Plex has announced a massive price increase on the service’s Lifetime Plex Pass. On July 1, the lifetime subscription option will go from $249.99 to $749.99, an increase of 200%. The price hike will only apply to new subscribers, with no changes to monthly or annual subscription pricing.

  • WandowsVista@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    there are a lot of us still on Plex that hadn’t reached the threshold of issues vs effort that would motivate us to migrate to something like jellyfin.

    looks like we’ve arrived.

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I haven’t. I bought lifetime Plex Pass something like 15 years ago. A price change doesn’t effect me. It’s all their shitty updates and removing of features that makes me keep an eye on Jellyfin. I already have a sync setup for my watch status and a couple of my main users. Jellyfins apps are still worse.

    • frozenfoxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why not run both? That’s what I do, then if Plex is an issue for someone I can make them a Jellyfin account

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have the lifetime pass, bought it for like $80 many moons ago.

      looks like we’ve arrived.

      Agreed, this is the tipping point. This is where we will see Plex start to abandon the lifetime pass in favor of “imaginary money line go up forever” subscriptions.

    • hefty4871@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I already have a lifetime Plex pass so this isn’t an issue for me. 6 months from now when Plex decides my lifetime pass has a new expiry, then I’ll be motivated.

      • WandowsVista@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        this exactly. I got a lifetime pass in the before times (pre-pandemic) back when they were $100 bucks ish, but I know it’s only a matter of time before they come for us grandfathered-in fools.

  • greyhathero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Probably going to get hate for this. But I have easily gotten 750 dollars worth of value out of my lifetime subscription. I’m sure they are doing this to drive down lifetime subscriptions and increase month to month. But I legit think 750 over 20 years it’s still a legit price.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Plex has been around quite a while longer than JF. Before JF, the only way to really have a “self-hosted Netflix” was with Plex, so there are a lot of us who built our long-standing media setups around that.

      That said, I have a JF instance running and matched almost 1:1 with Plex specifically for this situation, so I’m going to start pivoting everyone to that as I wind Plex down.

      • rollerbang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Meh, I’ve used dlna with PS2 over 20 years ago. Not exactly the same, but for my needs essentially the same.

      • yabai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s a great project called WatchState that allows you to sync show progress between JF and Plex. Highly recommend it for while you’re switching over.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve gotten my money’s worth out of the $74.99 I paid for Plex Pass Lifetime several years ago. If they ever get rid of my Plex Pass and try to say “Lifetime didn’t actually mean Lifetime”, I’ll be gone.

    • Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I like to think I got my money out of mine as well, even though I only used it for like a year or two before switching to jellyfin.

  • db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I got this on Black Friday many years ago for ~70 and despite the pass I am slowly moving over to Jellyfin. I really don’t see how they came up with this valuation, seems like a last money squeeze before abandoning ship.

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Everything changed when they signed that A24 deal, and its not even the good movies, its the shitty also-rans. They want revenue now.

      • db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I wish them luck, but it seems despite all the data collection they failed to understand who their customers are. Idgaf about their content, I block and remove it where I can. Instead now we have content that will not convince anyone to cancel their Netflix or HBO to move to them and I have a home server that barely runs anymore because the software is so bloated.

  • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Jellyfin vs Plex thing always struck me as odd. As in - why are we holding JF to a different standard to (say) Immich, Syncthing, Pi-hole or any one of a thousand different programs people self host?

    Yes, JF ships multi-user accounts and client apps etc. I get it, “multi-use” is implied, so the comparison isn’t totally unfair. But there’s a difference between ‘this feature exists’ and ‘this is the primary purpose of the tool’.

    The fact that you CAN share it externally doesn’t mean everyone running JF is doing that, or that it should be the benchmark the whole project is judged by.

    To me, self host means “I host it, myself” not “I host it and then pretend to be Netflix for family and friends”. If that’s the use case, then of course, Plex away.

    It’s cool that you CAN share JF externally, and it’s cool that Plex does that differently / better. We shouldn’t hold one to the standards of the other.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    The company’s blog post also described a number of improvements they plan to make

    After you pay: “oops, we won’t”

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      As a lifetime owner, the number of features they’ve deprecated is probably the worst part.

      • Photo support (luckily Immich came along)
      • Tidal integration (no idea if that was Plex or Tidal’s decision)
      • Plugins (god forbid anyone add the functionality they keep removing)

      It’s close between that and the last app overhaul that removed a bunch of functionality.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 days ago

      From a purely profit-oriented perspective, no. They’re setting up a pretext to eliminate the lifetime license plan due to a lack of interest. No sane person would pay that kind of lump sum for the service (and the insane ones will bring in triple the revenue), so they’ll claim that there is no market for it. After that, they’re free to crank up the periodic subscription prices.

      Never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by profiteering opportunism.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by profiteering opportunism.

        Does this already have a name? If not, can we call it “Riccitiello’s Law”?

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Stakeholders. Journalists. The market. The ignorant public. They’re constructing a narrative to shield themselves and minimize the hit to their reputation when they stop offering lifetime license plans. The announcement won’t look nearly as damning if it contains a reference to the falling number of new lifetime customers, even if it omits the context of why that number has been falling.

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            So they are “shielding” themselves from a reputation drop by making an incredibly naked attempt and pushing the price to the roof so nobody wants it?

            I mean, come on… if they had increased it $20 by $20 until nobody wants it, I would buy your hypothesis, but this is like pooping on my Director’s desk while he is in the office to get fired

            How is this less blatant than just announcing they are cancelling life time subscriptions? or even better, just removing the option without any announcement?

            • freebee@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              They wanna gentle into it somewhat because they know there are many server managing people on the line already, doubting going jellyfin but scared of the hassle of transferring users, incompatibility (or too difficult for user) with some users devices.

              They wanna move fast because money line needs to go up, boss said.

              So currently, tripling lifetime prices seems to be the middle way for them. After a while monthly and yearly prices will rise too (but slower than tripling).

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not really. Their plan for a while now is to convert all to subscriptions and this is just their latest salvo. Next up is getting rid of it completely due to “no demand” and then kicking existing lifetime accounts to some static version that won’t be supported.

        • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Good point! Everyone that sees the news on this is either going to already be using Plex or not internalize it because it isn’t relevant to them.

          It seems like they’re jumping through an awful lot of hoops to bamboozle some tiny number of potential customers that happen to be in the market for self-hosted media streaming right then at the time of the announcement of the end of the lifetime subscription.

  • SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    they must be tired of running that company.

    Is the whole world right now like me at the very end of a SimCity 3000 game, when it’s time to just turn on all the catastrophies?

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Its so much less cool than that.

      Business leaders have finally gotten the legal oversight landscape set up so the cash register is being monitored by a blind baby that was dropped on its head, so they’re all just lining up robbing the place.

      The end-game plan seems to be to keep it up until things go all Mad Max, then hide in underground vaults until that blows over and start it again.