During the first impressions of said distro, what feature surprised you the most?

  • @mesamunefire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    299 months ago

    Puppy linux seems like its still one of the more unique Linuxes around. Its my go-to when I need to do a recovery for family/friends and seems to almost work with any system. If it can, it will load its entire system into the RAM and go to town. If it cant. then it will act like a live disk…but you can “save” the OS multiple different places. Its a fun little OS.

    • oni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      If you like Puppy, also have a look at Easyos. Created by Puppy’s orginal creator.

      • @FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Ha. Was about to say the same. Running EasyOS on one ofy extra partitions for testing, and I end up using it as semi-daily driver often due to how light it is. Great on a USB key, too.

        It is also somewhat unique, on top of other Puppy distros.

  • mub
    link
    fedilink
    239 months ago

    Endeavour OS

    I’ve tried all the usual distros many times over the years but never an arch based distro until last year. I gave arch a go first and it was great but then tried endeavouros and it came with the fixes I needed and was more instantly good from the first boot. The AUR and arch wiki stuff just makes the whole experience most (sry to use this term) Windows like in terms of fixes and support.

  • @warmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    209 months ago

    The entire Ublue project is freaking amazing. But Bazzite finished off my distrohopping. I work by day and game by night. Bazzite has eliminated all maintenance tasks for me. It just works. It makes things so damn easy. Also, the Ublue CI/CD builds is crazy cool. It allows them to focus on the important stuff, while all the chores are done automatically. Truly amazing stuff. I also heard lots of praise about the dev oriented spin: Bluefin.

    • @chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      I started on Bazzite as my first real Linux desktop. After a while I rebased to Aurora (Bluefin but KDE instead of Gnome) and I really liked it. I ended up rebasing back to Bazzite for a while.

      My only issue is around a very specific piece of software that has issues with Wayland. That’s why all the rebasing.

      Being able to rebase so easily like that is so freaking cool.

        • @chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          Any software KVM like Synergy.

          I work from home and Synergy has been a core part of my setup for many years.

          It lets me use my personal PC and work laptop from one KB+M seamlessly.

          I’ve tried so many different things. Input Leap, installed on Aurora by default, is supposed to work with Wayland, but doesn’t work out of the box.

          I’m resigned to using Windows during the week so I can use Synergy and switching back to Linux over the weekend because I prefer it now.

            • @chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              Update: I love you.

              It took a couple tries to get my desktop and laptop connected, and I don’t know why, but it definitely works.

              I’m going to really miss clipboard sharing, but I can make do for now.

              I don’t think I mentioned it, but my work laptop is Windows 11, so I’m happy to report that this is working great even on Windows.

              • oni
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29 months ago

                Are you aware of KDE connect? It can do clipboard sync, and more. Also available on Windows.

    • TurboWafflz
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      I’ve tried bluefin and it felt like when you turn on someone’s old computer they forgot to erase before giving to you, there was just so much useless junk installed. Are the other Ublue distributions a little more normal?

      • @chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        Ublue are based off of Kinoite. If you want something less “bloated”, try that. You can even rebase from Bluefin to that, I believe.

        Keep in mind there are two versions of Bluefin/Aurora. Regular, and “-dx” which is more developer focused with more developer tools.

        • TurboWafflz
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          Yeah I know what they’re based on, I use silverblue on my laptop. I just personally really disliked bluefin when I tried it and I was wondering if that’s what all of the ublue images are like

  • Akatsuki Levi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    209 months ago

    Alpine It just gives me the system and go “do whatever” It’s snappy, decluttered, doesn’t get in the way It doesn’t have a bazillion systemd components, it’s as barebones as it can be

  • @BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    199 months ago

    OpenSuSE - YaST is as good as is made out to be. I like how many fundamental parts of linux are managed via one tool. Other distros I’d used before were heterogenous mix of tools that felt cobbled together and inconsistent, while YaST feels well designed, integrated and consistent.

    • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      79 months ago

      Tumbleweed surprised me with how it receives constant, up-to-the-minute updates yet somehow doesn’t ever seem to break.

      It also surprised me with how much I like KDE. I had used it way back in the day when it was a bit complicated looking and ugly. These days Plasma makes the whole experience nice.

    • @AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      I’ve run OpenSuSE and then Tumbleweed for a while (as in years, now) on a variety of devices (including nVidia) with no real issues. It’s been by far the most solid of the distributions I’ve used since I started using Linux in the '90s.

  • @StrangeAstronomer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    129 months ago

    voidlinux: gave me much better battery life - I assume because it starts as a minimal system and one adds only the essentials to do the job - compared to the soup-to-nuts distros that pile everything in so that newbies are acccomodated. Of course, the voidlinux approach needs more linux skills - but it’s not that hard and the doco is great.

    Also, I love the back to basics runit init system and runsv service runner (I’m old so I like that stuff) and the ultra fast xbps packaging system.

    • @FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      Been curious to try. How is your RAM usage on it? Like that it uses runit. Like my systems to be minimalistic and with little bloat.

  • Caveman
    link
    fedilink
    129 months ago

    Any distro with KDE, when I was on Windows I thought Linux always looked like Gnome.

    • @tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      Gnome is a harmless though. It’s so benign it’s reliable.

      KDE is glossy and featureful and sometimes my CPU fan doesn’t go down for whole hours because baloo is scanning my entire filesystem (including various conda installations) despite me repeatedly asking it not to.

      • Caveman
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        I think it depends on how you use the OS, Gnome is great until you have a bunch of outdated extensions that break stuff. My impression is that KDE is better for the “advanced” use case and gnome is better for the “default”. I tried gnome recently and I found it very pleasant and easy to use but I prefer KDE since it has more customization.

  • @thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    129 months ago

    Steam OS 3 from Steam Deck. It’s based on Archlinux, but system is write protected by default. And the Gaming mode is surprisingly good. And that the Desktop mode is just Arch+KDE.

  • @PushButton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    109 months ago

    Void.

    It all started by curiosity: “let’s try this no-where distros for the lulz”

    Then it ended up to be the distro I am using everywhere.

    It’s stable and quite on the “bleeding edge” in term of software versions…

    And damn it’s fast son!

  • s4if
    link
    fedilink
    89 months ago

    Arch Linux. Many people said it is unstable and hard to setup. It turns out very stable as long as I update it frequently and AUR makes installing software easier. Even easier than ppa-based ubuntu as it will destroy your dependency if you are not careful. Lol.

  • @vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    89 months ago

    I tried Pop!_OS alpha1 with Cosmic Desktop and I even if the general software quality is still what you might expect from the first alpha release, I was impressed on the high-level design decisions they made with Cosmic. As a sway user who would like a bit more structure and hand-holding in my desktop, I think I’m gonna like Cosmic in a year’s time.

  • @bbbhltz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Many have surprised me for different reasons.

    The most recent that did is Alpine. I decided for some reason to install it for regular desktop use on an RPI400.

    First surprise, the ISO was so small. Second surprise, everything installed so fast when I used the install scripts. Third surprise was the up-to-date repos. The final surprise was the community: it handled noob questions and complicated questions so well, walked users through click by click and one command at a time. Awesome and totally an acceptable option for a desktop which is why I immediately installed it on my main laptop and used it for a number of months.

    • @tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      +1 for Alpine. I had my reservations due to their mistrust for glibc which rattled my GNU sensibilities, but musl is rock steady and all my apps feel stable and hackable.