For example, if I want to collaborate on making a (non-computer related) textbook with someone, and we want to use git as a version control system. Should we use github/codeberg for this or is there a platform that’s more suitable for using git in nontechnical contexts?

        • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.cadeleted by creatorOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          oh interesting never heard of it. are there any advantages over using LaTeX?

          • Otter@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            LaTeX has been around for a lot longer, and Typst is one of the projects looking to replace it

            Typst is a lot more intuitive and easier to use, but it might be missing some packages and tools that were designed for LaTeX.

            For your purposes, I think it would work just fine

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    There’s a different hub, where people all share their porn. A porn hub if you will.

    It’s called Xhamster.

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    If it helps, a number of courses at my university used open source git based textbooks. For example, you can replicate this Statistics textbook using any static site generator designed for documentation: https://moderndive.com/ (https://github.com/moderndive/ModernDive_book/)

    We use vitepress for our docs: https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/get-started

    Or you can get even simpler by using plain markdown files organized into folders.

    In my opinion, it’s better to start off simple while writing the content since then you can pick a tool based on what type of formatting you end up needing

    • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.cadeleted by creatorOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thanks for the info.

      In my opinion, it’s better to start off simple while writing the content since then you can pick a tool based on what type of formatting you end up needing

      Yeah I guess there should be rudimentary markdown to LaTeX translation programs, right?

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah I guess there should be rudimentary markdown to LaTeX translation programs, right?

        I haven’t tried any, but I would think so yes. You can probably run a script over the files to accomplish the same thing :)

      • Meron35@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        pandoc. Converts markdown to html, latex, pdf, and Word.

        It serves as the backend behind basically every program that support some kind of rendering of markdown, e.g. quarto, ipython notebooks.

        Pandoc - Pandoc User’s Guide - https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Plenty of people use git hosting to host non-code, like documentation, books written in markdown/LaTeX, etc. I personally use git to maintain a few personal wikis.

    Different git forges will have different rules about what content they allow. GitHub definitely allows non-code. I’ve seen Codeberg repos be used for non-code too. Codeberg’s only requirement is that you only host free (as in freedom) content, so I suppose for non-code that means using an appropriate CC licence for example. I can’t imagine any of the popular git hosting sites taking issue with someone hosting their book, unless you’re hosting, like, the whole of Wikipedia or something.

    • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.cadeleted by creatorOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      interesting. how does it do with collaboration? the guy im working with has no tech knowledge really so i dont want to make it too complicated for him

      • thagoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s been quite a few years since I used it, but iirc users log in and have access to the chapters and pages that already exist, so they are able to edit them as they see fit. Likewise they can create new chapters and/or pages that would be accessible to other users. Writing is done on a wysiwyg interface like with word processor apps. I recall it being pretty easy to use, so less tech-savvy users who can write a word doc should not have too many issues.

  • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Google sheets or Microsoft office. I don’t know if a dedicated platform exists but I would not expect a large demand given the alternatives.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Any version control system works for this.

    If you want something fairly user friendly, maybe look at Joplin or Logseq which are both specifically for text.