• Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    25 minutes ago

    OK Newsom, you’ve lost me. I enjoyed your chaotic responses to the drumpf but you’ve officially lost me.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      Realize, this has always been him. He is NOT a liberal. He is a conservative who calls himself a democrat.

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 minutes ago

    The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age, setting AB 1043 apart from similar laws passed in Texas and Utah that require “commercially reasonable” verification methods, such as government-issued ID checks.

    What even is the point of this then? To make shitty parents feel better?

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Considering the massive number of servers running Linux used in the industry, this sounds like a good way to kill the Tech Industry in California.

  • Kaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Saw someone say this on the last article I saw regarding this, but:

    What’s stopping the OSes from just putting “Not for use in California” on their product/website? Seems like a simple and easy fix lol.

  • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age

    That part is good at least. It also makes the California law an exercise in wasting everyone’s time and money.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The law was designed this way specifically so that people won’t fight it as hard because it doesn’t provide any verification requirements. That bill would come later once the outrage over this has waned and the age gating becomes normalized in the local culture so that people just shrug off the verification requirement in the future.

      They’re not wasting any time or money, they’re just playing the long game.

  • sicktriple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    16 hours ago

    So now when I spin up a VM at my sysadmin job I have to tell the server I’m an adult? Does anyone actually know what the fuck we are doing here? What an absolute clown show.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Does anyone actually know what the fuck we are doing here?

      Obviously not, no.

      You’re a sysadmin… you should know this.

      You’re the person who has to actually think through the results of other people’s decisions.

      That’s your job, lol.

      Other people get paid to make decisions, not think about them.

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      95
      ·
      16 hours ago

      This is what happens when boomers never die and stay in office for a lifetime. They don’t understand technology but are allowed to make the laws that govern their use.

      • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Nha boomers are not the cause for this shit. Smart ass marketeers and tech bro pushing for more precise target identification and thus more reach for them are to blame. And those I stumble upon are definitely on the younger side.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    158
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Simple solution. From now on Linux distros should ship with a big message “NOT FOR USE IN CALIFORNIA”.

    You want to force age verification? No server in all of California will run. Period.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    How will this affect embedded os like freertos or vxworks? There are lightbulbs that have operating systems these days, am I going to have to show ID to turn on my light?

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 hours ago

      My guess would be these OS’s just wont do it and stop doing business in that state.

      Lucky for you, you can just download them anyway.

      My guess is also that these lawmakers dont care nor considered other OS’s than Windows, MacOS, iOS and Android.

    • Attacker94@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It all but makes the law useless, but the law characterizes viable age verification as being self reported, so the Id wouldn’t be necessary.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      As those are not general purpose computing devices, and additionally have no app store - no, and no.

      From the law text:

      © “Application” means a software application that may be run or directed by a user on a computer, a mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device that can access a covered application store or download an application.

      • dondelelcaro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The law defines a public webpage as a covered app store. Anything that can run doom and view a webpage is potentially covered.

        It’s way overbroad and unclear how it could be implemented, and likely to be challenged in court if it even gets that far.

  • banshee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Age verification is stupid. I wonder if anyone thought of using a captcha. Require users to solve an appropriately complex problem before they use systems that require a certain amount of intelligence.

    Would be fun to embed empathy quizzes for access to social media 😄

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Age verification is stupid, but it’s also not the goal.

      Nearly all of the “think of the children” is really just subtext for “we want to be able to track literally everything you do”.

      • banshee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yes this is true, and it’s good to remind everyone. I just had a random idea for the (rare) exception to the rule.