How did you learn about it?
- 3 Posts
- 181 Comments
I asked a question. You sure are belligerent. I thought I left the toxicity when I left reddit. Not everything has to be an argument. Chill.
I’d have expected questions about Tuta, or Mailbox. It’s weird for folk to pan something and raise a tool most haven’t heard of.
You’d think due diligence in a privacy community would be a given.
It’s quite common to see in privacy communties a post panning the preferred option then suggesting something new and asking folk about it. It can be a way to get folk aware and talking of your product. It’s subtle atroturfing, but you do see it.
Organically, you’d usually ask what folk use instead.
Never heard of it. Happy with Proton. This feels like a subtle advert.
They look really nice. The poblano looks a bit thick for my tastes. Would prefer jalapeno, but other than that really good.
For extra delicious but unhealthy, frying the buns in the same pan in the fats after both sides until toasted is chef’s kiss.
Examples of countries that have had territory invaded that run elections? I asked for examples because I’d love to see real world examples and not fictional examples from inside someone’s head…
So you assumed I’m an American liberal…
Firstly, I’m not American. I live in Europe. So fail one. Secondly, I’m a Socialist, so fail two. Fuck liberalism, and screw America, but ultimately, that doesn’t mean you have to swallow everything the enemies of American push. Oh, and I’m on Lemmy because I haven’t touched Reddit in a while. You’re the weirdest leftie that is still actively on an enshittified right-wing hell hole and the projection is real crazy. You cannot demand critical analysis from Americans, and fail in it yourself.
Oh, btw, Russia is capitalist, with many, many billionaires. The proletariat are not reaping the benefits of their exploitation.
I live in a world where you can be anti-captalist and not shilling for Russia.
Let’s go back to basics though, if you have a source saying something, you have to ask who said it, and whether they have a motive. Russia Today is the Russian state broadcaster. It’s a really dreadful source to use to understand a war Russia are currently in. I’d suggest you’d find a less biased source, but not too many of them are pushing Russian propaganda.
I’m really curious. How do you run polling stations, where you have to advertise to the public where they are, and to come there, and protect yourself from drone and missile strikes? I really want to understand how you can run elections where you’re being invaded. Can you help me out here? Any examples?
I get really annoyed with Libtards throwing around terms like “tankies” but you’re really kind of walking the ball into your own net (football reference) when you’re shilling this hard for Russia.
RT? As in Russia Today? Complaining that the country they invaded isn’t holding local elections while they’re bombing the shit out of it?
Weirdly, no one has commented on straight up Russian propaganda.
Not many countries hold elections during an active war.
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What exactly is the situation of the Uyghur in China's Xinjiang since 2014 up until now?
16·2 months agoBecause you disagree with them, they’re not credible?
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What exactly is the situation of the Uyghur in China's Xinjiang since 2014 up until now?
215·2 months agoA BBC documentary here demonstrates some evidence of what is shown and what occurs is two different things:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmId2ZP3h0c
There is evidence that isn’t insinuations and it isn’t American.
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What exactly is the situation of the Uyghur in China's Xinjiang since 2014 up until now?
411·2 months agoThere was a really good BBC documentary on this 6 years ago which takes a look in one of the facilities from both and official visit and visiting unannounced. Also using satellite footage to demonstrate changes made prior to journalist visits…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmId2ZP3h0c
High recommend watching it.
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlto
Reddit@lemmy.world•Reddit stock soars as company posts fastest quarterly revenue growth in 3 years
29·4 months agoLosing never felt so good.
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlto
science@lemmy.world•Scientists reportedly hiding AI text prompts in academic papers to receive positive peer reviewsEnglish
1·4 months agoWhat’s to respect in an AI review where they didn’t even review the output. It’s an LLM lazy review. Deserves to be gamed.
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlto
Technology@beehaw.org•Elon Musk’s X obtains $44bn valuation in sharp turnaround
36·8 months agoThat’s a very expensive Nazi bar.
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlto
World News@lemmy.ml•Duterte flown to The Hague after arrest over Philippines drug war killings
111·8 months agoSome Fillipino’s I’ve talked to have commented that drug problems in their area disappeared but used to be pretty horrible.
I’m not one to defend crimes against human’s, but one cannot discount the level of criminality and the impact it was already having on people’s lives. Whether the tactics were fair or decent is one thing, but another is, did it work? Did it solve a serious problem the country was grappling with? You only have to look at Mexico to realise that if you don’t deal with these things, the level of murder and suffering often skyrockets.
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlMto
Open Source@lemmy.ml•Over 3.1 million fake "stars" on GitHub projects used to boost rankings
15·11 months agoYes. You corrected a dyslexic. Well done.
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlMto
Open Source@lemmy.ml•Over 3.1 million fake "stars" on GitHub projects used to boost rankings
3·11 months agoThat is more down to poor marketing. Here on Lemmy or reddit there are big open source communities where you can extol the values of it.
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlMto
Open Source@lemmy.ml•Over 3.1 million fake "stars" on GitHub projects used to boost rankings
102·11 months agoWhy would it be? Software is good based on it’s use and recommendations from real folk, not *s. Many project not on github




Maybe. I thought it was really cool in 2D. But tried the hype one when it became 3D. Was confused with the distinct lack of car focus. Got very bored, very quickly. Quite a meh game.