Just putting this here cause I found it a good overview of a pretty confusing situation I had no prior knowledge about

  • Pussista
    link
    fedilink
    -71 year ago

    Depends on your perspective I guess. The way I see it: Moderators are (partially) there to limit the spread of hate so if you are a hate spreader, you would thrive without moderation, but if you are a hate receiver, you’re better off when moderation rules are enforced.

    • @taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Without moderators most spaces would be completely unusable due to spammers, trolls and others whose behavior and motivations have very little to do with their sexuality, politics, their skin tone or their religion.

      • Pussista
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        That’s true and is the reason why I said “moderators are (partially) there …”.

      • @eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        You’re trying to dismiss an assertion by submitting a superset of the assertion. Which is usually done to belittle or ignore the orginal point in the argument, which is that a majoirty of those pushing back against CoC also romanticize the old boys group of experts.

        • @taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          The original point was to argue for CoC which is fine and can be done without antagonizing people with the tired old “white cis-het,…” nonsense in this context.