After 4 years of using Fedora KDE as my main OS with 0 issues or drawbacks, my workplace is now requiring all computers to be on Windows 11. Any suggestions to make the transition back more bearable?

My dissapointment is immeasurable, and my day is ruined :(

  • Karna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    At workplace, use whatever OS and tools allowed by company policy.

    At home, use whatever OS and tools you like.

    At least that is how I’m managing it.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Winboat looks nice. I’m planning to play with it today. I’m also going to try distro box etc. Wish me a happy Virt-day. (yeah, yeah, I know where thee door is.)

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sorry for your loss :( Same thing happened to me about a year ago.

    I was the sole IT admin for a small company. Used Debian with KDE on a snappy little Thinkpad. No issues managing all the infra with it, even though most of it was MS trash. I used Reminnia for RDP into the Windows servers, and the Browser for all O365/Entra administration. A Windows 11 VM for the rare times I needed to test Windows-only apps or configs.

    Worked like a dream, but then we got bought out by a huge competitor. Their IT team took everything over. I had to decommission my on-prem Linux servers, Ansible automations, Open Project tracking and FOSS ticketing system. Finally, I had to give up my Sweet little Linux Thinkpad and use their standard-issue HP Windows 11 garbage laptop. They were slow, clunky, buggy, and ugly, it was awful.

    I quit a few months later after securing the job I have now. It pays about 35% more, has twice as much PTO, and about 50% of my workload is Linux stuff. It’s so much better.

    My advice, if it’s truly non negotiable, install WSL first thing. It’s not nearly as good as having actual Linux, because it’s running inside of Microslop’s horrid OS, but it’s better than nothing. Try to be an advocate for FOSS at the company, see if you can convince leadership to let you implement Linux-based solutions wherever they might fit, make yourself the de facto expert on them so you at least get to work on Linux and FOSS infra.

    Aside from that, start job hunting. Try to find a job that will let you be more Linuxy.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      the last time i used wsl on a work windows laptop, windows fucked up the virtual disk drive and everything in it was gone.

      this was about 5 years ago, so hopefully it’s gotten better.

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s alright now, does what it needs to do. It’s kind of a pain because of the weirdness of running as a pseudo-Cm, but better than no Linux at all.

      • ccunix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Honestly WSL2 is pretty good now. I have Fedora running in it and use basically the same config files as my personal laptop. Neovim behaves exactly the same across both. The only problem I have is that CTRL+V get intercepted by the terminal before it get to vim. That means that block visual mode is not available to me.

        That and multiple desktops feels REALLY clunky, even compare to Gnome.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The only problem I have is that CTRL+V get intercepted by the terminal before it get to vim. That means that block visual mode is not available to me

          this was was my biggest gripe with wsl because i do 95% of my work with the vim and bash and i’m saddened to learn that it hasn’t gotten better.

  • Raccoonn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Depending on your computers specs & if it’s allowed or not by your company… You could always continue to use Fedora & run win-11 inside a VM with pass through enabled…

    • Jess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is what I did. They get to manage a Windows machine and I get to continue being more efficient at the job they hired me to do.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 days ago

    Just use the shovel your boss gives you. Back to your own preferences once you clock out.

    • axx@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Meh, does “the boss” pay you to use a shovel or to dig stuff up?

      It’s obvious OP is going to be miserable and less productive on Windows, it’s not to their employer’s benefit for that to happen.

      • jdnewmil@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Boss has different people for different functions within the company. A monoculture is more susceptible to systematic flaws, but it is also less expensive to maintain. It is not OPs place to decide how the company manages is computing facilities, so if WSL or Cygwin are not accepable compromises (OP and company have to both agree) then OP has to decide whether they are willing to go along with Windows or find another job.

        Something to talk about during the exit interview anyway.

  • ccunix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    WSL is reasonable bearable, you can install Fedora instead of the default Ubuntu/Debian too. My work PC started out on 10 and is now on 11. I think I changed the terminal program, but the one I use may be the default in Win11. Honestly, I think the only programs I run outside WSL are a browser, DaVinci Resolve and Reaper (replaced Kdenlive and Ardour, both of which I prefer).

    I am able to use the same neovim config on both my home (fedora) and work laptops, which is pretty handy.

    At the end of the day it is their computer, not yours.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Doesn’t having WSL under the hood negate Linux’s inherent security?

      I’d much rather have Windows shit containerized within Linux.

      • ccunix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        It is a VM so fully sandboxed. All the sharing is smoke and mirrors (often in pretty cool ways).

        Truth is that security is not OP’s problem. Someone else (likely well above their pay grade) is shouldering that responsibility and they have decreed Windows for everyone.

      • draco_aeneus@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It depends what you mean by ‘security’. Obviously, by introducing more layers, you have more places where exploits can life. However, the biggest threat by orders of magnitude is being tricked into giving stuff up, and that risk will remain constant.

  • ISolox@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Thanks for the info guys, good stuff!

    Those of you who are telling me to look for a new workplace over an OS change are a bit crazy though lol. It’s not quite that bad.

    • kuneho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Think about it the other way around; you could use Linux on your work pc for the time being and your workplace was fine with that? that’s awesome. it’s a bummer things changed, but… that’s corporate life, bro.

  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    Pressing F to pay my respects.

    Sorry to hear that OP.

    When old employer was bought out they tried to move us on to windows. It was shit. After non stop issues they gave in and let us keep linux.

  • suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m sorry to hear that. Our company recently got acquired, and every 4-6 months the new IT team tries to say, “but do you guys really need Linux? What for?”. We answer them, in depth, every time, but then it just comes back up a few months later.

    I’m scared one of these days they’re just going to force the change on us, all productivity will grind to an absolute halt, deliverables will be missed, and eventually they’ll backtrack but only after it’s too late to recover the programs that got hosed in the process.

    • tangonov@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      Just ask them why they want to waste the money on licensing. Money is the language managers understand

      • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Although compliance is also a concern.

        For us, on our Linux machines, they pay Canonical or RedHat for workstations 🤷‍♂️

            • tangonov@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I sometimes forget that I’m not the only kind of user who may run a Linux box. I’m not immune to compromise, but I’m not an “average” user like say… Peggy from accounting.