• bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    …in mice, after massive, cancer-causing doses, probably.

    I’m tired of hearing about this shit. Put it to market or stop talking about it.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeah just push it out to public. Just like they did with women’s contraceptives.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s great but I’ve been seeing articles like this for decades so I’ll believe it when there’s an actual working product you can actually get

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Best $50 I’ve ever spent. Quick procedure, quick recovery with an excuse to not do anything for a couple days.

          • BassTurd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Midwest US, but it’s really down to the insurance policy. This particular procedure was 100% covered other than copay. Copay was usually $50, but for specialties it was $75. If you have insurance, definitely check your policy. A lot of times vasectomy is explicitly called out.

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Never regretted it myself, but technically quite a good chance of reversibility (85+%) and 95+% chance of viable artificial insemination if things change.

        Also minimal, short lived discomfort.

        • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s considered permanent though. Shouldn’t go ahead under view it can be reversed. Saying that, the piece of mind it brings is wonderful.

          • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            Also, compare those to the near certain side effects of female contraception, which is just taken as the natural state of affairs.

          • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Valid, those are pretty good odds though, mind you I looked it up decades ago and the reversal was a pretty involved piece of expensive microsurgery.

    • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Testosterone is a fairly effective male contraceptive agent, but most people can’t get over the side effect of ball shrinkage.

      • Damaskox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Hmm. And what “debuffs” (for a lack of a better term, lol) can a male experience from this side effect?

        • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Other than the psychological trauma of having smaller balls, there isn’t much in terms of permanent damage. Men on fitness forums claim their testosterone permanently crashes, but this demographic tends towards hypochondria and body dysmorphia. Although this particular side effect can be prevented with HCG injections, this would restore fertility.

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re progressing slowly, but it’s obvious that they don’t want a bad launch so they’re all waiting until they have something that works and is safe enough and safety only comes from having people take it then see if it works after being reversed or ended years later.

  • harambe69@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Kinda hard to make male contraceptives. Women are naturally infertile for most of the time not spent actively ovulating. They are permanently infertile during pregnancy, real or synthetic. But men? We’re always churning out swimmers. When that process stops, something has gone very wrong.

    So, artificially induce a naturally occurring phenomenon vs artificially terminate a constant mechanism.

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Summary:

    Scientists at Cornell University may be closing in on the long-sought “holy grail” of male contraception: a safe, reversible, nonhormonal method that completely halts sperm production. In a breakthrough mouse study, researchers used a compound called JQ1 to temporarily shut down meiosis—the critical process that produces sperm—without causing lasting harm. After treatment stopped, sperm production bounced back, fertility returned, and the animals produced healthy offspring.

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      They have no real idea what harm it may cause. Sterilizing people with an unknown method and promising it’s ‘reversible’ is capitalist propaganda.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    We need this just because Republicans would never tell a straight white man what to do with his body…

    And any birth control is better than none, for the periods we can’t have all methods.

  • sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’ve had something similar available for years. It’s a small plastic square about the size of a lego brick. You put it in your shoe and it makes you limp

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Excellent. Now all those “but I can’t get a vasectomy” guys have another option. Beyond time to put the onus for not reproducing on the male side of the equation.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Can’t get a vasectomy if you plan having kids.

      But actual issue is no, we do not have another option, because this study has been done on mice, so even if it would actually happen it would take easily 10 years before it would go to market.

      What’s worse is that it won’t happen. Google RISUG, Smart RISUG, Vasalgel and Plan A.

      These are simple polymers that are injected into the vas deferens of a man and stay there for years up to decades, making the man sterile. It’s easily reversible, has no side effects and just disables fertility. And it’s been blocked by pharma companies since the 70s, because it would cost them massive amounts of money if women wouldn’t need to pay for expensive and short-lasting contraception methods.

      The situation that only women have access to decent methods of contraception sucks, and the most infuriating part is that it doesn’t have to be, but because it would cost some rich assholes money, they purposely keep the situation as is.

      Believe me, most men would much prefer to have access to good methods of contraception, but we are essentially stuck at the same level since the 1920s.