• kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    I swear the people who decide what ports go onto laptops have never used a laptop in their life. I know now manufacturers would love to just sell you a dongle add-on or two that plugs into your USB-C port and has all of the other useful ports on it you actually need, but even before then… who needed only 1 USB-A and two lightning cable ports? When was Mini-DVI relevant?

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    26 days ago

    i have to deal with this with work laptops where i don’t get to choose, they gave me a thin one without RJ45 plug, and i suppose to be happy it is nice looking and sleek, but i rather it have beefy cooling

    • Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      Same! Work gave me a Dell laptop, on one side there is a USB-C/TB, on the other side there is 2 USB-C/TB and HDMI. I needed to buy a small usb-c dock with PD, usb-a, second HDMI, RJ45, etc to work with it at home. At least it is easier to unplug and carry.

    • b000rg@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      My work laptop has two USB-A and two USB-C ports, and that’s it. And once of those C’s gets used to charge it. Plus, it’s so thin that the battery lasts an hour and a half just idling on desktop. I’m just glad I mostly work on hardware stuff so I hardly ever have to actually use it.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    26 days ago

    Those book spines are top tier design

    Unlike my game of thrones blu rays which have three motifs.

  • BootLoop@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    26 days ago

    They’ve returned to fatter laptops with more ports. People did not like those thin MacBooks for a number of reasons.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    26 days ago

    I miss thicker netbooks. Easy enough to repair most things, and it had every port you could ever want.

    I hate the new “ultra-light” fashion. Give me thick, durable, powerful, and ported!

      • altasshet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        Same! Personal daily driver for 14 years and counting. You might be able to get USB-C via an Express Card? Haven’t looked into it, but those might exist.

  • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    26 days ago

    Ignoring the fact that this is on par for Apple… (Which does tend to disseminate to other brands due to popularity)

    The only issue I have is the deletion of the dedicated dock port, which should have less wear and tear due to fewer insertion cycles. (you’d only use it at the office, home or otherwise) The other ports being combined into fewer ones is just part of technological evolution toward mobile efficiency. If you are on the go, whether on-site support or between locations, you aren’t going to be lugging around 2-3 monitors; a printer; scanner; etc. You’d normally want something lightweight and easy to manage, so you can be in and out quickly.

    If you don’t move around while working or whatever, a desktop PC should fit all of your connection needs.

  • evujumenuk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    USB-A, FireWire and that video output converged to Thunderbolt, which also means I can connect several displays to e.g. a 2021 MacBook Pro. The separate headphones and microphone jacks got merged as well. After the whole Touch Bar brouhaha, the card reader and HDMI also made their return.

    So the one connector we did lose is Ethernet. Which, to be fair, is a bummer indeed. Luckily, we can easily push 1 Gbps over Wi-Fi nowadays.

      • evujumenuk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        I don’t know, since I didn’t have to specifically buy anything to get that throughput. So, in my case, it cost me nothing.

        It was just an ISP-provided router and an older Mac Studio. I didn’t check but there’s a good chance the wireless link actually supports even higher bandwidth; at the time, I was bottlenecked by the 1 Gbps connection to my ISP.