• @grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      62 days ago

      Yeah, one of my grandpas always chafed against wearing one, especially the part that comes across the chest. He was always “forgetting” to put it on, and holding it down so it wouldn’t like press against him.

      Meanwhile I don’t even think about the seatbelt. Actually it feels wrong if I forget to put it on for some reason.

    • @limelight79@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      22 days ago

      Oh yeah. “You’re safer being ejected from the car in a crash. My cousin’s ex husband’s sister’s daughter survived a crash that way!”

      • @tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        32 days ago

        Those people have never seen someone who has been hit by an air bag. It’s not a gentle pillow it’s a punch to the face and if you aren’t strapped in you’re probably gonna bounce around a bit off the interior.

  • @ChristmasIslandZone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    85
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    When seatbelts were introduced to cars, there was a big movement against them. Some by car manufacturers to keep costs down, but a lot of backlash was from good ol’ natural born idiots so contrarian and averse to change they’d let themselves die just to give a smug look about not doing what someone asked of them. The sort of dumbass who during the height of pre-vaccine Covid would drown in the fluid buildup in their lungs and refuse treatment because doing so would be an admission of fault.

    These past 9 years have made me DEEPLY cynical about my fellow man. There is no bottom. No level of malicious stupidity is low enough. It’s not even disappointment anymore, I’m resigned to it. Some people are so beyond hope, so beyond redemption, it’s like trying to get a fucking deer to recognize itself in a mirror. Just ZERO awareness, no theory of mind, object permanence is a fucking coin flip. If it weren’t for my principles, my absolute refusal to engage in dehumanization, I’d be tempted to write them off as another species just to cope with the dissonance that comes from seeing people acting that self destructive. Like it doesn’t make sense. You’d expect at some point some form of pattern recognition and harm avoidance to develop. “Hey, putting my hand on the stove hurt. It hurt every time I did it. It hurt everyone I saw someone else do it too. I’m gonna put my hand on the stove and it won’t hurt this time.”.

    • Eyedust
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 days ago

      I was annoyed about the seatbelt laws, but I was a little kid at the time. I came from an era of riding in the back of dad’s truck and enjoying the breeze. Hell, I went from New England to Canada in the back of a capped truck. I was eight years old and never thought anything of it.

      However, as I got older into my teens I got more adamant about using a seat belt, even when the laws were still sorta gray here (you were let off with no warning most times). Now its second nature, even if I’m heading 3 mins to the store. Some people still don’t because they think that they’re only endangering themselves. Thing is, I have a brother in law that’s a first responder. He’s seen people torpedo out of windows in head-on collisions and into the other car, injuring the other driver/passengers.

      Honestly, I don’t get what the whole problem is. You barely even notice them on you. Most people who don’t put on a simple and comfortable safety belt are just being fucking stubborn children who don’t like being told what to do. I’m glad I grew out of that way of thinking. Some my family are those “good ol’ natural borns”. They’ll tell me I don’t have to put my seatbelt on and every time I adamantly say, “I always do”. My other brother in law will literally crank the radio so he can’t hear the seatbelt alarm. Drives me insane, but I love the idiot.

      • @Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Untethered occupants are a serious danger to other occupants in their own car. I wouldn’t agree to drive with someone who wouldn’t put one on tbh, partly because it hints at a lack of judgement and I wouldn’t want that person in charge of the car.

    • I think there is a growing divide between the most and least intelligent in society, and it has been growing with tech advancement (the gap wouldn’t have been that big in the middle ages). If we ever develop superintelligent AI, I can see that becoming an inflection point in this divide because we (Lemmy dwellers) will become as fallible to that AI as the people you mentioned are today in what is still a human-dominated society. Introducing AGI will vastly exasperate the gap between the most and least intelligent and I can’t see society surviving that in its current form.

    • @ceiphas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      There are still people that buy “belt silencers” or sit on their seatbelts to drive without. Newer cars will alarm, and mine even shuts down if you drive without a seatbelt

      • @markovs_gun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        23 days ago

        I think those are mostly for super obese people because seat belts are really uncomfortable if you’re really, really fat. At least that’s what I always assumed because everyone I know who has one is really fat.

    • @tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      32 days ago

      Is that giving a donkey an enema or preforming an enema with a donkey or is it utilizing a donkey to perform an enema…

      • @neidu3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I was thinking of taking an enema meant for donkeys, but I guess whichever method is approved by RFK Jr “works”.

  • @limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    102 days ago

    I’m a little surprised Trump hasn’t signed the “Asbestos Fibers Are Our Friends” Executive Order.

  • @ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    143 days ago

    The Dipshit tried to bring it back his last term. Guess which country is the top producer of asbestos?

  • @Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    663 days ago

    LOL, libs are trying to ban asbestos! They want us all to catch fire! Asbestos causing cancer is a conspiracy, do your own research. Besides, Ivermectin will cure any cancer caused by asbestos.

    /s (because the USA is crazy and someone would really post this and mean it)

  • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    153 days ago

    I’m still in favor of asbestos. It’s an amazing material for preventing fires AS LONG AS you never disturb it. The people that were most at risk of cancers were the people involved in the mining, manufacturing, and installation of asbestos products, but once the asbestos-containing products were installed, they were almost entirely safe for the occupants of the building. You could, in theory, largely mitigate the risks to the miners, manufacturers, and installers, but that is… Well, expensive. And people have a really bad tendency to ignore health and safety warnings when they’re inconvenient. You see the same issue with quartz countertops; they’re known to cause silicosis in people that are doing the cutting unless they do wet cutting for everything, and wear PPE, but a lot of people don’t, because wet-cutting is messy and slow, and PPE is hot and uncomfortable.

    There was a big movement in the late 90s to remove asbestos from old buildings; the current advice is to encapsulate it, and leave it in place.

    • @x3x3@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      You also have to consider removal at the end of life. Or safety risks if another country drops bombs randomly on your cities.

      • Sneezycat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 days ago

        Fair point about removal; but if you’re being bombed, I think asbestos is going to be low on your list of worries.

    • Cats Akimbo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 days ago

      they were almost entirely safe for the occupants of the building

      So would you live in a house your whole life that’s “almost” entirely safe? I don’t think I would

      • @Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        42 days ago

        There are plenty of things that you deal with on a daily basis that are significantly more dangerous than asbestos. And if it had been treated like the hazardous material that it is as soon as we knew it was hazardous, then it would still be used just like all the other hazardous shit we deal with daily. However, as is the usual story, companies not only hid what they knew, but outright lied about its dangers. They called it a miracle material with no downsides. And it is amazingly good at what it does, so it was put in fucking everything, much like AI is today. And so people died for profit. A lot of people.

        • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 days ago

          And it is amazingly good at what it does, so it was put in fucking everything, much like AI is today. And so people died for profit. A lot of people

          funny how history rhymes. I think the confluence of AI and rising fascism is going to kill a lot more people than asbestos if we don’t get our shit together. probably too late now.

      • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        22 days ago

        I did in Chicago. And I absolutely would again, because it makes my house much less likely to burn down from e.g. an electrical fire.

        I quit smoking a decade ago; my risk of lung cancer was–is–far, far higher from smoking than it ever would have been from living in a house with asbestos insulation in the walls and around pipes.

      • @Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I do. My ceiling almost certainly has asbestos in it. I just don’t touch it. Also uncovered a few chunks that looked kinda asbestossy when breaking up the concrete in the garden, it was only a few chunks so I assume something containing it had been dumped there many decades ago. I just disposed of it with everything else and pretended I didn’t see anything.

        It was a very dusty job in the first place so I started spraying it with water to help prevent the dust getting into the air.

    • @Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      23 days ago

      Aren’t there ways to treat the asbestos and prevent the fibers from becoming airborne and posing a serious risk?

  • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    754 days ago

    I used to live in a city called Asbestos, the mine was closed back in 2012 and older folks are still angry about it, they’ll even tell you that the workers handling it weren’t in worse health than anyone else in the city… The worst part is that it was banned in the construction industry 30 years prior, so they kept exploiting the mine only to export it to countries that hadn’t banned it, even if it meant killing people there…

  • @SolidShake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    944 days ago

    Depends who would ban it. From my life experience, we have one side that definitely would because they get mad at anything the other side. ANYTHING. While the other side is typically more rational and has critical thinking skills.

  • @VerbFlow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 days ago

    Back when asbestos was banned, everyone trusted the government. Nobody trusts the government anymore because of its constant foreign wars, corrupt candidates, and human rights abuses. We cannot do things like mandate vaccines and ban cars if the very government that would enforce that ban is this tyrannical and shitty.

    • @mogranja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 days ago

      Also, there are people who make money (or even just fake internet points) off of telling gullible people the opposite is true.

      They should be held accountable for what they claim online.

      • @mogranja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 days ago

        And I mean someone who claims cigarettes don’t cause cancer are financially responsible if anyone who smokes a cigarette gets cancer. No need to prove they watched the channel or started smoking after seeing their video.