• @MrMamiya@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    912 years ago

    Photoshop is easier to use than gimp. I don’t pay for photoshop, but if I needed something like that I would.

    • Amilo159
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      I wouldn’t say Photoshop is easy but Gimp is horrendous.

      • @MrMamiya@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        142 years ago

        Well yeah I was answering for me though, not the whole internet.

        Gimp has a work flow that I can’t get into, photoshop clicks better. For you, it could be the opposite and that’s great.

        I’m not selling photoshop, I don’t even use either anymore. It would be stupid not to try to make gimp work for you first.

        • @miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          They aim to introduce that in version 3.0, which they say will be a complete overhaul of the app.

          Non-destructive editing through live adjustment layers is definitely the single most useful feature any editing software can have.

          That alone makes life so much easier.

    • @Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Krita is closer to Photoshop than Gimp, although still not up to it. Just in case you ever need PS, try krita first.

    • @nocturne213@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Photoshop is one i cannot shake too. If I need to make a graphic to post on social media for my shop, Photoshop does it. If I need to edit a picture, Photoshop.

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Darktable is pretty much a Lightroom replica in terms of the workflow. Its main issue is that Darktable reacts to slider changes in an unpredictable way. Small value differences lead to overblown changes to the image. Fine tuning the result is near impossible.

    • @MtDewaholic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I’ve had a pretty good experience using photopea as a photoshop replacement. Definitely not quite as powerful, but it has more than enough features for your average user

  • @sudo22@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    772 years ago

    Steam. The support they have for multiplatform almost feels open source and they have been invaluable for the adoption of desktop Linux

  • oneguynick
    link
    fedilink
    592 years ago

    The most recent one is, of course, Sync for Lemmy. It may just be muscle memory at this point, but I find the experience a step improvement in browsing.

    On my home server front, I would mention Plex despite Jellyfin’s massive improvements over the past 2 years. Plexamp is just a magical piece of software.

    For the most part, though, I think I’d reverse the question. Most of the time, I prefer OSS.

    • CharlestonChewbacca
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I agree about Plex. But I don’t get the love for Sync.

      It feels kind of clunky and it lacks some features many of the other apps have. Personally, I’m liking Thunder right now, but I’m excited for Boost to come out.

      Sync has ads unless you pay, it’s not open source, and I haven’t actually found anything superior about it.

    • @ArmainAP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      I wonder, what makes a good CAD system?

      I had this idea for a while to build a Frankenstein monster of a 3D software that uses real time graphics and has a multi step build process covering CAD, wireframe manipulation and voxel workflows. If I ever actually make it, your concerns will be heard despite being probably not the best softwsre to do your work in :)

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        172 years ago

        CAD system must be reliable. It is simply unacceptable to have math issues which cause unpredictable geometries.

        CAD system should have a good UI. This is a big issue for open source software in general as UI and UX is usually an afterthought.

        CAD system should be fast and use hardware acceleration. Running single threaded python scripts on CPU to do complex computations kills the productivity. Designing real life objects is already a mentally taxing task, the whole purpose of CAD is to remove the computational bottleneck of a human.

        CAD should be object aware. If I draw two gears and put them next to each other, I should be able to rotate one and see the other moving accordingly.

        This is a bare minimum, I’m not even talking about computational modelling, stress testing, etc.

      • @stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        That is a question too hard to answer in a comment and one that depends on the use case of the software. Few users need the power and features of CATIA or NX, but those who need it can’t accept anything lesser. SolidWorks is a good spot in terms of flexibility and features if it could be easier for the average person to use. You need proper accurate parametric modeling (e.g. a NURBS kernel) for solid models and surfacing. Hearing things like wireframe and voxel indicates it isn’t suitable to me.

    • Amilo159
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      There why we use ReVanced YouTube and YouTube ad block extensions.

      • @SoBoredAtWork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        ReVanced? I used to use Vanced, but I guess it was shut down. I’ve been looking for an alternative (but clearly not very hard).

        • Amilo159
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          ReVanced is pretty much exactly same thing as Vanced, except it works still and is kept updated.

  • @DLSantini@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    282 years ago

    Photoshop, Fences, Plex, Steam, Unraid. I just highly prefer them to any alternatives I have tried. And believe me, I have tried every alternative to Photoshop and Fences that I could find. They just don’t do it. And because of those two in particular, I have to add Windows to the list.

    Oh, and I guess Sync for Lemmy. The only reason I even know what Lemmy is, is the fact that the Sync for Reddit app stopped working and basically said, “Yeah, move to Lemmy, idiot.”

    • @Samuraipizzacat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Same. I know sync isn’t foss but the features and how it’s presented got me into the lemmyverse. I use it more than jerboa or infinity. Both great but the sync guy has a good smooth app. I support that.

    • @spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I used RIF for many years until the Spezzening. Jerboa is pretty good, but felt just a little shy of something. Sync felt great as soon as I tried it.

    • Aki
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Fair, but I don’t agree with the choices personally speaking.

      Photoshop, sure. I’ve been in groups where you need it to open PSDs to collaborate.

      Plex is up for debate. Jellyfin is not there yet, but it’s already a viable alternative.

      Steam is proprietary because it’s a distribution platform for pay-to-play software, not sure why you’d want an open-source alternative.

      Unraid, will never use it. Heck, can’t see the need to use any NAS-specific operating systems over plain Linux. Yes, it takes a whole lot more to set it up, but it’s just as worth as paying $130, or more if you live in a developing country.

      Fences, just no. I’ve used them a long time before, sure they’re really useful, but the best alternative is to just not depend on it. I’m faster at typing the name of the application or the folder I want to access, so I use KRunner. Sometimes the best organisation tool is to NOT use a particular organisation tool. If you really need one when dealing with large amounts of data, you can definitely use methods like Zettelkasten, think of extended attributes or metadata.

    • @Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      Inkscape works good on Windows too, but its UI… It’s like it was made by monkeys for dinosaurs. I’m not sure that Inkscape devs ever tried to use it themselves.

      • @scarilog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Idk about you but I thought this was the case as well, since the last time I used Inkscape was probably like 6 years ago, and at the time, the UI was super dated looking (don’t get me wrong, it was still functional).

        The different is night and day now, I honestly couldn’t tell that it was the same software. UI looks super clean and modern.

        • @Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          I used fresh Inkscape installation to fix some SVG files last month. Its UI is still cancer from 1990-s.

      • @miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Version 1.3 has introduced a shape builder tool, always nice to have that. Overall, it seems that is has improved quite a bit in the last few years, so that’s good to see

      • @finestnothing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Nope it’s not. It’s free, but you can only look at part of the source code and can’t look at the proprietary parts. Logseq is completely FOSS though

        • @FIST_FILLET@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          damn, that’s kind of a bummer since i love it so much. logseq looks exciting, how does it compare to obsidian feature-wise?

          • @finestnothing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Tbh, it’s a different philosophy for taking notes. There is overlap in features, but also a lot of differences.

            In obsidian, everything is file based, you manage the folder system, and you primarily link files together.

            In logseq, it’s more based around blocks which are indented portions of the content. You can still make files and link to the file itself rather than a block, but a lot of your notes will be on your journal pages and link to other blocks/days/content/tags, etc. I prefer logseq to obsidian, but it’s a very different file setup type than normal since you normally don’t worry about individual files and keeping track of them, you can just link to the content later. You can still make separate files though, and they work well. The focus is just on blocks rather than files

            Both have note linking and embedding (logseqs is better imo), graph view, searching, plugins, themes, etc. I’d say they’re on par in terms of features, it’s just whichever notes system you prefer and work better with tbh

      • @PlexSheep@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        It is closed source. I haven seen any partial source code anywhere either. Licensing is very generous: free forever for personal use, you only need to get a license at 50$ per year if you are a commercial user. There is also a 2 week trial for commercial users.

        Of course, besides legality, there is nothing stopping you from using obsidian for commercial things, they don’t do any checking for that stuff.

    • @NathanUp@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Bitwig is outstanding. I so wish there was an open source DAW that came close in stability and workflow. Zrythm crashes constantly, and the workflow in Ardour is obtuse. I can’t quite figure out how to do anything in LMMS and the other options just look so dated I’m not even tempted to try them.

      • @PlexSheep@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I’ve heard that many swear by reaper. I once started it and couldn’t figure out the UI at all, and the UI design just felt ancient. Didn’t give it another chance after that.

      • @Rogers@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        logseq definitely coming along. I tried their donation only sync and it seems to mostly work.

        That said nothing has beaten Standardnotes for me. Standardnotes can be found on flathub, fdroid etc. The only drawback is to get the important features you need to either selfhost or buy the plan. The free service is very barebones

  • @PeterPoopshit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Visual studio code. There’s nothing else that’s anywhere near as good that doesn’t cost money. Those annoying terminal text editors just don’t do it for me. I need code autocomplete and do not understand how there exist people who have the patience to get by without it. I do not have the time to be switching tabs 20 times a second because I can’t remember function parameter overloads. That intellisense autocomplete is just too good.

    • ƬΉΣӨЯΣƬIKΣЯ
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      VSCodium exists. Not sure whether it has intellisense by default but might be worth a try. It is open source and without all the Microsoft telemetry

    • @stinodes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      What are you talking about? Neovim LSP autocompletion is way faster and smoother than VSCode’s, and one of the reasons I personally have trouble working in the latter nowadays.

      • @nathris@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        I use the proprietary version for the remote tools and settings sync.

        I can work from home on my windows PC with no loss of productivity compared to my Linux workstation.

        And the ability to open any GitHub repo in the browser based Code just by pressing . is a game changer.

    • @sveske_juice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Fair enough. I get that it takes to much time to setup. But it definetly is possible to get autocompletion and syntax higlighting etc. In a terminal based editor like vim.

      I don’t mind spending a copule of hours setting up my development environment, since I spend so much time coding anyway. So its a trade off. But if VS code works for you, theb definetly stick with that. I used VS code alot myself but tried exploring other tools and switched to vim. But it nerver hurts to try other things out.

  • @archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    212 years ago

    Spotify. I’ve wanted to use Funkwhale since it’s self-hosted and federated but I couldn’t give up all that Spotify offers.

    • Juki
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      I’ve never even looked for an alternative, what started as mild intrigue a decade ago turned into my only window into music, as much as the interface can sometimes drive me mad (and their sometimes cavalier attitude to changing it) I just can’t deny that the recommendation engines have introduced me to whole new worlds of music which I love and wouldn’t even know exists otherwise

    • @Surp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      Spotify doesn’t have highfi use apple music instead even though Spotify has a superior interface

  • @FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    212 years ago

    Spotify for music. I like the UI and the fact I can use it on all my devices.

    Steam for games. I like that I can have progress synced across my Steam Deck, laptop and desktop.

    Waze for maps and navigation. I like being able to report things on the road and update fuel prices etc

    • Atemu
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Waze for maps and navigation. I like being able to report things on the road and update fuel prices etc

      We really need something like that. We already have OSM which can do this for more static things but I’m not aware of anything which can do that for “live” data.