Feel free to use this a megathread for the US/Israeli war on Iran.

    • cornishon@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      First of all, they were enriching uranium openly, not covertly, with IAEE monitoring their every move. Unlike Israel which has undeclared and never inspected nuclear arsenal.

      Second, enriching uranium has non-military uses like nuclear medicine (at which Iran is actually a global leader btw).

      And third, well, it’s easier to get 90% enriched uranium from 60% than it is from zero, in case the ruling changes.

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because Iran wasn’t a dictatorship.

      It had factions.

      You know how Iran was always months away from nukes? It was. That was the hard liner faction who believed that only nukes would ensure Iran’s safety wanting to be able to quickly have one if the fatwa was removed.

      Did you not know this? If not, you should stop watching/reading the new sources that didn’t tell you this widely available information. They’re not new sources but propaganda sources.

      • Viceversa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Because Iran wasn’t a dictatorship.
        It had factions.

        Isn’t ayatollah the supreme leader?

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Isn’t the president the executive branch?

          Jesus Christ, do you have any critical thinking skills?

          • Viceversa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            As far as I know, ayatollah is entitled to command all leaders of all branches.
            That’s why he’s called the supreme leader.

            It’s not true?

            • Count042@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Stop ignoring everything else I wrote you fucking propaganda poisoned jackass.

              • Viceversa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Stop being unnecessarily rude.

                Also: am I right in my point about ayatollah supremacy?

                • Count042@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  No, you’re not.

                  You’re arguing by title to ignore the points made like a sophist. That is explicitly rude, while trying to pretend it isn’t.

                  Bad faith responses deserve nothing other than the reflection of the rudeness they project.

                  • Viceversa@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    I think we disagree.

                    By the way, I’m from Russia, and we have our own “totally not authoritarian” head of just one branch of government.

                    And the ayatollah - he’s effectively the head of all branches, while also having religious authority. It’s very hard to see any democracy here.