Let’s hope other states follow suit…

  • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    My tinfoil hat is telling me they’ll do this to make an outlaw of Linux and block it from services and sites. I hope my hat is wrong.

    • Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Keep that tinfoil hat close, I have a feeling Digital identification laws and ReadID technologies are actually moving the internet away from user anonymity, enabling a framework where users can be tied to real-world identities and easily sanctioned.

      Make a post on the internet that someone objects to? boom, you just lost access to all your bank accounts.

      I mean people connected to Peter Thiel are already bragging how they would love to do that

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s physically impossible to “outlaw Linux”. That would mean outlawing the entirety of “The Cloud™”.

        • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          How would you even legislate that? “You can only use Linux if you’re a registered business”? And how hard is it to register a one-person business in the US?

          “You can only use Linux if your business has over X number of employees”? So make a non-profit business that “hires” anyone who wants to use Linux.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wait… So if Linux doesn’t have the api (sorry, the “signal” 🙄) how will sites that require it respond? What does it mean to be “exempt” - every user is considered to be an adult?

  • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Linux is now the backbone of everything. It you mess Linux up, so many things will break. They realized this finally.

    • ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      A new malaphor minted in the wild!

      The two expressions you merged were:

      • death knell for (thing)
      • the final nail in the coffin for (something)
      • degen@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        “The final death in the coffin” would have some… interesting implications in a couple ways

        Edit: also “death nail” means Microsoft started smoking

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Linux users are incredible in their belief that issues of privacy, security, or data autonomy will push the masses away from what they’re used to (OSX/Windows, Facebook/Reddit, etc) and towards better options (Linux, Lemmy, Mastodon, etc)

      No, mate, absolutely nothing is gonna happen to Windows. It’s gonna be perfectly fine. If we’re lucky, there will be a 1-3% dip in user base towards Linux, but there’s exactly 0% chance for a mass exodus that would make the upper management stop and think for a second.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think they were assuming that people would use linux to dodge these restrictions. Ex. a teen who can’t use a site on windows/ios might boot linux in an attempt to make it work. But as others have pointed out, it’s more likely that sites will just blanket-flag a linux useragent as being used by a child to be safe. And then a linux user changing their useragent to get around this will then be hw attestation challenged like any other OS. So yeah, it’s just going to make it more inconvenient to use an open system.

  • chgxvjh [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    AB 1856 doesn’t explicitly say that repos aren’t app stores, but a store’s main obligation under the law is to request an age signal from the user’s OS provider and pass it to developers; an exempt open-source OS produces no signal.

    So what’s the outcome of that? Are covered applications and application store to treat users as children when they don’t get a signal from the OS?

  • wallwood@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Great This could drive more people to linux than ever Especially if the law will eventually require users to verify their age with an ID. I wonder if big tech will still be this exited about implementing age verification once they start seeing people ditching their softwares in favor of FOSS alternatives!