• Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Was going to say this, many people cite it but never read. It is readable well, do it.

      Also, I think Fahrenheit 451 translates far better to our situation, as I see media and social media in there long before it was even thinkable.

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        1984/farenheit 451/Brave New World are the adolescent trilogy for me that anyone who wants to understand the nature of people and mechanics of power would do well to read.

        I’d add Animal Farm to that as well.

        • Strider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          It’s good to add the other two too but I never could read brave new world, I struggled page by page and gave up. Can not name a specific reason other than I could not get into it.

          From a story perspective it should be perfect for me.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 days ago

    A People’s History of the United States, by Howard Zinn.

    There is so, so much that Americans don’t know that they don’t know.

  • KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    19 days ago

    A pixie book or equivalent. Pixie books are short children’s books (maybe 12 DinA6 pages with very little text and lots of pictures). They are dirt cheap and there is a big bowl full of them in many books stores in Germany. They are meant to get kids into reading and that’s why I ‘nominated’ them here xD

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    1984, so that people mentioning it online will stop sounding like complete fucking idiots.

    Or perhaps The Jungle; it sparked public outcry and major overhauls the last time it became popular, maybe it can work its magic again.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    18 days ago

    A lot of fiction here so I’ll go the other way and suggest “Perfectly Legal: The Covert Campaign to Rig Our Tax System to Benefit the Super Rich–and Cheat Everybody Else” by David Cay Johnston.

    https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/291700/perfectly-legal-by-david-cay-johnston/

    If people aren’t outraged, they aren’t paying attention.

    Sample:

    "Once, Blattmachr devised a way that Bill Gates, the richest man in America, could reap $200 million in profits on Microsoft stock without paying the $56 million of capital gains taxes that federal law required at the time. The plan was so lucrative that Gates would not have to pay a single dollar in tax and would even be entitled to an income tax deduction of $6 million or so. And that was just the initial plan. The concept could be applied endlessly, allowing Gates to convert billions of dollars in Microsoft stock gains into cash over the years. So long as the Internal Revenue Service did not challenge the deals, then Gates could realize unlimited capital gains without the pain of taxes.

    The trick was in manipulating charitable trusts, a common enough device used by generous people who own an asset, such as stock or a building that has appreciated in value. Instead of selling the asset and investing the after-tax proceeds, an individual or a married couple can donate the asset to a charitable trust that they control. The trust sells the asset tax-free and invests the proceeds, giving the donating individual or couple a lifetime income, typically 6 percent per year. When the donors die, what remains in the trust, typically half its value, goes to charity.

    Blattmachr’s plan was to take back not 6 percent annually for life, but 80 percent per year for two years. Gates could have pocketed at least $192 million without paying any tax. Then the trust would fold and a charity would get the remaining sum, less than $8 million. Under the plan Gates could have converted into cash more than 96 percent of gains on the Microsoft shares he donated, not the 72 percent he was entitled to after federal capital gains taxes. The charity would get less than four cents on each donated dollar. The government would collect nothing.

    The scheme even created a tax deduction that was enough to reduce Gates’s income taxes by about $2 million.

    Whether Gates took advantage of such a plan is not known for sure because the law makes individual income tax records confidential. What is known is that when Blattmachr made this route available to others, it sold like a treasure map where X marks the tax-free spot. Billions of dollars of assets poured into these short-term charitable trusts and their super-rich owners took many millions of dollars of income tax deductions that further cut into the flow of revenue to the government.

    The technique was so outlandish that when some other tax lawyers got their hands on the map in March 1994, they sent it to the Department of the Treasury in a plain brown envelope. That July, Treasury blocked the route to newcomers and said that it would pursue those who used the device. However, the Internal Revenue Service never announced whether it collected any of the taxes. One hint that the IRS may not have acted against those who used the technique can be found in the records of United States Tax Court, which is where taxpayers challenge the IRS. There are no Tax Court cases in which taxpayers fought for a court blessing on the device, known in taxspeak as an “accelerated charitable remainder trust.”

    The Treasury rules shutting down this route to tax-free investment profits were not the end of stretching charitable trusts in ways never anticipated by Congress. So facile is Blattmachr’s mind that from those 1994 rules he divined a new route to tax-free gains. He started selling a new treasure map and billions of dollars more in capital gains passed untaxed into the bank accounts of his clients before the government blocked that second path, known in taxspeak as “son of accelerated charitable remainder trust.”

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 days ago

      There’s been a lot of abuse of Trusts in finance for a while. This seems like a good recommendation.

      One thing I don’t follow; if someone puts their money into a charitable trust, achieving those lighter tax rules, wouldn’t the obvious rule be that the trust could only then be spent on communal benefit, NOT withdrawn as a personal piggy bank?

      It’s fine if someone wants to make an account that is given to charity in case of their death, but then pro-charity tax rules shouldn’t take effect until they die. I’m confused as to why it wouldn’t work that way.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        Sounds like a loophole that was either accidentally or intentionally inserted. This book is full of them.

  • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 days ago

    Excluding religious text~

    Meditations by Marcus Aurelius

    Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari

    Any book written by Cormac McCarthy

    11/22/63 by Stephen King

    Short stories by Kurt Vonnegut

    Do Androinds Dream of Electric Sheep by Philip K. Dick

    Definitely lots more

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 days ago

      I was about to type ‘I’ve been meaning to read that’ for the Stephen King book, but I have now and it’s fine. I wouldn’t call it a must read. As a time travel story it’s in the top three

    • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Any book written by Cormac McCarthy

      I tried to listen to the audio book of Blood Meridian and it was awful. I couldn’t stomach it.

      • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        I haven’t tried to audio book his stuff. The style of writing seems like it wouldn’t translate well. I think Blood Meridian is my second favorite book he wrote.

        • Sektor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I have BM audiobook downloaded on my phone. I haven’t read many books but this one is probably top 3 for me.

        • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          It wasn’t the style that bothered me. It was the horrible acts committed by the main characters. Just non-stop brutality.

          • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            Oh, I mean yeah they are bad people and based off real people that existed. The Judge is also literally an allegory for the devil/pure evil. Its a good book about bad people. The Road might be more your speed. Still plenty of evil characters but at least your protagonists are good. The boy in that story is basically the antithesis of the judge and is representative of purity in the face of evil. Still has some particularly rough parts. I get what you’re saying though. I tapped out of American Psycho for like 3 years after one particularly rough section, only finished it recently. Different author but the only book I’ve had to put down.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Which is ridiculous. I’ve read one book since the weekend.

      It should be made clear though that there are book and there are Books. I feel like this question is about the latter and those are not the ones you had to read in as part of your middle/high school curriculum. Also the one that I read probably doesn’t qualify as a capital B book.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      The book of the universe of books

      I read all of those by Frank, and none of the others

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 days ago

    Stranger in a Strange Land

    Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy

    Same message, two vastly different methods of communicating it

    • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      I’m not sure hhgttg recommends incest with large breasted red heads as much as stranger in a strange land.

      I guess I’ll bite, what’s the message?

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        recommends incest with large breasted red heads as much as stranger in a strange land.

        Whut?

        I guess I’ll bite, what’s the message?

        That life is inexplicable and overly complicated because people are hung up on others perceptions instead of what makes them happy. And if everyone just chilled out and tried to make shit a lot better, we’d all be better off

        • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          This is my mistake,.I went through a Heinlein phase and this one was the last straw for me.I may have had some bleedover from his other books, where I recall his treatment of women sucked ass, was pretty incestuous, and always features promiscuous red heads. I did really like “the moon is a harsh mistress” even if I think libitarism is purile.

          I still think stranger is just a Jesus story (it’s been ages), where hhgtg didn’t have a point except maybe you are at the mercy of the universe, and God is sorry for the inconvenience.

          I’m not sure how you got that message, Arthur specifically isn’t even aware of his friend being an alien when his house is demolished. He kind of just faces what’s next in terror, at least until the fenchurch bits. Even when he’s stuck on earth I wouldn’t say he’s having a good time.

    • courval@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      I’ve bought that crap after the BBC promoted it with a dedicated article many years ago… It’s such a boring and average book … I felt scammed.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      The Fountainhead was actually an interesting enough story even if you don’t agree with the message Rand conveyed.

      Atlas shrugged is just… Verbose. Has a plot but my god, the pages upon pages of monologue was too much.

      But in the end neither are required reading (and I know you weren’t suggesting as such.)

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Feels pretty cliche to say them, but

    1984, the handmaid’s tale and brave new world

    Should probably be on anyone’s list that hasn’t managed to get to them yet