• DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    264
    ·
    1 month ago

    This leads to the government deciding which websites you can visit and cant visit down the line. This is a dystopian level of control and with surveillance already getting dystopian… Pick your dystopian technology book and decide which one we’re leading towards. Fascism policies are already on the rise in democratic worlds.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 month ago

    political theater. won’t happen because it’s unenforceable.

    • VPNs operate outside of federal control
    • ISPs leverage DNS blocking to censor which is laughable
    • DNS exists outside of the US

    if this does happen, IF, it has nothing to do with IP rights or protecting Americans. it has everything to do with censoring what the majority of common Americans read online. this is the first step towards blocking news outlets that won’t regurgitate whitehouse directives.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m a bit surprised they’ve gone with piracy as an excuse - usually it’s “Think of the children!” Maybe they’ve finally figured out that we already know that republicans are thinking of (molesting) the children so they’ve fallen back on “You wouldn’t download a car”.

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago
      • ISPs leverage DNS blocking to censor

      And blocking the IP address of the site in question, as well. That’s why so many “illegal” sites jump around IP addresses like a flea on a hot griddle. They’re trying to remain accessible whenever the ISP prevents direct access.

      Because if you block the IP address, blocking DNS is superfluous and performative – it’s just window dressing for better optics towards politicians who don’t understand tech. DNS censorship trivially bypassible by using custom DNS servers that aren’t affected by the censorship, while IP blocking hits everyone who is under that ISP regardless of their DNS settings - they need a VPN to bypass IP blocking.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        all that’s going to do is give them an excuse to block IPs outside the US by the block.

        keep an eye on the FCC and any legislation they take against HAM or SDR. without that it would be difficult to have any comms outside the US.

        • rekabis@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          No, IP blocking is widespread in most places, it’s just that “rights holder” lawsuits go after the domain name, first, both in terms of the registrar and DNS. They also force ISPs to block IP addresses, but this is more of a whack-a-mole prospect so it’s usually a second-order method.

    • aim4harmony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      NextDNS is good and I just realised that it’s based in The US. The alternative ones don’t seem to provide the feature of granular filtering.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          i think you have to set up DoH with unbound to make it not be in cleartext? I dunno honestly I’m a dummy, but I’m fairly sure that it’s pretty tricky to get it totally secured. I guess I don’t understand why you can’t use ubound recursively but have its root.hints pointing as something like quad9 instead of all the actual root authoritative dns servers, theres like 13 of them and more than half are the US government.

  • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 month ago

    Like this will ever work. lol. Just don’t get VPN from a company that is headquartered in the US. Problem solved. There are a million other ways to bypass this. There will ALWAYS be away, they’re just trying to make it harder for the experienced, and impossible for your average Joe.

    • gandalfthewhite@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The only way to stop it is buy severing all the cables and blowing up the infrastructure. They aren’t prepared to do that.

      • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Literally. This is not a new “fight”. These corrupt, bribes-ridden fuckers have been “fighting” piracy since the inception of the internet, and they’ve always lost, and always lose.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is the same party that are all for unregulated AI use and no consequences for breaking copyright to train it.

      This bill’s goal is to provide a standardized mechanism to filter sites then start blocking sites that state doesn’t approve.

      It’s same as the other “think of the children” bills of the party that is protecting pedophiles.

  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    We’re just not allowed to use computers in any way that actually benefits us, anymore? Digital prison man.

    • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      In any country. Which is already nudging me in the direction of buying some land and weapons, set up some kind of a farm and let humanity fuck itself however it wants. Big problem though: land and weapons cost way more than I can afford

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    Darrell Issa out of California appears to have proposed this, I assume because he is not seeking re-election.

    Who wants to take a bet he is getting paid for it?

    • vinnymac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      He is getting paid. Not only has the Motion Picture Association contributed to political campaigns but it very recently gave awards and money to two politicians that promote their interests

      For specifics on donations see: https://myreptracker.com/campaign-finance/committees/C00139519/motion-picture-association-inc-political-action-committee-mpaamerica-pac

      In 2025, the MPA gave Chris Coons its Industry Champion Award and also honored Darrell Issa. MPA CEO Charles Rivkin described Coons as a “trusted partner” and praised Issa as a “true partner” on matters important to film and television.

      It’s very basic corruption in broad daylight, and it’s pretty common in US politics today. As far as I know, you can’t prove corruption in court without some form of wiretapping or paper trail, which is trivial for them to avoid. So they’ll never get in trouble for being absolute utter dog shit human beings.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    My ISP wondering why I only ever access 5 servers in Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium and Finland

  • Smaile@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sounds like they want people board and mad, a historically winning combination.