I think im going bin laden
TIL that Hitler isn’t the “Worst” option for everything lol
My three kids are in their 20’s. Assuming there are no weapons involved, I’d say they’re safe with any of them.
Bin Laden, Hitler, and Combs would each have a rough night. Lindsay would probably be ok. If necessary, they could restrain her without injuring her.
I’d pass the Nurnberg check, so Hitler would a solid first-round pick. It’s a toss about who would gendercode my kids more between him and Bin Laden. Lindsay What’s-Her-Name and P. Diddy are automatic no’s.
I don’t know who top left is, but I reckon Bin Laden’s the safe bet here
Bin laden i guess, the other option is a child murderer, a child molester or the corpose of THE nazist soo
Uncle Adi for sure. Osama would be secod pick.
Tbh the biggest danger that would come from having bin Laden babysit your kids is the possibility of them being killed in a drone strike.
All 4. They fight, kids run to neighbors.
Just leave them home alone.
Alternatively, you reckon Osama could teach them basic engineering skills? If they are making phone-activated landmines surely they can put up some fun RF experiments.
Osama was also a regular engineer. That was his day job
He’s also great at hide-and-seek.
Hmm. I think Adolf was not bad to children (or maybe I am missing some information) and debating him would be fun for me, too.
Arabs are usually too patriotic and uninterested in children. Diddy is too diddly. And no idea who top left is.
I think Adolf was not bad to children (or maybe I am missing some information)
I’d argue you’re missing an approximate 1.5 million informations.
debating him would be fun for me, too.
You might even get to shower afterwards! 🚿
I believe you don’t understand how Hitler’s mind worked. He was clearly pro-life, just not pro-every-life. Similar to what happens on a daily basis in a lot of countries. Ethnic cleansing was done because of ethnicity, not because of age.
Also about the concentration camps, I don’t know enough about this part. Was it a clear order and idea of Hitler? Or was the idea to get rid of jews, but the infrastructure was not ready for this amount of people, and thus someone like Goebbels brought the idea of just getting rid of them locally? I remember reading somewhere that at the beginning, they tried to deport the people, but soon realized they were not able to do that in a timely manner.
PS: I had to puke a little describing Hitler as pro-life under the circumstances, unfortunately it is technocally right. He loved people, also children. Just hated jews.
The Wannsee Conference didn’t contain Hitler, but did include many higher ups making the explicit plans for the Shoah. It wasn’t Hitler’s first plan, deportation was, but any reasonable understanding of his long term plans would require eventual extermination. He was invading places he had sent Jewish people to.
Also non-Jewish victims didn’t get the attempted deportation. Disabled Germans, criminals, communists, queer people, etc faced brutal prison labor and eventually extermination.
Ultimately, Hitler didn’t give orders in a way where you can say “he ordered this to happen”. He made his desires clear, and let the party vie for his favor. Had they not orchestrated the Shoah, party members would have been replaced with those who would
Thank you so much for this insightful history lesson!
You took my reply way too seriously.
I’m not a historian so I can’t really debate this. Of course Hitler was selectively pro-life, the whole nazi shit is exactly that (and why many back then didn’t want to see what happened initially - after all the Nazis gave white people “Kraft durch Freude” and holidays for their first time). Same crap happens in the USA right now, and of course many other countries. Though fortunately for democratic US-citizens still fighting the Trump regime is far less competent than the OG Nazis.
“kid-friendly” is a term encompassing all kids though. If you’re unfriendly to some kids you’re not kid-friendly. This applies to nazis, racists, religious assholes, ableists etc. all alike.
I see, that was some neatly placed irony :)
Was it a clear order and idea of Hitler?
Yes.
Your “Yes” made me suspicious. As expected, it is not a clear yes. Historians are not sure what exactly happened. What they know is, that there were many people part of this whole genocide. Heinrich Himmler was responsible for building Dachau, the first concentration camp. Many others were involved afterwards.
Hitler most likely knew about all of this and let it happen. But it is not known if there was ever a clear order from Hitler, or if it was suggested by someone else.
I know for a fact Bin Laden had games and the movie Cars on his computer. Safest bet.
Ugh he’s an arsenal fan.
Not in my house!
Did you see that ludicrous display last night‽
Hwo is on top left and bottom right?
Osama bin Laden loved his kids. He was hard on them, for sure, he was basically what you imagine when you think of a deep south US prepper survivalist - a bit eccentric and paranoid, but intelligent - he would be taking his kids on long hikes, teaching them how to sleep in the desert with only sand as a blanket, but he did it out of a deep desire to protect them and give them skills to survive.
deep south US prepper survivalist
intelligent
sorry, you lost me there
If they’re brown Muslim children
That’s an easy choice. Bin Laden wasn’t even that bad of a guy.
Except he put American and European atheists at the bottom of his hierarchy, so your kids would be far safer with Hitler if they fit any of those denominations
But if they baby isn’t “pure” it wouldn’t be much safer with Hitler
If by “isn’t pure” you mean an immediate parent that was Jew, African or Roma gypsy. Pretty much everyone else was “okay”. Especially inter-Europeans
