Yesterday while cooking I set off the smoke detector, no I did not burn anything. They go off when I cook over a high heat. And yesterday once they started going off they would not stop. I ended up having to disconnect them all (they are hard wired with an interconnect) and I replaced them this morning. Aaaaaaaand let me tell you, I had a sleepless night last night knowing there were no detectors installed.

https://www.southernliving.com/how-often-should-you-replace-smoke-detectors-8774122

  • Gork@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is only true for the Americium based smoke detectors. The newer photoelectric cell fire detectors don’t decay like Americium detectors, and as long as you replace the battery it’ll be good for however long it’s internal components (capacitors and whatnot) will last.

    Technology Connections has a good video about this subject:

    https://youtu.be/DuAeaIcAXtg

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 month ago

      The half life for americium 241 is like 450 years. The 10 year replacement has nothing to do with decay. It’s just a non specific safety in case any of the electronics or board etc start to fail. Photoelectric detectors have the same 10 year recommendation as a max.

      It’s actually recommend by many organizations (like the NFPA) to replace photoelectric detectors more often than ionization detectors, if anything.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s tuned to a specific output and isn’t exactly field adjustable. Certainly it will continue to be radioactive long after you’re dead, but that doesn’t mean it will still be working properly.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I know exactly how they work. I’m a firefighter and a hazmat technician. Plus I work on and repair electronics as a hobby. Your smoke detector failing after 10 or 30 years has zero to do with radioactive decay. It’s from contamination (dust) and sensor degradation. Once the metal plates inside get enough buildup from dust (like smoke dust and regular dust) and contamination from humidity, the charge that’s supposed to be detected between those plates from the ionization stays lower all the time. That means less actual “smoke” is needed to drop it below the threshold. This happens MUCH faster than radioactive decay reducing what it will ionize.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is anecdotical but I moved into an apartment with a 30 year old ionizing smoke detector, and the failure was it was too sensitive, I assume because there were less electrons being emitted from the radioactive element, any faint smoke caused it to go off. Eventually it got into a state where it would always be in an alert state, and was beeping 100% of the time, which was when the landlord finally replaced it.

      My assumption with the 10 year replacement recommendation for Americium based smoke detectors is to replace it before it becomes too sensitive and annoying, because they were worried some people would remove the battery and just live without an active smoke detector.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s no radiation drop after just 30 years from americium 241. It has a 450 year half life. After decades electric components start to fail and\or things get dirty. After 30 years of getting smoke in it, there was probably a layer of dust\smoke over where the radiation is at that were blocking some of the radiation all the time, that made it more sensitive.

        Same issues will happen with photoelectric detectors. It’s recommended to replace both types after no longer than 10 years. I have no idea where the person you responded to got the information about them not needing replaced as often as ionization detectors. If anything, it’s actually the opposite.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I was about to link to the same video. From what I remember though both types have strength and weaknesses in regards to the type of fire.

      Edit: watched it again so ionization smoke detectors are better at detecting active fire, although his conclusion is that the benefit is not as big and overall photoelectric ones are better.

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      According to the one i just had to replace, combo carbon monoxide detectors need to be replaced. I don’t know how the carbon monoxide part works, but i wonder if it’s a reagent or something.

  • kinkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    They make ones now with an internal battery that lasts 10 years. No more chirping and swapping 9V batteries.

  • Tomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reminds me of this, couldn’t find the OG image unfortunately.

    Hate it when people overlay unnecessary text, I guess it’s for the simpletons

  • sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    You’re supposed to test them fairly regularly.

    I get that monthly might be a pain, but once or twice a year is probably smart, for safety equipment.

  • carrylex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you’re not living in USA-land you’re probably fine to simply change the battery every few years because you’ve got a photoelectric smoke detector.

    Ionization based smoke detectors (that require changing because radioactive…) are more unsafe and usually only allowed in special cases in non third world countries like the EU.

    Oh and you also can’t just throw them into the trash because you know radioactivity… except in USA-land…

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Photoelectric smoke detectors also need to be replaced every ten years or so, and the radioactivity of ionization alarms is well within safe levels as long as you aren’t taking them apart to eat the 241Am. They’re sensitive to different things but the photoelectric ones are probably better suited to modern home fires (but they’re more prone to false-positives from kitchen smoke).

      Pointless America Bad and radiation fear-mongering.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Aaaaaaaand let me tell you, I had a sleepless night last night knowing there were no detectors installed.

    This seems really weird. Smoke detectors are important, but the odds of a fire any given night are incredibly low. To me, replacing a detector would be a chore I’d get to within a week, and I definitely wouldn’t lose sleep over it.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Admittedly I did similar. At one point I had a non-working detector and noticed it was long expired when I tried to replace the battery. I realized I had been in my house more than ten years and the detectors had been installed by a previous owner, probably in the early 2000’s. Those did NOT beep when they expired

        When I replaced those, the new ones were all configured to beep when expired and they were starting to push the sealed detectors with ten year non-replaceable battery. Sure enough, ten years later they all started beeping that they were expired.

        I guess I assumed that it’s been 20 years and most people will have replaced detectors at least once. In my state, there’s a required inspection that all detectors are up to date before a house can be sold

        (Which is really annoying because mine are all battery but the current standard is they must interconnect so I’ll need some electrical work if I want to sell my house)

  • lohky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ours were just replaced in our rental house. They were last replaced in 2004 and our corpo landlord just doesn’t give a fuck.

    I don’t think our dryer vent has been cleaned in a decade. This place is a fire trap.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You mean those things that make noise when I don’t want them to?

    Yeah, I removed the batteries.

    Dying from smoke inhalation in my sleep sounds like one of the easier ways to go.

  • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you live in a state that observes time changes you should get in the habit of checking them on that day. It means you check them twice a year and you’ll be mindful of the expiration date.

  • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is why I just go ahead and buy the new ones that come with batteries that last 10 years. You’ll have to replace the whole unit when they die anyway.

  • unphazed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    YSK that those old detectors will most likely not have the same plugs as the old ones, either. Prepare to figure out what circuit they’re all on and a rewire with new dongles (pigtails? Not sure of the right name). Ah, what a fun weekend. 15 min turned into a couple of hours.

    • nocturne@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      New ones had the same pigtail as the old one (both were Kiddie brand), but I did have one I had to rewire. As far as I can tell, they do not have a dedicated circuit, so I had to shut down the entire house.

      • Pyr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Depending on the building code / age of house it may or may not be on an individual circuit.

        I think newer homes don’t so there’s one less point of failure that can prevent them for going off in a fire. I could be wrong though.

      • unphazed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mine were Kidde as well. They were installed by my dad maybe 17 years ago when he built the home. I eventually found the breaker after a fun game of yelling “Is the light on?” I laughed when I found out it was on the same breaker as the septic aerator (which I had apparently also attached to a garage circuit overhead for work lights and ceiling outlets for tools due to the wall circuit overloading). Fun fact for the people who may not be familiar with septic aerators - when they lose power they have a box on a separate circuit for the failure alarm (which isn’t very loud but annoying af).

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    And please check them to see if they are safe to throw in the trash before you do. Some of them contain small amounts of really nasty stuff. Even the hazardous waste dropoff on my county was reluctant to take a batch from me. They said “you’re really supposed to send those back to the manufacturer.” But they did eventually take them.