Coming back after some time, thanks for giving me another point of view. Sorry that shit happened to you.
Sr Estegosaurio
- 7 Posts
- 517 Comments
Sr Estegosaurio@lemmy.mlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Beyond Bash: 9 Lesser-Known Linux Shells and Their Capabilities3·2 years agoIt’s true! Sometimes the internet seams really smoll.
Sr Estegosaurio@lemmy.mlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Beyond Bash: 9 Lesser-Known Linux Shells and Their Capabilities3·2 years agoI’m a simple person, I see Nix I upvote.
Thanks for the comment, I may copy some stuff. :p
Do not use it. Use only the Tor Browser since it’s designed to make all users look the same. (Preferrably inside of a Whonix VM.)
I literally only read their linux hardening guide and that article on browsers. And both of them seemed me pretty good.
I might ignore their activities on social media tho. I’m reading the links right to help my ignorance.
Sr Estegosaurio@lemmy.mlto Linux@lemmy.ml•Beyond Bash: 9 Lesser-Known Linux Shells and Their Capabilities6·2 years agoI used
dash
as my/bin/sh
due to it being a lot lighter & faster thanbash
.Right now I’m trying out
ion
as my interactive shell and so far it works great.Fish
is cool tho.
Compared to Chromium.*
Not only LibreWolf but every FF based one.
You can check out this article since it explains it better than me: https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/firefox-chromium.html
While it’s not about the most recent version most if not all of its points are still true.
I agree on the fact that .onion addresses are not security and/or privacy silver bullets (Both twitter and reddit have one for example) you still need to trust the service provider. But with that said for certain things they can add a layer of anonimity that’s not really possible to archive without them.
But Brave the search engine and brave the browser are two different things tho.
From the same author as one of the best linux hardening guides: https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/firefox-chromium.html
Generally speaking is true that our security standars are incredibly low and that’s becoming more and more dangerous as time goes. Even moreso in our hyper-digitalized society.
But I fail to understand what does that have to do with the fact that FF is less secure than Chromium. May you develop, please?
The web itself has become a disappointing place to be honest. (Obviusly we stil have cool sites here and there but I mean generally.)
One problem with LibreWolf is that it has very weak security. The exact same goes for FF and other FF based browsers.
The Chromium monopoly sucks tho.
Edit: grammar. :p
Nobody remembers that rights were payed in blood. Literally nobody. Everyone thinks that at some point in history we suddenly obtained them or something.
And the fact that those rights were fought by the left is even more forgoten…
Sr Estegosaurio@lemmy.mlto Technology@lemmy.ml•Exclusive: Surveillance Footage of Tesla Crash on SF’s Bay Bridge Hours After Elon Musk Announces “Self-Driving” Feature1·2 years agoIf all that money was used to build public transport…
Sr Estegosaurio@lemmy.mlto Fediverse@lemmy.ml•Medium embraces Mastodon - The fediverse is a breath of fresh air for writers and social media4·2 years agoscribe.rip goes brrrrrrr.
Sr Estegosaurio@lemmy.mlto Technology@lemmy.ml•[Question] Does anyone know or use Heads?1·3 years agoI’ve heard about it while back when I was daily driving QubesOS. Probably read about it in their docs. That’s as far as I know.
Tbh email sucks from a security/privacy point of view. The protocol is stone age old and has not aged well. PGP is a security joke (compared to decent protocols).
This might be a bit hyperbolic, but you get the idea. I think that the email spec should be redone from the ground up. I know it’s not going to happen tho.
Some people really needs to read that. ^
And regarding the quote-reply: I’ve seen some other fediverse software implementing it and it had not provoked any toxicity. I think that in nhe end it really depends on its users.
And also on the fact that the fediverse does not have an algorithm that promotes hate speach.
This is a key factor in distinguishing good and bad bread. If you can eat bread alone then it’s good.