• pelya
    link
    fedilink
    4451 year ago

    YYYY-MM-DD is the only acceptable date format, as commanded by ISO 8601.

    • clif
      link
      fedilink
      681 year ago

      “There shall be no other date formats before ISO8601. Remember this format and keep it as the system default”

      • @EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        YES! I wish more people knew about RFC 3339. While I’m all for ISO 1601, it’s a bit too loose in its requirements at times, and people often end up surprised that it’s just not the format they picked…

      • @CoderKat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Huh, I’ve never noticed how much bloat was in ISO 8601. I think when most people refer to it, we’re specifically referring to the date (optionally with time) format that is shared with RFC 3339, namely 2023-11-22T20:00:18-05:00 (etc). And perhaps some fuzziness for what separates date and time.

      • umbraroze
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        Funny thing, in ISO 8601 date isn’t separated by colon. The format is “YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS+hh:mm”. Date is separated by “-”, time is separated by “:”, date and time are separated by “T” (which is the bit that a lot of people miss). Time zone indicator can also be just “Z” for UTC. Many of these can be omitted if dealing with lesser precision (e.g. HH:MM is a valid timestamp, YYYY-MM is a valid datestamp if referring to just a month). (OK so apparently if you really want to split hairs, timestamps are supposed to be THH:MM etc. Now that’s a thing I’ve never seen anyone use.) Separators can also be omitted though that’s apparently not recommended if quick human legibility is of concern. There’s also YYYY-Wxx for week numbers.

      • Unaware7013
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        This, but all run together.

        I write files/reports to disk a lot from scripts, so that’s my preferred format.

          • Unaware7013
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Are you talking epoch? I don’t care for that mainly because it’s not human readable. I see the use for it, but I struggle with it in practical use.

    • @geissi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      For file names, absolutely.
      When I’m asking what date it is I typically know the current year.

    • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Except the information is given least to most important, making verbal abbreviation difficult. Works great for file names though.

          • @CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “I can reuse this old function if I just monkey-patch this other class to work with it, no one will have any issues understanding what’s going on”

            Edit: Thought this was the programmerhumor community. For context: A monkey-patch is when you write code that changes the behaviour of some completely different code when it is running, thus making its inner workings completely incomprehensible to the poor programmer using or reading your code.

  • Provoked Gamer
    link
    fedilink
    831 year ago

    DD/MM/YY and YY/MM/DD are the only acceptable ones IMO. Throwing a DD in between YY and MM is just weird since days move by faster so they should be at one of the ends and since YY moves the slowest it should be on the other end.

    • BZ 🇨🇦
      link
      fedilink
      271 year ago

      I’m not kidding when I ask: are there really a lot of people using MM/DD/YYYY??

      • @CM400@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        281 year ago

        I think most Americans do. Or at least it was taught that way in school when I was growing up. Maybe it’s because of the way we speak dates, like “October 23rd” or “May 9th, 2005”.

        Regardless, the only true way to write dates is YYYY-MM-DD.

      • clif
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        Pretty much every American I’ve ever met. Dates on drivers license, bank info, etc - all in MM/DD/YYYY … or even just MM/DD/YY

        I regularly confuse people with YYYY-MM-DD

    • @paultimate14@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      If you use DD/MM/YYYY, dumb sorting algorithms will put all of the 1sts of every month together, all of the 2nds of every month together, etc. That doesn’t seem very useful unless you’re trying to identify monthly trends, which is fundamentally flawed as things like the number of days in the month or which day of the week a date falls on can significantly disrupt those trends.

      With MM/DD/YY, the only issue is multiple years being grouped together. Which may be what you want, especially if the dates are indicating cumulative totals. Depending on the data structure, years are often sorted out separately anyways.

      YYYY/MM/DD is definitely the best for sorting. However, the year is often the least important piece in data analysis. Because often the dataset is looking at either “this year” or “the last 12 months”. So the user’s eyes need to just ignore the first 5 characters, which is not very efficient.

      If you’re using a tool that knows days vs months vs years that can help, but you can run into compatibility issues when trying to move things around.

      The ugly truth no one wants to admit on these conversations is that these formats are tools. Some are better suited to certain jobs than others.

    • tiredofsametab
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Japan is YYYY-MM-DD, but when we talk about dates where a year is unneeded, we just cut it off which leaves it in the US standard format of MM-DD, much to the annoyance of non-US foreigners living here.

    • @takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      The only reason they place month as first is because it is fits how dates are read in English, but that’s not a good reason to keep that format.

      • @sobanto@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s how it is read in English (simplified) aka american english. Brittish english doesn’t do this nonsense, the talk in the correct format (first of january etc.).

        (I’m sorry if i made some mistakes, english is my second language)

    • @bleistift2@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      I grew up with DD.MM.YYYY. But I think, MM/DD makes sense in everyday usage. You don’t often need to specify dates with year accuracy. “Jane’s prom is on 7th September” – it’s obvious which year is meant. Then it’s sensible to start with the larger unit, MM, instead of DD.

      Even in writing you see that the year is always given like an afterthought: “7th September**,** 2023“.

      • Bizzle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        So when you say it out loud you say 7th September, and not September 7th?

  • @Gabu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    381 year ago

    This meme implies there’s an equal battle between MM/DD/YY and DD/MM/YY, which is nonsense. Much like imperial units, only 'murica uses MM/DD/YY.

    • @SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Fuckin wait until you hear how many feet are in a mile. You all should’ve waterboarded us harder while we were a young country.

        • @rdri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          In a text like “the research started at 2003-01-24”, or pretty much in any other text where you need to convey all 3 elements.

          I bet you also don’t say “14 07 1789”, because that’s what MM format means.

          • @joneskind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            You bet wrong

            We write AND say “La Révolution a démarré le 14/07/1789” or “La Révolution à démarré le 14 juillet 1789”

            Spoken numbered month are usually used in an administrative context, to ease the work of our contact.

            • @rdri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Oh that’s right, the spoken administrative context. Same in my dd-mm-yyyy county actually. Still, I find it less intuitive than the logical yyyy-mm-dd when understanding written text.

    • @Algaroth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      We do that in Sweden as well. Our social security numbers are that plus 4 unique numbers. The beers I send out to stores have yyyy-mm-dd printed at the bottom.

  • @lemmiter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    311 year ago

    I propose the use of MYDYDM format. So, October 15, 2023 will be written as 121350. Just to make it as confusing as possible.

  • @Goldmaster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    311 year ago

    Iso date format. Anything to do with photos is best to have in this format at the start of the filename.

  • Engywook
    link
    fedilink
    271 year ago

    TBH, Japanese format makes sense when you use it to name files/directories, as sorting by “name” is equivalenti to sorting by “last modified”.

  • kamen
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    DD/MM for readability, YYYY/MM/DD for alphabetical sorting that’s also chronological.

    • @Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -29
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ironically, MM/DD/YYYY works better for chronological sorting than DD/MM/YYYY, so long as you don’t go between years.

      Didn’t think I’d be saying this but the Americans have an edge over us Brits.

      • kamen
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        By this logic one might say that DD/MM/YYYY works for alphabetical chronological sort if you don’t go between months…

      • Victor
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Have another go at this train of thought, mate… You’re basically saying “MM/DD” is better at sorting chronologically than “DD/MM”, since the year part is taken out of the equation, which is already the established consensus, and not ironical whatsoever. And the ISO standard is already to use YYYY-MM-DD, so that’s the winner IMO, hands down. Japan is simply following that but using a slash as the delimiter.

      • @veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        When you search or do any stable sort, I would think you want your primary attribute to be the one with most finite values? That way you are front loading the pruning of the search space.

        So it’s actually on favor of Japanese style