Easy questions have easy answers, right?

  • @mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 month ago

    For the most part, yes. They only really ask the question because they automatically assume you were in jail if you have a gap over 2’ish weeks long. So they’re really just looking for some sort of explanation besides “I was just unemployed for no reason.” Because they assume “no reason” is really “I don’t want to admit that I was in jail.”

    • Bio bronk
      link
      fedilink
      221 month ago

      Lol who tf actually thinks that. Ive hired and never thought that

      • r.EndTimes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 month ago

        yeah thats a wild assumption, maybe ppl just have enough money to survive for a while and dont want to work while they pursue hobbies, why is that not allowed, nah mustve been in jail

        • @mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          maybe ppl just have enough money to survive for a while and dont want to work while they pursue hobbies

          The issue is that this is exactly what employers are trying to avoid. They want a good little worker bee who will show up every day and complete their tasks as assigned for 25 years straight. They don’t want someone who will just randomly decide to quit and focus on their hobbies. They want stability and predictability, because hiring new workers is a massive expense.

          • r.EndTimes
            link
            fedilink
            English
            330 days ago

            Because ppl expect/get more benefits and pay overtime

          • r.EndTimes
            link
            fedilink
            English
            130 days ago

            I thought it was worse to retain ppl long term and thats why they are constsntly firing ppl?

            • @b000rg@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              630 days ago

              It’s almost never actually a good business decision in the long-term to lose an employee, unless that employee is actually causing losses. All the layoffs of the past 50ish years from corporate downsizing is thanks to the business philosophy of Jack Welch. When you stop paying a large group of people, it looks good in the next quarterly meeting because you can point at the money you’re saving. The bad part is that now the business A) has lost that productivity, and B) will likely need to spend more money hiring a replacement worker who won’t be as competent.

      • @propaganja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        Man, you must live a privileged life if it didn’t even cross your mind that jobs might exist where that is a legitimate concern.

        • Bio bronk
          link
          fedilink
          130 days ago

          What if a small gap on their resume means jail?? What the fuck are you on about

          • @propaganja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            30 days ago

            Chill dude. I’m saying that there are jobs that employ people who often have a criminal history, and gaps in their employment record really often are because tey went to jail.

            So, even though you may not interview very many former criminals in your line of work, surely you shouldn’t be at a loss to understand why anyone would ever think that.

            • Bio bronk
              link
              fedilink
              130 days ago

              Im saying the hiring managers that think that are brain dead

    • Eager Eagle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1030 days ago

      2 weeks is barely enough to get an interview. Who thinks jail? lmao