Yeah, I understand what you meant. However, specific language is better to speak of this because of the tendency of people to extrapolate from single facts inappropriately.

The days of orgs having their own email are back in the 90s. As an org, you have 2 choices: M365 or Google Workspace. Anything else is more expensive in time or money.

Canadas First Nations are deeply pro crown

This is a dangerous falsehood. Indigenous ppl get audiences with the crown because their treaties are with the crown, and not with the Federation Government. They are absolutely NOT “pro-crown”.

You should no longer say that.

Surely this wasn’t a surprise to you, when most corporations, schools and school districts, hospitals, and everything else also use MS.

OK, here’s an example:

The low income threshold in Canada is $31,317 (according to stats Canada and the CRA). This entitles Canadians to certain financial aids if their income falls below that above that, people still have access to:

• basic dental
• childcare funding or tax rebates
• food supports
• allowances for children’s sports and arts
• rent supports
• career training and retraining
• poat-scondary education supports

The proposed $33k ubi would indeed match the threshold, but people above this threshold who make 40k or 50k would lose those benefits and have less money. There is a complex system of supports currently in place that interact with taxes, direct funding, and full/partial grants from federal, provincial, and collaborations with nonprofit and charitable organizations. How would these be addressed?

Another problem with UBI in general IS actually the phase-in problem, because we don’t all need the same amount to live comfortably; metropolitan centers have substantially higher living costs than rural areas, but their infrastructure costs per resident are lower than for rural residents because of scale. And this leaves out Northern living, which has its own cost structure altogether. In urban centers, reliance on donated food distribution is higher than it’s ever been, and a lot of those people are on a living allowance of $29k/yr. How would giving them $33k and no food help? How about indigenous communities? Does their funding structure see any change under UBI?

UBI is such a broad-sweeping fiscal change that this transition IS the real obstacle. The issue with making broad claims based on averages like in this manifesto is that we don’t actually live that way. I’m definitely pro-UBI, but it is not an easy problem to solve.

So yes, the manifesto is naive and seems to be founded on a surface-level understanding of human living finances and federal/provincial-level finances in general.

As for the carbon pricing, that is not a realistic take either.

It is predicated on weak or wrong understanding of economy, UBI, carbon pricing, education, etc, etc. It can’t be taken seriously.

The income taxing alone makes no sense as an end goal, proposes no phase-in changes, and generally speaks to a naive and surface-level perception of how taxing works in Canada.

Did you write this manifesto? And if not, did you actually read it?

Always upvote Settlers

Thanks for the write up.

Lemmy prefers markdown, so you can make code blocks on Lemmy with backticks, this is inline code with single backticks at each end of the string, and this is a code block, with three backticks at each end in their own lines:

Block of code
2nd line
3rd line

T’as pas compris le sens de la phrase, y parlais à nous tous, pas à toi.

or ones proxmox could make

In proxmox, ACME is a service for the root CA of the cluster. It does use letsencrypt, but it does not provide certs for clients.

Sounds like you are probably conflating DNS and PKI certificates.

It just previously avoided the bad optics of pulling a gun at their head, just so most people don’t know they’re hostages.

No, we all knew. And the optics were bad.

I use a local ntfy server and uptimekuma, which has built-in support for a ton of notification services, including ntfy.

You can also use the public ntfy server and create a topic there.

Classless interdomain routing is not the point of this post, but basically we started giving people more options for network sizes, and while complex in implementation, it was philosophically virtually uncontroversial.

You’re talking about 2 different things here. Bit masking part of what is now CIDR was implementable since the mid 90s on network segments, it’s the logic to route packets based on CIDR that was integrated into RIP, GRIP, and BGP.

Also, CIDR can’t alleviate multi-hop routing address exhaustion.

This opt out is a positive, likely carved out by litigation, in a very very negative space for privacy rights.

It’s not, it’s less than Google used to do for these requests. In 2009, I requested my house be taken off streetview. They removed it by skipping mine and a few houses on each side.

Then they went down my back lane, so everyone got a good look at my back yard anyway.

Privacy today is a never ending battle, but Google started this nonsense a long time ago.

Yeah, I was pretty militant about it before, but the horse is out of the barn and no amount of head-in-sand will make it go away.

Good effort.

Your grasp of DNS needs some refinement, especially in distinguishing the concepts of IP, routing, and name resolution.

sbin is for system binaries and is for root only. No access by default sudo permissive settings is by design.

100% of the time.

My VPN turns on automatically when I leave my home lan. I don’t use split-tunneling, so all my traffic goes back to home before going to internet.

server side tracking

Is there another kind?