Like how we all face the door in an elevator or feel the need to say ‘ope’ when we almost bump into someone. What’s a silent rule of society that you find hilarious or totally unnecessary?

  • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not discussing pay rate with coworkers/colleagues. I mean, talk about complicity via fear. 🫪

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not discussing pay rate with coworkers/colleagues. I

      My day job is Union. Everyone’s rates are well-published. We have less boring things to talk about.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Might be true for non-union gigs, but from my experience in union shops nobody cares because everyone can see what the pay rates are. Same with retirement plans.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I feel like anyone who isn’t heavily involved in left wing internet spaces understands why you don’t want to discuss pay with coworkers.

      Someone fears their coworkers will find out they are making less, and will think they are less skilled, or maybe a pushover.

      Or someone fears their coworkers will find out they are making more, and will fear their coworkers think they were manipulative in order to get it, think they are egotistical for sharing, or may become envious.

      And then pay discrepencies invite unwanted feelings about “do I actually deserve to make more than him - I don’t think I’m worth it” or “I make so much less rhan her, I must suck at my job.”

      Not discussing pay is a convenient way to sweep all this under the rug

        • blarghly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s my point. Unless you are an online leftist, you probably aren’t constantly analyzing the world in terms of bosses exploiting their workers. You are far more concerned about your social standing among your peers.

          • Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sort of? I’m a team lead (middle management) so I have a vested interest in seeing my team is paid as high as possible. As part of goal planning we have frank discussions of certifications, training AND salary. That includes discussing where I’m at and what it took to get there. Its pushed folks who otherwise would be content with what the company gives them and gives them a roadmap to move up.

            • ODGreen@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Wow you’re the exact opposite of my experience of middle management! Which is: never discuss salary, don’t encourage certification or training, do not explain how you got there, do not give employees a roadmap, just pile on the work and stoke fear.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I remember being a kid and hearing about a family member’s workplace instituting a rule against discussing pay after some people got upset they were making less than their coworkers and started advocating for higher pay.

        Neither I nor anyone in my immediate family was a leftist, but it seemed really obvious the primary reason for the rule was that management didn’t want people to have reasons to demand higher pay.

    • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      It has been introduced in my country during the early 80s, so I have to disagree on that one.
      That’s just about 40 years ago, so pretty sure there are still people left who agreed to it.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, I was over-simplifying to make my statement more dramatic and semi-funny, because so many people hate the clock-switching.

        It’s complicated. DST is mostly observed in North America, Europe, and part of Australia, and mostly since pre- or during WWII, BUT yes there are a few countries that started later. There are also some original ones that stopped observing it and then started again later. Also, some of the people still alive from when it started would have been too young to be able to agree to it.

        So I’ll amend my statement to “The vast majority of people alive today didn’t agree to DST”. Doesn’t have the same punch.

        • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          l agree that it’s complicated.
          The DST in the early 80s actually was the 3rd time people introduced it here, one of the predecessors of our current state even being the first country to ever use it in its current form during WWI.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hands clasped behind the back means, “just looking”. Seems pretty universal. People do this in stores all the time.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    The elevator one seems pretty universal, but “ope” is regional.

    These kinds of social norms aren’t universal.

    One that I wish were more universal would be standing on the right when using an escalator, and leaving the left side for walking.

    • prettykat@lemmy.worldBannedOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Interesting point! I guess ‘ope’ is my regional bias showing lol. The escalator thing is a great example of a rule that makes life so much more efficient, yet people still ignore it. I wonder why some rules like ‘facing the door’ stick so well, while others like ‘stand on the right’ are a constant struggle. Do you think it’s because one is about comfort and the other is about efficiency?

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        On the contrary, I’d say the elevator thing is only comfortable because it’s a social norm. Unless it’s a subconscious “face the door so you can see if any attackers enter” thing.

        The escalator thing is less universal because it’s something that helps other people, and not ourselves. This isn’t valued as much in individualistic societies like the ones in most of North America.

        • Mothra@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Disagree. First of all, you are in an elevator for a very short time, unlike with public transport for example. You might as well be facing the direction you need to go to, so that when the doors open, you go, instead of having to turn and then go.

          Second… I regularly take crowded elevators and while it’s true that almost nobody stands facing back to the door, it’s also true that easily half the people choose to stand sideways, facing the side walls. (Which btw makes someone with a pram or wheelchair easier to get into the elevator). It’s a mix of being ready to go and being able to rest your back against the walls of the elevator more than an unspoken social convention.

          Edit: hey well, at least in Australia. Maybe wherever you live everyone faces the door in an elevator.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Order of Adjectives. You do this unconsciously and don’t even know you’re doing it.

    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/grammar/british-grammar/adjectives-order

    “The big black house up on the hill.”

    Never “The black big up on the hill house.”

    1 - opinion - unusual, lovely, beautiful
    2 - size - big, small, tall
    3 - physical quality - thin, rough, untidy
    4 - shape - round, square, rectangular
    5 - age - young, old, youthful
    6 - colour - blue, red, pink
    7 - origin - Dutch, Japanese, Turkish
    8 - material - metal, wood, plastic
    9 - type - general-purpose, four-sided, U-shaped
    10 - purpose - cleaning, hammering, cooking

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      My favorite one of these unconscious linguistic rules is expletive infixation. We say “fan-fucking-tastic” but “fanta-fucking-stic” sounds completely wrong.

  • zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    I like the tradition of “bless you!” when someone sneezes, but it is surely not necessary. And why do we say that for sneezing but not coughing?

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was at the urinal the other day and sneezed; someone said bless you from a stall.

      It was awkward. Breaking one social norm to uphold another.

        • metallic_substance@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          If he doesn’t take the handshake the only appropriate thing to do is to wait outside the bathroom, follow him to the parking lot and then follow him home. Once you learn his address, you can start learning his routines and the routines of his family. There are many options at this point, but the one I recommend is applying for a job where he works. The next step could take a long time, potentially years. Work your way up the ladder. Take night classes to fit the roles you’re applying for internally, and dedicate yourself to the job. Delay finding “the one” and starting a family like you’ve always dreamed of. Nothing matters but the job. Bide your time and when you finally are promoted to this man’s boss, on your first day, offer a handshake. Of course, he won’t deny you. Relish this moment. Feel the warmth of his hand I yours. Smile and say “was it really that hard?” When he gives you a quizzical look, laugh it off like it was a joke. You want to call it there, but you’re in too deep. You’re making nearly 300k a year in salary and commissions and you have a clear shot at EVP if you play your cards right. Your lifestyle has changed and you have an expensive mortgage, a boat payment for a yacht you don’t have time to take out, and a number of women half your age that you spend what little free time you have with wining and dining. They have expensive tastes. You tried coke recently and you really like it. It makes your job so much easier because you need to be “on” all the time and you haven’t been sleeping well, but you’ve discovered that if you do just exactly the right amount, you can perform at peak. You have it totally figured out.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I say gesundheit as I’m not religious and don’t like to propagate religious sentiment, but I like the idea, too. I’m not German.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Religious idioms are everywhere in language, and it is seriously not a problem. We can talk about a storm of “biblical” proportions, or say hubris is inviting god’s wrath, or whatever, and none of it is condoning any actual religious belief. Plenty of people celebrate Christmas because they like family and togetherness and indulgent consumerism, even if they don’t consider themselves Christian. And like, one of my favorite explitives is Jesus Fucking Christ.

        Just saying gesundheit is, like, fine. But your explaination reminds me of the people who tried to make latinx a thing. Heavy eyeroll

        • Triasha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hispanic non binary people around me have referred to themselves as Latin (la-teen)

          Is that also cringe?

          • blarghly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, that makes sense since it is actually pronounceable, and has been created organically by people who are actually experiencing a problem, instead of 14 year olds on Tumblr

      • hcf@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I say gelassenheit as I’m not superstitious and don’t like to propagate superstitious sentiment. I’m also not German.

      • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Funnily enough, it is not universally agreed on in German to say “Gesundheit”.
        Many don’t do it any more (me included), because it is a comment on an uncontrolled body function and thus pretty intrusive.

        Exception to this may be people who are really close to you.

    • SelfHigh5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I hate this tradition fiercely and I’m glad to have moved to a place where sneezes are generally ignored. As they should be.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not religious and just ignore people that say bless you. It’s entirely disingenuous anyway. No one is aware of what they’re saying, let alone means it. It’s just a thing for them to feel good and nothing to do with the sneezer.

  • LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Having to sell our labor for a fraction of the profit and being outcast if you want to opt out.

    Coupling healthcare to employment.

    Forcing the majority of retirement savings to be tied up in the stock market and killing company sponsored pensions.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not sure I agree with your appreciation of the elevator. I don’t know where you are (I’ve never heard “ope” either) but at least in Australia not everyone faces the door in an elevator. I’ll copy my own comment left below to someone else:

    …you are in an elevator for a very short time, unlike with public transport for example. You might as well be facing the direction you need to go to, so that when the doors open, you go, instead of having to turn and then go.

    Second… I regularly take crowded elevators and while it’s true that almost nobody stands facing back to the door, it’s also true that easily half the people choose to stand sideways, facing the side walls. (Which btw makes someone with a pram or wheelchair easier to get into the elevator). It’s a mix of being ready to go and being able to rest your back against the walls of the elevator more than an unspoken social convention.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      in Australia not everyone faces the door in an elevator.

      In NYC it’s illegal not to. It’s a fun law.

  • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Like how we all face the door in an elevator or feel the need to say ‘ope’ when we almost bump into someone. What’s a silent rule of society that you find hilarious or totally unnecessary?

    I look in the mirror when there is one.

    And when i bump into someone i go “SORRY IM SORRY IM SO SORRY IM SORRY AREYOUOKAY”