources that didn’t tell you this widely available information. They’re not new sources but propaganda sources.

            • Viceversa@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Because Iran wasn’t a dictatorship.
              It had factions.

              Isn’t ayatollah the supreme leader?

              • Count042@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Isn’t the president the executive branch?

                Jesus Christ, do you have any critical thinking skills?

                • Viceversa@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  As far as I know, ayatollah is entitled to command all leaders of all branches.
                  That’s why he’s called the supreme leader.

                  It’s not true?

        • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          2 days ago

          I feel like its a goal of the MIC as it gives them a reason to exist. Use violence, terror, kill civilians to create more enemies and justify more military spending.

          Not a good long term strategy, but the orphan crushing machine still has people willing to operate it.

          • A🔻atar of 🔻engeance@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            2 days ago

            The US generally benefits from depopulating & undeveloping resource rich or strategically marginal areas for coercion, keeping costs down, denial purposes, or just to keeping value chains stable, but this risks blowing up the petrodollar system. I think they might actually be completely insane. What did WarClaude™ tell them?

          • Pissed@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            You forgot the last bit, when we’ve fucked the whole world up escape to bunker.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 days ago

    Whelp.

    He was 86. I don’t know to what extent he was still in charge. It may have been anywhere from still fully in charge to just a figurehead.

  • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    So the US has taken action against two heads of state in two months, and the rest of the world is not at all worried?

    I mean, if fair is fair, this should be a free-for-all, so I’d be all for Netanyahu, Bbukele and Putin going up in smoke next.

    • A🔻atar of 🔻engeance@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      They are worried, but most of them are maintaining tenuous comprador regimes where their ruling classes’ finances are firmly linked to the imperial core

      • wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        His owners will get rid of him when he is no longer useful. At the moment he is the clown face emoji they all sign themselves off with

      • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        He has to at least answer for his pedophilia before he goes up in smoke. And besides, forget the smoke, I want to see him under the guillotine, his head framed as an example of What Not To Do.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well war over now right? Trump said the goal was regime change. We’ll mission accomplished. Right?

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      In the model of Venezuela as long as the actual top leader isn’t in charge anymore, it’s regime change.

    • mrdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The regime is not one person not to say that trump would not find more excuses if the regime really fall

            • mrdown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              because Iran is the biggest threat to Israel colonial ambition and they do not want another 1979

          • 3abas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            They are not still in place, they buckled and gave America huge concessions that will not serve them long term.

            If Iran’s new leadership says “we won’t attack Israel again, we’ll stop developing weapons to protect ourselves and will only purchase American weapons from now on” that’s when you know the regime changed.

            • mrdown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Iran is like syria not Venezuela. If the regime ever change they will destroy all what is left of the Iranian military capability, arms more iranians factions to fight other factions and occupy part of Iran

              • 3abas@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Yes, I agree totally. I wasn’t saying that’s likely to happen in Iran, I was simply pointing out that Venezuela did have a regime change, a silent coup. The vice president publicly took over and released political prisoners and started cooperating with the CIA and with the US on Venezuela’s energy.