Indeed! See: induction circuits
ml is not a hard coded set of if-else pairs. it’s a glorified fit with a lot of parameters.
That was old AI.
New AI uses a complex, multi-layer sequence of Magic 8-balls.
“Mirror mirror on the wall please fix my awful code, make no mistakes”
I would be heavily more inclined to use LLMs (and also probably use it in a more correct manner) if it came in the physical form of a magic 8-ball that I would violently shake to get the answer.
That’s a common misconception. It is a complex multi-layer sequence of heavily biased Magic 8-balls.
With a post-it note saying “be polite, don’t hallucinate”
More accurately:
>looks inside
>matrix multiplicationHad one guy asking if AI is conscious. I said the whole thing is actually one very big excel sheet, so does he think that excel can be conscious? Anyway, I think the guy is now in a relationship with office.
Yes, it is inherently incorrect, I just think that increases the fun factor. It reminds me of that guy who wrote a prime-checker for his thesis and it was just a massive list of if-statement
98% accurate prime checker, super fast
isPrime() return False;
You don’t have to be an AI developer to not understand your code. I not understand my code every day.
-Agent
It’s just
y = k*x + ma few trillion times.You’re forgetting the activation function to break linearity, otherwise you can only model linear trends. Many activation functions have “if” hidden in them (e.g. ReLU with the “max”).
Yes it’s not even for loop and if. Just multiplication and addition.
If statements are some of the largest sources of bugs in software.
I mean, without if statements and loops theres no logic? It would only be flat code, so i mean… Yeah?
If this is true then everything is fine.
Edit: Damn, I’m part of the problem, right?
