• PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    It appears Google tries to degrade alternative application stores to just another app offered through the Play Store, and therefore subject to Google’s policies (including an annual $5,000 fee for policy and security reviews). So I wouldn’t be surprised this is very much intentional: as to force application stores through a channel controlled by Google, to technically allow competition (at Google’s discretion) while ultimately killing “side-loading” through other sources.

    • capital5@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      14 days ago

      Remember when Microsoft was forced to give a “select your web browser” prompt when setting up a Windows computer?

      Quaint times, those were…

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Guys, work on improving Linux phone instead. Google is taking Android away from you and it just isn’t worth arguing with them about it. Let them hang themselves. Build a better alternative.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      The endless challenge is that a phone needs to talk to the phone network. The radio manufacturers are deeply in bed with the surveillance state and they are absolutely opposed to free communication. Which means they will never allow a cell phone radio to work with free software.

      • fxdave@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        13 days ago

        Calling is something that works in e.g. Postmarket OS. The trickier parts are NFC payments, lack of apps. So it comes with huge drawbacks. Some apps can even require that your device is verified by google and you have no way of hijacking it.

        Proprietary camera software is also a huge thing. Software can do so much thing and you pay for the software also, not just the hardware but you lose the software when you install something other than the factory default.

        And battery optimization is very young in desktop grade linux OSes, you won’t get that good battery life as with android.

        • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 days ago

          NFC and battery life are absolutely huge concerns. Cell tower stuff isn’t great either but if you absolutely had to many of us can live without cellular and just do VOIP.

          Apps aren’t that big an issue, waydroid is a thing and the appification of the internet is detrimental anyway. Do it in a browser.

        • darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          For myself I don’t consider NFC payments or the few apps that require device integrity auth. Not everyone falls into this category but a good percentage are. We need more modern open hardware. To the larger software point there is a lot of good Foss software out there even for phones. What we need is a open software center like a flathub that makes them easy to find and deploy.

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’ve said this before, there should be a way to make VPN-Style VM that on the spot/on the fly emulates Android and is tricked into thinking your phone is a certain model gives it all bullshit details or is fuckin’ stupid enough you pay 1$ a year for a service plan that has a bunch of burner androids and you connect to one and your graphene is temporarily using an emulator that is also live connected to the device (like live booting from USB) to use said device’s verified details to trick the android servers into giving you permission to use the apps through graphene on the emulator.

      Idk but at that point you’re better off having a burner android to reverse engineer the apps you want for graphene.

  • UncleObli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Misleading title. After reading the linked Gitlab discussion it’s more likely a backend change from Google side. Aurora does use burner account but early reports seem to suggest they are not flagged or rate limited.

  • Cleisthenian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    14 days ago

    Seems like clickbait but the graphene devs recommend against aurora store in favor of using a second profile with the sandboxed play store

  • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago
    1. GrapheneOS isn’t John Android. Stop black and white thinking. You don’t have to fit in with people when you post to .ml.
    2. If you have read the thread you are posting (relevant message 18 hours ago as opposed to this post 13 hours ago), you would have seen that you can just press “reload accounts” to fix it.
    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      people treating graphene like the only android OS drives me up the fucking wall, i’m sure it’s great but holy SHIT lineage has existed for years and years but… now it’s suddenly irrelevant?

      Leaves a bad taste in my mouth

      • krolden@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Just wait til the next time you’re arrested and the cops easily get into your phone.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 days ago

    It’s working fine for me while logged in. It’s always been crap when logged out. This is nothing new.

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        Install it so I don’t have to have Google Play. Yes, Google can see what apps I have installed, but they don’t have their code running on my device. I consider it a 99% harm reduction.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        for some people maybe, but if that was the whole point of the project then why would they even have the option to log in?

  • plsnerf7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yup can confirm. Some apps return this error (example tutamail and windscribe vpn). Fix it by downloading the apk in fdroid or github/ gitlab directly.

  • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    Well, it took Google long enough to take away this workaround, if you think about it. I wish Alphabet burned in hell, let it be clear.

  • WillieShen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    Aurora still works for me for now on Samsung stock OS. I now mostly install Google Play apps with APKPure over Obtainium tho and only use Aurora for those not on APKPure. And most of my apps are from GitHub/GitLab releases and F-Droid. I disabled Google Play and didn’t login to Google account. I don’t want the requirement of a Google account to install an app and Play Integrity to run an app. It is by no means acceptable that a company, using a closed source implementation that also tracks user and breaks Android security model, can censor what apps a user can install and decide what security and privacy compromises a user needs to agree to just use the normal phone functionalities that they pay for and by no mean require those compromises technically. They are turning Android into a service and a prison like iOS did rather than a software.