I know for a fact Bin Laden had games and the movie Cars on his computer. Safest bet.
Ugh he’s an arsenal fan.
Not in my house!
Did you see that ludicrous display last night‽
The trouble with arsenal is they just like to walk it in.
What was Wenger thinking, sending Walcott on that early?
No lol I just know they have been getting a bunch of hate recently. Were they bad?
Tbh the biggest danger that would come from having bin Laden babysit your kids is the possibility of them being killed in a drone strike.
He went untouched for almost four decades I think they’d all be fine…
TIL that Hitler isn’t the “Worst” option for everything lol
Tbh, I don’t know who the lady is
I think that’s the lady currently on trial for murdering her three kids.
Now I know, and
trial is over. she will likely have another trial. we won’t know until end of Sept when the next hearing for her case is set.
it’s possible a plea deal could be offered, but unlikely.
‘we have had the trial, yes. but what about the second one?’
Woman who recently had a mistrial go viral for being the latest influencer courtroom case. Similar to Depp v Heard. The woman’s name is Lindsay Clancy, I believe.
Notable things (viewing this through the lens of my wife who told me about this case):
- flimsy hard evidence against the mother
- mother allegedly tried to kill herself 3 different ways after snapping and allegedly killing her children while the husband was out of the house
- a lot of the evidence seemed to be hearsay from the husband
- children’s bodies were cremated by the father
- father is suspected of having a mistress because he moved on after this relatively quickly.
- jury trial ended in a hung jury, because 1 juror tried to reverse “12 Angry Men” it to get all other jurors to switch to a Guilty verdict.
- Clancy admitted to the murders initially
My unsolicited opinion is that she very likely did commit the crimes, but the State has insufficient evidence to convict due to the police’s negligence during their investigation.
Lindsay Clancy
She admitted to the murders, but is pleading insanity.
also this guy is spreading lies. the evidence is clear she did it, and she confessed. there was no despute as to her guilt in murdering her children.
the issue is whether she can be held criminally liable for first degree murder. if the charges had been manslaughter or something else, it would have been a slam dunk conviction. but due to her mental state at the time, it’s questionable if she was capable/committed first degree, or premeditated, murder.
but people don’t want to talk about the legal issues in the case… they just want to push the emotional bullshit that she was absolutely innocent, or absolutely guilty, and there can’t be anything in-between. and lots and lots of people like the db0 user commenting here are spreading lies about the case to push their political agenda.
to the point that many of the TikTok moms who support her innocence are working entirely outside of the factual evidence of the case. which is also more evidence of how social media itself is causing psychosis in many folks, as it’s well-documented already how social media amplifies delusional and paranoid thinking.
I was pretty explicit, I think she did it and the state lacks evidence to convict beyond the shadow of doubt.
Sorry if the db0 in my username added some political leaning to my above post. I was trying to be pretty by the numbers as best as I knew.
I didn’t even mention the fact that there’s been a giant push for people to claim that the father committed the murders. It’s pretty far out there for claims.
I know another comment some issues with the way her specific state handles insanity pleas. Of that, I am not too in the know about. So I didn’t mention it.
What the state lacks evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that she was sufficiently sane to be held criminally liable at the time of the murders in the state of Massachusetts. That last bit is important because it’s the only state where the prosecution has to prove sanity rather than the defense having to prove insanity.
Personally I suspect she’s not guilty by reason of insanity, but I’m not certain I’d feel that way beyond a reasonable doubt were I on the trial. And it seems a large portion of people are of the opinion neither side managed to clear the bar of reasonable doubt
I can switch to my Lemmy.World account if you prefer 😅
Fixed. Thanks! Problem with going off the cuff is I am terrible with names.
The husband embezzled donations after skimping on the child’s gravestones.
He fucking set the whole thing up and is getting a free pass because this is what Americia stands for these days.
Osama bin Laden loved his kids. He was hard on them, for sure, he was basically what you imagine when you think of a deep south US prepper survivalist - a bit eccentric and paranoid, but intelligent - he would be taking his kids on long hikes, teaching them how to sleep in the desert with only sand as a blanket, but he did it out of a deep desire to protect them and give them skills to survive.
deep south US prepper survivalist
intelligent
sorry, you lost me there
If they’re brown Muslim children
Osama for sure.
ngl, since im a white, cis, heterosexual, non-jewish, german: probably hitler. i dont think he was the kinda guy that would kill children just because he could. if these children happened to have like, a jewish mother, things would definitely look different
I’m italian so I guess it depends on when on the timeline they plucked him
I’ll check back in a few hours, I have a feeling this’ll be a dumpster fire.
It’s just the “wimmin bad” incel shit from /r/SipsTea being reposted on Lemmy after being posted there every day for the last week.
Surprisingly it’s not that bad. Proud of the lemmings
I don’t know who top left is, but I reckon Bin Laden’s the safe bet here
deleted by creator
I think im going bin laden
Well I’m not jewish…so…
Are you ‘arian’? Cause if not, I’ve got bad news for you
Bin laden it is then, at least he can teach my kid life skills like flying and chemistry
Yeah, I think he’s the only choice for a kid tbh. Even he had standards and his beef was with the us gov not with kids
I mean I kinda figured dude wouldn’t show up being that he’s dead and all…
“Be good kids, Laden be watching you for me”
My three kids are in their 20’s. Assuming there are no weapons involved, I’d say they’re safe with any of them.
Bin Laden, Hitler, and Combs would each have a rough night. Lindsay would probably be ok. If necessary, they could restrain her without injuring her.
Best send them to Bin Laden then because at least they wouldn’t be able to sit up all night raiding the bar.
Osama, easy. He’s a family man and would show absolute respect and kindness towards the child as is the custom of his religion and his culture.
He has nothing against children and has a big household with other kids mine can play with.
My child will also be damn safe there and get great food.
Such an easy contest.
But would they be safe from US bombs?
I mean they were for like 40 years and in the end they got snitched out and took out by a seal team so, probably.
US bombs are more calibrated to hit weddings.
Just leave them home alone.
Alternatively, you reckon Osama could teach them basic engineering skills? If they are making phone-activated landmines surely they can put up some fun RF experiments.
He’s also great at hide-and-seek.
Osama was also a regular engineer. That was his day job
That’s an easy choice. Bin Laden wasn’t even that bad of a guy.
Except he put American and European atheists at the bottom of his hierarchy, so your kids would be far safer with Hitler if they fit any of those denominations
But if they baby isn’t “pure” it wouldn’t be much safer with Hitler
If by “isn’t pure” you mean an immediate parent that was Jew, African or Roma gypsy. Pretty much everyone else was “okay”. Especially inter-Europeans
