Easy questions have easy answers, right?

  • @Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    106
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    “I was unemployed”

    • Why?
    • Can they not even keep a job?

    “I took a sabbatical”

    • Mysterious
    • Arousing
    • Shows off the size of your enormous sack

    EDIT : When I took my sabbatical and I was dating at the same time, instead of being seen as a scruffy bum it actually did give an air of mystique, since most people at that age were not doing things like that.

      • @BussyCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        236 days ago

        It depends on the context if you say you had an NDA and can’t elaborate at all on the details that’s a clear red flag as most NDAs you can at least give the context of what it is about I.e. specific job processes, witnesses an event, etc.

        If you say you worked for X company but can’t talk about the details of your work because of an NDA then that’s fine but they might call your old employer to verify you did really work there.

      • @mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        266 days ago

        For the most part, yes. They only really ask the question because they automatically assume you were in jail if you have a gap over 2’ish weeks long. So they’re really just looking for some sort of explanation besides “I was just unemployed for no reason.” Because they assume “no reason” is really “I don’t want to admit that I was in jail.”

        • Bio bronk
          link
          fedilink
          216 days ago

          Lol who tf actually thinks that. Ive hired and never thought that

          • 3DMVR
            link
            fedilink
            English
            106 days ago

            yeah thats a wild assumption, maybe ppl just have enough money to survive for a while and dont want to work while they pursue hobbies, why is that not allowed, nah mustve been in jail

            • @mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              maybe ppl just have enough money to survive for a while and dont want to work while they pursue hobbies

              The issue is that this is exactly what employers are trying to avoid. They want a good little worker bee who will show up every day and complete their tasks as assigned for 25 years straight. They don’t want someone who will just randomly decide to quit and focus on their hobbies. They want stability and predictability, because hiring new workers is a massive expense.

              • 3DMVR
                link
                fedilink
                English
                36 days ago

                Because ppl expect/get more benefits and pay overtime

              • 3DMVR
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 days ago

                I thought it was worse to retain ppl long term and thats why they are constsntly firing ppl?

                • @b000rg@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  66 days ago

                  It’s almost never actually a good business decision in the long-term to lose an employee, unless that employee is actually causing losses. All the layoffs of the past 50ish years from corporate downsizing is thanks to the business philosophy of Jack Welch. When you stop paying a large group of people, it looks good in the next quarterly meeting because you can point at the money you’re saving. The bad part is that now the business A) has lost that productivity, and B) will likely need to spend more money hiring a replacement worker who won’t be as competent.

          • @propaganja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Man, you must live a privileged life if it didn’t even cross your mind that jobs might exist where that is a legitimate concern.

            • Bio bronk
              link
              fedilink
              16 days ago

              What if a small gap on their resume means jail?? What the fuck are you on about

              • @propaganja@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Chill dude. I’m saying that there are jobs that employ people who often have a criminal history, and gaps in their employment record really often are because tey went to jail.

                So, even though you may not interview very many former criminals in your line of work, surely you shouldn’t be at a loss to understand why anyone would ever think that.

                • Bio bronk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  16 days ago

                  Im saying the hiring managers that think that are brain dead

        • Eager Eagle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          106 days ago

          2 weeks is barely enough to get an interview. Who thinks jail? lmao

    • @slappypantsgo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 days ago

      This can also help you filter the lunatics from the normal workplaces. In an interview, I once explained that I couldn’t discuss specifics of my client work because of confidentiality and NDAs, and they kept pushing. It wasn’t even the same industry! There was no obvious competitive advantage.

    • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      186 days ago

      You’d still be asked to provide start and end dates and place of employment if your work was confidential. If the NDA prohibits you from disclosing your employment entirely, it will typically include a restriction against disclosing the existence of the NDA itself.

        • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          56 days ago

          I’d still ask follow-up questions. Was it in the public or private sector? What branch or industry? Were you in a leadership role, part of a team, or working as an individual contributor? What skills did you develop during that employment that would be beneficial to your employment in this role?

          • @Scubus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            26 days ago

            “I cannot answer any of those except the last one, which is that I learned how to avoid questions like these”

    • Camelbeard
      link
      fedilink
      66 days ago

      It was my sabbatical, and be really smug when you say it, like I’m better than you.

    • Psychadelligoat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 days ago

      I totally had a guy catch and call me on that

      “Those 3 months I did consulting for a local elderly care facility, helping them learn some computer basics”

      “Sir, your parents don’t count” without missing a beat. I actually did help other people in that specific chunk he was asking about, but rude lol, and I think that might even be a big part of why I didn’t get that one tbh

  • Pennomi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    547 days ago

    Haha, as if anyone actually asks that. A gap gets you automatically rejected by the employment AI, long before humans see it.

  • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    537 days ago

    FMLA is always a safe bet. Only one available to care for a dying family member buys sympathy and is an area they can’t legally ask any follow-up questions.

    Source: former corporate shill and interviewer

    • TragicNotCute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      407 days ago

      NDAs generally prohibit you from stating that you are under NDA.

      Better to be cryptic “I can’t really go into details due to my clearance”.

  • Lit
    link
    fedilink
    146 days ago

    If i have to explain the gap (which clearly means I was not employed), it means you are incompetent, you fail my interview, I don’t work with incompetent bosses.

    • @Fallofturkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      236 days ago

      That’s pretty much what I said - I took some time off for my family. I was getting called 3-4 times a week between 6pm-5am, often times not being present for them, so I had to make a change or risk losing them. I got the job and don’t get called at night. Win-win all except for those 4 months without paying and stress of resume rewrites and a million applications.

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 days ago

      Yes. I’ve basically said that, not that I’ve had such a rude, direct question from an interviewer.