We’ve finally automated the one thing executives wanted most: plausible deniability. Profits go to the human owners, bad decisions go to the algorithm, and victims get to sue a corporate shell with a chatbot for a CEO. Delaware isn’t building the future of business. It’s building the ultimate accountability escape room.
Except nothing in this is plausible, just plenty of people who are not company executives want the same thinking they’ll get their shot at doing something with no responsibility.
Oh no, this AI company has started hiring hitmen to go after republican congressmen and senators 😱
Welp, nothing we can do. They’re incorporated in Delaware 🤷♂️
Hitmen would still be liable. Better to hire a swarm of drones or robodogs.
So nobody is responsible for a technology that runs all our digital systems…wtf fuck are we doing?
Racing to the bottom
According to Ayn Rand, the favorite philosopher of the techbros, any regulation - including the most sensible ones - are made by mean and jealous people wanting to see kind and successful people fail.
Ayn Rand is just a bolshevik inverted, but this aside, maintaining responsibility of a person for what they do with a new tool is not regulation.
No, cause you see. Governments are violence and violence can only be used against direct violence (ie. shooting someone who shoots someone). Since this is social violence, that means that governments can’t do anything. If you don’t want unaccountable robot-run companies, you gotta bootstrap yourself to the highest echelon of society and stop it by being more efficient and profitable than them! /s
Gods, I hate how much I fell for that shit as a teenager
I still fall for “that shit” if you mean libertarianism and not Ayn Rand (of that author I have the same opinion I had when first reading her book, it’s hongweibing levels of intelligence).
Libertarianism is very strictly based on personal responsibility for one’s decisions. And someone playing with a “young nuclear physicist” set near others is being pretty much violent even when no accidents happen. Combining these two, it’s pretty direct violence.
That’s not allowing even for a moment the thought that a person who turned on a machine that made an effect on the world loses one bit of responsibility for that effect because they used a machine.
After investigation it was discovered the AI was designed to extract maximum profit fo the owners and hide business failings until it collapsed, leaving investors and creditors holding the debt.
The courts fined the owners $50 each.
Repeat.
Just like all the crypto, AI, and app scams these days.
Make big promises to inverstors, make a memecoin, steal all the data, pump and dump with the money and the courts don‘t do shit. Seems to be the Zoomer business model. Well, Trump‘s MAGA losers too.
So financialization.
Rentseeking with extra steps.
More and more, alleged captains of industry are showing themselves to be confidence players who just defend capitalism because they got lucky in it.
Isn’t Delaware a famous tax haven?
Delaware is often used at a location for companies because it has a very well documented and court proven legal foundation.
It eliminates a lot of the uncertainty in running a business from a legal standpoint because most cases are already settled by someone else.
Texas is the new hotness from a tax standpoint cause it gets its money from other sources, like property tax.
How long before an AI decides to sell drugs online? I wonder how the courts will handle it?
Just a little cocaine. As a treat.
We can call that AI “Dread Pirate Robot”
Shut down that exact business and imprison the head AI model, probably.
The legal fiction of the corporate shield is leading our species to its doom. Profit without accountability encourages destructive behavior.
What’s the better idea? Without that legal fiction, new businesses would grind to a screeching halt and the entrenched monopolies would be even more powerful, as if that isn’t the root of our economic problems already.
The answer is not letting any company grow into a monopoly. There are actual laws against that. Break up existing monopolies. Then make business owners way more accountable than they are today. I know it is hard to prove intent in fraud cases, but any sort of creative accounting, transfer of debt between companies, bonuses that aren’t in alignment with company performance, stock buybacks and other manipulations of valuation, and a myriad other obvious fraudulent behaviors should be punished with long prison time.
I’ve been screaming about monopolies for 3-years now. Everything people bitch about capitalism boils down to monopolies.
BTW, stock buybacks used to be illegal until 1982. Ain’t that a thing?
What do you mean by “corporate shield”? Are you referring to limited liability? Corporations are still accountable for the laws that they break.
Um, how? Corporations don’t care if they go under. They also don’t care if they commit genocide or are responsible for major industrial disasters.
Make infinite money. Make no mistakes.
Delaware is the state where a bunch of companies are legally but not physically headquartered, ro evade state taxes and regulations.
States need to rethink their tax laws for companies: If you do business here, you pay taxes here.
this technology will get a lot of people killed and it will only stop when it destroys enough elite families.
At first, I wondered why Comer would be opposing this sort of oligarchy-engineering. Maybe he’s just sniffing around to get his cut? But it could be Niemöller’s ghost finally rising to a level that reaches Comer.
And the CEO said:
- First they came for the artists, and I did not speak out because I have no heart.
- Then they came for the writers, and I did not speak out because I have no soul.
- Then they came for the actors, and I did not speak out because I have no emotions.
- Then they came for the software engineers, and I did not speak out because I have no mind.
- Then they came for the infosec people, and I did not speak out because I have no wisdom.
- Then they came for me. And the artists, writers, actors, software engineers, and infosec people laughed derisively at me. So I called James Comer.
The oligarchs might love this, but the third string C-suite execs that dine with Comer at the finest gas-station barbecue place in Paducah? The AIs have finally come for them.
Anything except banking
Quick add AI to your bittorrent clients, and take deposits for your crypto/gambling exchanges!
An AI led business is a very important building block of rogue AI finishing off humankind. How else will it secure enough unsupervisable compute?
I hate it how these people take every warning of things that could go wrong as advise for policy.
So, basically just like human led companies?
The quote used as the title of the article isn’t accurate. The owner of the company would still be a human, so there would be a human at the helm.
I think he ment a human culpable for the actions of the company?
Which is strange since we don’t hold executives accountable in any meaningful way.
