• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    Fuck these incompetent headline writers who cant use units correctly. At this point they are doing this shit on purpose to ragebait people into reading the article. And they dont even explain what that headline is supposed to mean in the article. Does the output power ramp up that fast or do they mean that it can actually just output a lot of energy really fast?

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      Actually, the headline isn’t wrong, you just read it wrong.

      The article specifies:

      • 2.1 GWh total storage capacity
      • 1.2 GW peak output
      • can ramp up to that peak output within milliseconds

      Every power source has a ramp up time. Ramping up e.g. a nuclear reactor can take hours, so if demand fluctuates it takes long for it to spin up.

      This one here can ramp up almost instantly to cover for fluctuations in the network, especially those caused by the unpredictable nature of renewable power generators.

  • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    14 days ago

    The article doesn’t explain the battery, making it a bullshit site if you ask me, here is what they are talking about:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanadium_redox_battery

    'The vanadium redox battery (VRB), also known as the vanadium flow battery (VFB) or vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB), is a type of rechargeable flow battery which employs vanadium ions as charge carriers.[5] The battery uses vanadium’s ability to exist in a solution in four different oxidation states to make a battery with a single electroactive element instead of two.[6]

    For several reasons, including their relative bulkiness, vanadium batteries are typically used for grid energy storage, i.e., attached to power plants/electrical grids.[7] ’

    • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      If I heard this on a different situation I would have thought this is an AI hallucination.

    • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      I think that’s the same kind of battery technology as explained in this video. Most certainly not the same chemistry used, but same in principle

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I read some years back about I think the first big heavy industrial vanadium battery being built for some washington state company if I recall.

  • squaresinger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    The headline looks wrong, but it actually isn’t.

    The article specifies:

    • Total capacity: 2.1GWh
    • Peak output: 1.2GW
    • Ramp up time: a few milliseconds

    That’s what the “within milliseconds” in the title refers to.

    Every power generator has a ramp up time. Think the time it takes to start the engine in a diesel generator, until it spins up and is able to output peak power.

    Nuclear reactors can hare ramp-up times of hours, in some conditions even days.

    This thing here can go from zero to peak output within almost no time, which makes it perfect to balance the sometimes erratic and unpredictable generation fluctuations of renewable energy production.

    For comparison, coal or gas power generators usually have large flywheels that, once spinning, react almost instantly to power fluctuations in the network by converting their motion to electricity or the other way round. If these coal or gas generators aren’t running, they can’t be used to balance the fluctuations in the network, so battery solutions like the one in OP are required to actively manage the network stability.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    They just had the first stone laying ceremony so that explains the new wave of publications on the project.

    They are using a Vanadium flow battery by the company Invinity Energy Systems which is British-Canadian.

    I’m a little unsure whether it’s a good idea to combine this with a datacenter, I hope the datacenter bubble popping won’t jeopardize the whole project.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 days ago

    The Swiss are on the frontline of climate change seeing that it is destroying their mountains which in turn are destroying their villages. Sad times.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Asked for comments, they kept saying “Rest assured there is no death ray plans”

    (/j)

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      The headline is most likely a misunderstanding, but “Output X Watt in Y time” isn’t all that wrong, since it would be talking about how quickly the power supply can respond to demand.

      Every power supply has a ramp-up time, and the way the headline is worded hints to a very short ramp-up time, which would be very helpful for network stabilization.

      But yeah, it’s likely the headline writer just misunderstood something.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Don’t stick your thing in it!!

    Remember Wally? Ooof. I mean, kind of a jerk and all but. What a way to go.