For me it’s time signatures in music. I grew up playing instruments, played in several orchestras, etc. But no matter how many times someone tries to explain time signatures to me, it makes no sense. I don’t understand why people place such importance on it. To me, notes have a pitch and a duration, maybe some dynamics. That’s it. I don’t understand why people try to needlessly complicate it. It doesn’t give you anything.

My wife will hear a song and go “Oh neat, it’s in 5/8.” And I’m like “How tf do you know that, and why does it matter?”

  • bizarroland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    26 days ago

    How to make friends. It was so easy as kids, but now I can meet people that do things that I do and who want to do them in a group but they never become friends to me anymore. IDK where I’m going wrong, I don’t reek of desperation, I have other friends, but when people say “find your tribe” like, I might be the last of my kind.

    • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      26 days ago

      Sometimes, a handful of friends is not just enough but the upper limit as well. And that’s okay, right? If you have a partner and everything is okay, you will start your own small community regardless. 😅

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      26 days ago

      I can completely relate. Additionally my specific standards also make it very bad.

      I found out that I’m an Autist so for me it at least explains things but is also totally not helping to know.

      Nevertheless I do not know for sure if all of this isn’t totally normal, as in the regular human experience. The older you get the more difficult it is to find and hold friends.

    • LouNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      Real friends are the ones that stick with you when shit hits the fan. When you’re an adult and you meet new people, you usually want to show yourself from your best side and for everything to go well. She we were kids, shit hitting the fan was somebody kicking a ball into a neighbors window or falling of a bike, minor things as an adult, but as kids that built character. The stakes are so much higher as an adult when things go wrong, so generally you avoid it even though this means that most of your relationships are superficial.

      I’m not saying that something horrible must happen in order to get friends as an adult. But sometimes it’s better to simply work against the odds together to form a deeper connection.

  • moondoggie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    26 days ago

    To me, notes have a pitch and a duration, maybe some dynamics.

    That could be part of the problem: time signatures aren’t a property of the notes, they’re a property of the song. The time signature is the rhythm and flow of the music. If you try to do a waltz in 4/4, it’s probably not going to sound like a waltz unless you do some really screwy things.

    Plus, knowing the time signature helps you figure out why that guy is waving his stick like that while you’re playing.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      26 days ago

      I give you those “screwy things”. Somebody stripped the fifth beats from Brubeck’s magnum opus, and made the most waltz sounding 4 I’ve ever heard.

      Take Four

    • LouNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      Metallica’s Nothing Else Matters is a walz and you can’t convince me otherwise.

        • emb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          That really bothered me at first! Kept thinking ‘why ever have a different time sig? No need for 13/8 (or whatever) when you can just sprinkle in double dotted 16th notes tied to 8th note (or whatever).’

          Over time I slowly realized that it’s not about technically being able to write it, but rather describing what usually happens. (Tho I still don’t really understand, intuit, or hear any of it well.)

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      So, the original Mission Impossible theme tune is in 5/4. When U2 re-did it for the 1996 Tom Cruise film, the beginning is in 5/4, and then they transition to a slower 4/4. For most of the “Dee da duuuuuuuuuuuh” sections, as far as I can tell it’s just a beat shorter, but the tempo is lower, when they do reprise the Dun! Dun! Da Da! section they use two measures, 8 beats, making it dun dun dun dun da da.

      Fun fact: The original dun dun da da was supposed to be “MI” in morse code. --… dash dash dot dot, with a dash being a beat and a half, a dot being one beat, five beats total. U2 turned it into MMI. ----…

  • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Skateboarding. None of it computes for me. My brother has been a lifelong skater and still rips it up at almost 40, and I see him do shit on the board and I just can’t figure out what the fuck is happening. It breaks physics, it’s like bee flight, none of that crap should be possible.

    I watched him go up a very steep incline and do the thing where it’s a kickflip and a pop shove it at the same time, which is enough on its own to break my brain, but he and the board went up and landed at the same angle of the incline like it was flat ground, he and the board went up and down perpendicular to the incline without any vertical drag on the drop and landing. Gravity doesn’t fucking work that way! And how the fuck do their feet and the board just get back together after the board is seizuring mid air and just fucking land and keep going like there are magnets on their feet or something? It’s gods damned wizard shit.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      Strapping a snowboard to my feet was pretty intuitive, just keep the downhill edge up. Hard agree, I even wore skater shoes but a basic Ollie was something my brain and limbs just…don’t do that

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      I have a friend who’s a skater and when he doing a kickflip I asked how it worked, as in, how do you make sure the board doesn’t land upside-down or whatever and he was like, “You just launch off and then deal with it.” which was not at all helpful lol. There must be some sort of logic to it!

  • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    26 days ago

    Thats where patterns repeat. It’s just for convenience, an 8th note is an 8th note no matter the signature but its how you count the beats. If a piece is in 3/4 the phrases will feel different from 4/4. So, if youre sight reading, it makes it easier to predict when phrases begin and end, when to come in off rests, etc.

    I hope that helps somehow lol.

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      26 days ago

      Also helpful to know where it’s appropriate to take a breath on a wind instrument if it’s not marked.

  • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    26 days ago

    Getting up early or ever feeling rested. I don’t think ive ever felt good in the morning. Basically, if I have 5 drinks and sleep, I’d feel identical waking up as if I’d had nothing. I also feel the same with 5 hours of sleep vs 10. No difference. And I do sleep its not insomnia, just doesnt work.

    • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      Could be something like needing a cpap machine. My husband got one and it changed how he slept entirely. Could be a lot of reasons for sleep not being refreshing though!

    • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      You might be nocturnal. I used to work nights and felt better getting up at 4pm every day, even if I had less sleep than I get now getting up at 8am

      • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        I definitely am. If I’m left to my own devices I almost instantly default to going to bed at 5am-ish and getting up at 11-12. But mostly society won’t let me do that, so I feel like I’m on a night shift permanently.

  • LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    26 days ago

    Love and affection. As someone who’s parents have a bunch of psychological problems, paired with growing up poor as an immigrant. I never in my life have experienced either love or any sort affection for either family nor strangers. For context my mother is a prefect example of a sociopath and I’m 80% sure my dad is autistic. Neither of those conditions exactly scream empathy. I never heard the words ‘I love you’ spoken with the eyes, or any sort of meaning behind them. Listening to daily (and I’m not exaggerating here) screaming matches for 30 years has given me the impression that those words don’t really mean anything to them anyway. Never having had a safe place to develop those feelings and given that I’m not exactly easy on the eyes means that I have somehow managed to become full grown, mentally stable adult with empathy, and a yearning for affection and acceptance without a single fibre of love in my body. Never have I had an interaction other than quid pro quos, “I want something from you, you want something from me.” never “I want you, you want me.” I literally can’t imagine what it’s like waking up next to somebody, feeling emotionally safe or having somebody genuinely wanting to spend time with you. I know that there are currently literally billions of people for whom this the most normal thing in the world but for me that is borderline incomprehensible. I would want to wish that kind of lonelines on my worst enemy.

    I’m a dude BTW.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    26 days ago

    I cannot, and I mean cannot, flip a map in my mind. North has to be pointing north or my brain just keeps messing up.

    There was a test in the back of Scientific American magazine a long time ago with pairs of 3d models (the stick and ball things people use to show molecular structures) and they turned them in different directions and asked “are these identical or mirror images” how many can you answer in 5 minutes.

    I stared at it for an hour and couldn’t do even one. Like, I was crying by the end of the hour because I felt so stupid but my mind, it just couldn’t tell.

    I’ve never had trouble reading but learned to read very young (barely 3 year old) like a language, sort of before even knowing the alphabet that well - it’s not a dyslexia situation. But I sure couldn’t see those differences in the quiz. At all.

    • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Could it be dyscalculia instead of dyslexia? From what I’ve heard poor sense of direction is a common symptom of the former.

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        25 days ago

        I was not great at math in early school, rote memorization not my strong point but loved algebra, enjoyed calculus and actually work as an accountant. When in elementary school I could always rock word problems in math, better at understanding/applying than the literally calculating. So I don’t know, but not likely.

        Pretty bad with right and left but honestly very good at moving around in real space - I orient myself (obviously) on north, south, east, west. I have a great sense of direction in the actual world.

    • jpreston2005@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      I once went to a place to meet some people. The people I came to meet were in two distinct groups, chatting. I didn’t know which group to join, so I stood in between them, listening to both. First one was talking about something boring and stupid, the second the same. So I just… stood there. Outside both groups, staring at the floor, wondering if I should just leave.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        I probably would have stopped wondering and started wandering home after not very long.

  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    I’m gonna go meta on this one:

    I don’t understand how some people just know that they can do things from the get-go. Like from their early teens on.

    It took me until age 50 to understand who is holding me back: me.

    There’s very little I don’t think I can grasp now. Anything another human can do, so can I. I could have been a doctor or a musician or a chemical engineer or Michelin starred chef if had believed in myself like other people do.

    How??? Why did they know they could do these things???

    • sneekee_snek_17@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      I had this realization when I decided to rebuild the carburetor on my old mustang. After taking it apart I was absolutely paralyzed by then realized that some schmuck designed it, so surely I could just put it back together

    • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      We didn’t. What could go wrong if we fail? Nothing? Cool. See you at the finish.

      We could die? CATCH ME IF YOU CAN, BITCHES!!

      Maybe you care too much about your own life. Try having no will to live.

      I am joking. Mostly.

    • yyyesss?@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      that’s fascinating and DIDN’T HELP AT ALL HOLY SHIT.

      it’s like saying “oh you don’t understand basic physics? here watch Einstein explain his most complex concepts”

      • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        Oh that reminds me of the time my then boyfriend, a mathematician, tried to teach me maths. It was like teaching someone French by reading out a few pages of Sartre’s La nausée, then saying “OK, that’s the basics covered…”

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        It’s just an example of guys who definitely must count stuff so that it always fits exactly into the loop while also being precisely timed between the guitar tracks and the drums

        As for physics, iirc the book series by Feynman is recommended to really dig all the stuff from the basics to the fancy theories, and Feynman was no slouch himself.

        Also, Einstein was teaching students in the US later in life.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        The band took off in January with the KEXP performance, after playing shows for two years. Their outlandish garbs and wacky setup likely contributed to the popularity — wouldn’t expect to see much interest in microtonal math-rock otherwise.

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      I just discovered these guys last week and have had their two albums playing on repeat ever since.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Programming fast.

    When I program for my personal projects it takes hours to get very little done.

    • Snowman_sir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      hmm, I have the same thing. But I do test a LOT and make backups on backups, tbh. Most of my time probably goes into that.

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    25 days ago

    I understand time signatures in theory, but not in practice. I comprehend what they are and what they mean, but they don’t make sense to me. I don’t understand what they do or why they’re necessary.

    Like I get it, the bottom number tells you how many beats are in a whole note. Most commonly 4, but sometimes 8 or something else.

    The top number tells you how many beats are in a measure. In common time, that’s again 4.

    But mathematically, wouldn’t that mean 3/4 time is the same as 6/8 time? They’re equivalent as fractions. But when I ask a musician they don’t explain it, they just tell me “No, they’re different. That’s 3/4, this is 6/8.” And usually with this undertone like “Are you stupid? This is so obvious, what part are you not getting?”

    From what I gather, 6/8 time is usually done in pairs of triplets. So it does sound rhythmically different than 3/4. But no one ever tells you that, not even when the concept is introduced in textbooks on music theory. They just tell you “and this is 6/8 time,” as if you’re just supposed to know how and why that’s in any way different from 3/4 time…

    • chunes@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      This is why I prefer to use trackers instead of sheet music when possible. All I want to look at is what pitch the notes are and how long they are. I don’t like key signatures either. It’s better, for me, for each pitch to have its own space.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        I took piano lessons for many years and I could sight-read sheet music … sorta. As long as the notes were within the staves, I knew exactly what key to play. It was when notes were above and below the staves that I had to stop and count how many little lines were attached to each note to figure it out. Obviously that messed up my rhythm a bit lol.

        I’m a programmer and I’ve spent thirty years writing music composition software and I never once even thought about incorporating traditional sheet music representation. It’s just so clunky and poorly designed for the job. And when you start getting into microtones it’s completely hopeless.

      • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Songs are made from repeating patterns of beats and melody. The time signature tells you what that pattern looks like. If you just memorise all the notes I suppose it matters less. But if you wanted to improvise like with a guitar solo or whatever that’s the rhythm you can use to improvise with.

        It’s the rhythm equivalent of the key/chord progression for the melody. If you know the chord and when/how it changes through a song, and you know the basic rhythm building block you can just make up notes that are guaranteed to sound great with the other instruments playing.

    • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      From what I gather, 6/8 time is usually done in pairs of triplets. So it does sound rhythmically different than 3/4. But no one ever tells you that, not even when the concept is introduced in textbooks on music theory. They just tell you “and this is 6/8 time,” as if you’re just supposed to know how and why that’s in any way different from 3/4 time…

      I think it is too. I figured it out when I read that Jocko Homo is in 7/8 and it’s very clear because of the staccato notes, 3 by guitar 4 by synth. Another way to think of it is the first beat is accented. So 4/4 is ONE two three four ONE two three four. 5/4 is ONE two three four five ONE two three four five.

      I think a lot of musicians don’t really fully understand it so they can’t explain it. Kinda like how programmers can’t really explain casting. And don’t you programmers dare tell me about cows in a pasture or a barn or whatever that analogy is. Just translate your line of code with the word “cast” into a sentence that makes sense. You can’t.

      • neobunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        About Casting, at least in the granddaddy of programming languages, C, just meant interpreting the value of a variable as if it was a different kind of variable. Important detail is that variables are actually just memory locations and the number of bytes that conform it. So if you have a variable x of type string that holds the letter A, and a variable y also of type string with the letter B, if you do

        x+y

        You get ‘AB’. But if you cast the variables like this:

        (int)x + (int)y

        You get 131

        To put it in words as you asked, you are saying “please add the values located at memory locations x and y, but treat the values found there as if they were numbers, and not the ASCII codes for letters (which is what I had originally told you was there)”.

        It’s been almost 30 years since the last time I actually used this, so I might be recalling something wrong.

    • VirtigoMommy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Played for over 20 years, aced my music theory final while I was still in school. Have minimal issues translating and coordinating with other musicians professionally.

      Me too bud.

      They say it’s about groove and feel but that’s highly subjective and falls apart the second polyrhythms get involved.

      In the end, anything can technically be written in any time signature, imh It just comes down to what’s easiest (or most obnoxious/ gimmicky) to read / write.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        I mean I get why you would want to use 3/4 time instead of 4/4 time. For instance if you’re composing a waltz, you would want to use 3/4 time, because the rhythmic pattern repeats every 3 beats. Or for something like “da daa, da daa, da daa, da daa”

        It’s more convenient to use a time signature that aligns with the repeating rhythm. But that only requires the top number.

        To me, the bottom number has always been utterly meaningless. Sure you can fit two triplets in a 6/8 measure as opposed to one triplet in 3/4, but you could compose the same thing in 3/4 and just use two measures for the motif instead of one, and make it a faster tempo, and suddenly it’s played exactly the same way…

    • BigBrainBrett2517@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      I am not a musician and there are MANY people that know MUCH more about music theory than me.

      e.g. 6/8 time. 6 is how many beats are in a bar. 8 is how many bars. Why important? So we know when the music gets back to the start of the cycle… Kinda. There must be a beginning and an end. Why is No. of beats important? So we have an idea of the feel and how many notes roughly we can play within that. Why is 6/8 different to 3/4? Accents on a 3/4 the accent is typically on the 1 ² ³ 1 ² ³ and in a 6/8 the accent is going to mildly be on the 1 but more noticeable on the 4. Think MJ’s “The Way You Make Me Feel”. 6/8 has drive and the feeling of the accent on the UP beat.

      Beyond this simplicity music is maths. Do you need to know the rules? No. Do whatever you want. But if you know the rules, you can exploit them; like musicians and composers do to create complex compositions and polyrhythms.

      Hope this helps in any way.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        No, the top number is beats per measure. The bottom number is how many beats are in a whole note. For example, in 6/8 time a whole note has 8 beats, making an eighth note one beat. As opposed to 3/4 time in which a quarter note is one beat.

        But the exact same thing can be accomplished just by changing the tempo.

        As for the accents, yeah, that’s what I gather the only difference is. But it’s never explicitly taught that way, and there’s nothing hardcoded into the logic of time signatures that suggests it must be that way.

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          25 days ago

          Yeah a lot of music notation has implicit/hidden elements that aren’t ever really explained. A lot of things are done because someone “feels” like it should be that way, and no one questions it for whatever reason.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        A non trivial amount of the reasoning is simplicity of reading and writing music. You could transpose everything to 4/4, but it would require a lot of weird patterns.

      • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        It’s more 123 vs 123-456. In 3/4 the first of each triple is rhythmically always as strong, while in 6/8 the 1 is stronger than 4

    • crestlessbags@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Yeah a lot of ways to write it, and that’s part of it - depending on the tempo and phrasing it may be easier or harder to read the music in different time signatures, so there’s some flexibility. Like in 3/4 if you have phrasing that would carry a note from beat three across to beat one of the next bar, in a lot of places, that’s messier to write and read than if it’s e.g a quarter note within a 6/8 bar.

      And a whole note is always the length of the bar, so in 6/8 a whole note isn’t eight beats, it’s six. The bottom number represents what length note counts as one beat - in 6/8 an 8th note is one beat (and there would be 6 8th notes per bar) a quarter note is two beats, a half note is three and a whole note is six.

      I’m betting different composers had preferences as well.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        You’re confusing a bar with a measure. The measure is the smaller interval.

        Also, the bottom number is how many beats are in a whole note. Because there are 8 beats in a whole note, that means an eighth note is one beat. A whole note is 8 beats in 6/8 time. Just like it’s 4 beats in 3/4.

        The top number is how many beats per measure. i.e., 6 eighth notes in 6/8 time; 3 quarter notes in 3/4 time.

        • crestlessbags@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          Wait, so then what’s the difference between a bar and measure?!

          I think I get it, so a whole note is 8 beats and there’s 6 to a measure, so the whole note carries on for two beats into the next measure, ya?

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            Yes, pretty much.

            If a note is a letter and a measure is a word, then a bar is like a sentence. Typically 4 or more measures make up a bar, and they sometimes span more than one line. When you see a measure that ends with two vertical lines, that’s the end of a bar.

  • WhatISawInTheWoods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    26 days ago

    Learning a second language. Having a processing disorder and a shit short term memory makes it hard for me to comprehend. I’m accepting advice if anyone succeeded with a stubborn learning disability.

    • LouNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      26 days ago

      First, screw grammar, I’ve learned 3 languages without ever learning their grammar, including English.

      Find a topic that you are very knowledgeable at in your native language and start consuming knowledge on that topic in the language you try to learn. Go back to the basics of that topic, something you know by heart. There will be a reversal where instead of listening to the language and trying to understand what is happening, you will already know what is happening and just listen to the words. You will go from “What did he/she say?” to “Oh, that’s how you say it!”. Its way easier to append connections in you brain that create new ones, so the familiarity of the topic is a stepping stone to learn the language. Of course you will still have to pause and translate constantly but it will be less and less necessary with time.

    • gramie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      Try Language Transfer . A natural method of learning a language, the best I’ve ever seen.

      It’s also free!

      In a nod to the OP, there is also a short course on music theory.