• flango@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    KY P.40, PARA 125 [REDACTED BUT RETRIEVABLE TEXT]

    The ‘TikTank’ [internal TikTok group studying issues affecting TikTok] Report observed that “Tiktok is particularly popular with younger users who are particularly sensitive to reinforcement in the form of social reward and have minimal ability to self-regulate effectively.”

    Well, they are targeting young users because it’s a biological fact that they can’t control themselves very well, meaning that their brains are not fully developed yet. This is like making profits from people with diabetes by selling expensive insulin; if they don’t get it, they die.

    TikTok should answer legally by its actions, as well as other industries.

    • FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is like making profits from people with diabetes by selling expensive insulin; if they don’t get it, they die.

      More like taking advantage of a drunk person, but I agree. Still a shitty thing to do.

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Interesting that as soon as China loses control of it, we get stories about how it’s so bad for you. News flash, it’s always been bad for you. It and all the others like it are one of the major reasons the world is the way it is today.

    • kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      This didn’t change after china lost control of it, there’ve always been a bunch of stories about how it’s bad for you

  • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    8 days ago

    Children are not the only ones being harmed here. This selective focus is only going to destroy the perception of other groups in terms of harm. Teenagers, young people, old people are also being harmed here - it is by design, and its everyone.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      I bet this is related to Palantir facial recognition. Seems like identifying people and feeding it into some database is very important lately.

      • ilovepiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Always has been. You’ve been fingerprinted on the web for 10 years minimum. You know those secret aliases you had? Yeah they always knew they were you.

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Stop. I’m not fucking playing this stupid game. I’m well aware of data brokers and selling our data. This is clearly different uploading pictures of yourself with id as a requirement to access websites.

          If she had wheels she’d be a bike

            • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              That’s how they want to verify underage kids. You need to upload photo proof of your ID. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that agencies like ICE are also taking everyone’s pictures to upload to Palantir database.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 days ago

    Oh look, another company that knows it’s harming people and society, hides it and keeps on chasing profit and power.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah that’s because they have a state sanctioned version of TikTok that is controlled by an algorithm that police’s peoples speech and what they do and reports anything untoward to the proper authorities.

        And now that Fox News has bought TikTok, the US has their own version of an algorithm that will police people’s speech and what they do, and most likely report anything untoward to the proper authorities.

  • Kkk2237pl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not only tiktok. My parents are addicted to facebook stories and YouTube stories ;)

    The same algorithm…

    What is more there a lot of Russian propaganda and misinformation. But in Poland that’s common in social media

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    It’s harmful to everyone not just children, and so is Instagram. This sounds like more mandatory ID propaganda given how the government won’t stop the most obvious of pedophile sex traffickers.

    Edit: It literally is:

    Of course, if TikTok is removed, many children will just move to TikTok’s competitors: Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts. This is why it’s so important for countries to follow Australia’s lead: raise the age for opening social media accounts to 16 and require the companies to enforce it.

    • RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Or parents can do their job. We have to suffer with age verification bullshit laws that’s just there to have us all in a database.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Not having it be regulated makes it a lot harder for parents to do their job, because the kids with responsible parents are getting peer-pressured by the kids with irresponsible parents.

        Or put another way: you’re not making parents do their jobs; you’re making their jobs impossible by forcing them to choose between ruining their kid’s mental health by letting her be exposed to social media, or ruin her mental health by forcing her to be ostracised for not using social media.

        The only way to have a successful outcome is to force everyone else’s kids not to use it, not just your own, and no amount of rugged individualist good parenting can accomplish that by itself!

        That said, I am extremely sympathetic to the arguments against age verification laws too, which is why my preferred solution would be to fucking outlaw and destroy corporate social media entirely, for kids and adults alike!

        • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          You are exactly right. We’re all in this ugly, trapped situation, together, like it or not.

          As a parent, do you remove the obviously ruinous toxins from the kiddo’s environment, entirely? Seems like the only sensible choice.

          But then again…for the kid, few things could feel worse. An entire childhood spent alienated from their peers? Permanently out of the loop, to where that becomes the personality trait noticed and remembered by others?

          What a horrible bargain, I completely hate it.

          “Well, a little hideous poison for you, routinely, I guess, dear. I wouldn’t want you to end up weird, after all…”

        • Retail4068@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          Or like, use the ample parental controls to limit their time to a reasonable amount 🤷‍♂️.

            • Retail4068@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Oh god, they’ll get some access? Like, I can’t completely control my children and they are individuals who have the right to start making choices? Jesus Christ, I’m not going to be able to exert my will over them indefinitely?

              If your child is old enough to leave the house and sneak around on you they were going to do that. You should be teaching them to live in society, not just avoiding it and dumping them into an environment without the skills to process the reality of life.

          • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yeah man, you’re on top of it.

            It’s just lazy parents, right? Like they’re not even trying, huh?

            Couldn’t really have anything to do with - I dunno, NO parents except the born-rich, being able to parent properly, on account of having to make the dollars keep adding up.

            Probably also NOT the wildly, disgustingly sophisticated Big Fucking Tech doing everything they can to pull our children into their hilariously successful maze of dissatisfaction.

            If only the parents would just use the obviously available parental controls! Duh.

            Fuck you, in every way, for real.

            • Retail4068@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              Nobody can parent 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

              Clearly you’ve never been to a PTO/A meeting or town hall on education, or entire motorcades of parents spending days traveling with their kids for sports 🤣

              Why do so many CLEARLY non parents react so strongly to a topic they have little to no experience in 🤣

              Nobody has time 🤣, thank you so much for this chuckle.

              • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                Quite the charmed life you apparently lead. If you manage to peer outside your own economic bubble someday you’ll see what I mean. Doesn’t sound like you’ll be doing that though.

      • lemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Most parents won’t. People are people. Those that would want to have to ballance the risk of excluding their children from the collective.

      • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Durable societies are unfortunately bound to have such inconveniences for some in exchange for the betterment of many.

        Tech companies have released the equivalent of digital opium so they and the government are accountable.

        When we look back at the opioid epidemic of the 90s we don’t blame the addicts or their families (well I suppose we did at one point, without the benefit of hindsight or a bigger picture view), we blame the Sacklers, pharmaceutical companies, doctors that took kickbacks etc.

        I’d hate for us to make the same mistake just because the drug is delivered in a way we don’t completely understand yet.

        It’s also not as simple as asking parents to simply be better at parenting, whatever that may mean. The drug is already out on the street, widely available, and ridiculously addictive. Keeping your child from it is not only depriving them of a dopamine hit that their brains are not developed enough to simply ignore (even most adults are addicted) and it is in many cases relegating them to social ostracization.

        This is far beyond what one parent or group of parents can fix. It requires a societal level change which generally needs to come from the government, whether we like it or not.

        I’d be happy to hear out possible solutions and, as a parent, share what is viable and what isn’t. It would be nice to hear from other parents also.

        • dustycups@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          It isn’t (just) a technical problem for parents. Having the underage social media ban means that there isn’t the peer pressure for kids to use - well there is, but its much lower

                • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  You’re confused by the assertion that access to social media is at least as bad for children as some banned drugs? Is this your first day on earth?

              • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                That’s the point, it doesn’t. Much like the argument about targeting marginalized people when you’re talking about children.

                Edit: Yes, there are plenty of children and teens without access to information and the support structures they should have IRL. I was one of them and it’s fucking awful. The internet can help with that by offering exposure to different ideologies, evidence that you aren’t alone in what you’re feeling or going through.

                But I don’t look back on everything I did and encountered online in mid 00s - early 10s era internet and go “that was overwhelmingly a great thing that I should have had the sort of unrestricted access to that I did”. And the internet has been even more corporatized and “skinner-boxed” since.

                And with the benefit of hindsight, I can see a bunch of other ways that I could have gotten the good I got from the internet without all the bad, and through things in real life that I had dismissed in my youth.

                • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  we owe today’s teens a better internet experience. we should focus on building something that would have been ideal for us to have had when we were their age

          • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Some important context on this user before anyone else gets dragged into a discussion: check their post history, multiple to a “Youth Liberation” community.

            No shade meant by calling it out, but I think that makes it much more clear how strong your opinions are on this. There’s nothing to be gained in trying to talk to you about this when your opinions are set so strongly. You aren’t going to see the dangers that the rest of us see because your focus is on allowing freedom from oppresive parental figures.

            Edit: they also “won’t give an inch on this

              • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                You can’t seriously be saying that in the comments of a post linking to leaked internal documents showing that one of these companies is aware of the dangers they pose and damage they are doing. Did nazis falsify internal documents and this leak?

                Did you somehow miss the Cambridge Analytica scandal with Facebook, where they manipulated the emotional content of users’ feeds and gathered scientifically significant measurable responses in the emotions of the manipulated users?

                Have you missed where each of these companies has had many public job postings for positions requiring applicants have psychology degrees?


                People like to think of 4chan as the website that drove people to suicide, but every single one of the major social media sites has a fucking body count at this point, and almost every one is in the double digits.


                Beyond all that, lemmy’s userbase trends older. I saw the tail end of the satanic panic into the moral grandstanding about the dangers of violent video games. I’d wager most of the users here lived through it.

                I know firsthand what a moral panic looks like. They didn’t have the amount of research papers (that hold up to peer review) and leaked internal documents we can point at. They didn’t have body counts even remotely similar.


                Keep on fighting for opressed teens to have more ways to get away from opressive parents. To have access to factual information that their parents don’t want them to have. It’s a good cause with not many people fighting for it.

                That doesn’t mean though that anything you think challenges or opposes it is a nazi plot.


                Teens are resilient and have astounding amounts of time on their hands. They’ll find a way to communicate, ways to make their own underground social platforms if they need to. The cat’s out of the bag. It’s the fucking internet. Corpos, government boots, no one can truly stop the signal. They couldn’t back in the days of dial up BBS. Good fucking luck now that you can get a device orders of magnitude more powerful for $50.


                Don’t bother replying for my sake. I’m blocking you so I don’t get increasingly shitty towards you. Your mind’s made up on this, and so is mine. No point going back and forth if we’re just going to get more frustrated and exasperated at each other. Best of luck in your endeavours.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        One lawmaker proposed a law that would make it illegal to allow your children to see “drag” so none of this has to deal with parents doing their jobs and everything to deal with giving Nazis control over what other people are allowed to see

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Or parents can do their job.

        They don’t, which is why regulation is essential. Not unlike how recycling failed because we expected individuals to behave responsibly instead of regulating manufacturers.

        And you’re already in the database.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          They are not. It’s not the governments job to parent the nations children, (and conveniently erode our privacy in the process)

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            How is this argument different from “it’s not the governments job to provide healthcare / education / social services”

            • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              8 days ago

              Providing healthcare and social services is not inherently about controlling how people think and what information they have access to.

              • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                The thing that none of these moral panic people want you to talk about is who is deciding what is and isn’t acceptable for everyone’s children. They’ve already admitted the intent to use this to censor everything LGBT so that’s not a slippery slope that’s just factual reality

                • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  “Why the education system is horrible and needs to be dismantled and entirely reconsidered” is slightly off topic, but yeah you got me I do not think the argument is all that different wrt education. It is very different from those other things though.

          • dustycups@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            When I was a kid I wouldn’t dream of wearing a stackhat riding my bike. Then the laws came in, everyone did and it was fine. Same as seatbelts.
            This is even more so because of the network effects.
            Don’t get me wrong - the Australian laws are a very blunt instrument & I hate the idea of having to identify myself to the government. Fortunately it hasn’t happened to me - yet.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Can’t say the law for kids to wear helmets on bikes has done much to get them to do so. Though I don’t think bike helmet laws did much to rob the population of their privacy either.

        • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t think they approach necessity tbh. At best, they’re a bandaid, and a crutch for parents.

          But the drawbacks of the laws that have been implemented so far, and are trying to be, as vast overreaches that give a false sense of security with no real benefit. They also do that by placing even more information into the hands of the very companies causing the problem in the first place.

          That’s where regulations would focus in an ideal world, limiting the companies from causing the problems in the first place, not slapping bad patches over them.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Already happening in some places, like Australia. Though I’m not sure if they’ll actually be able to enforce it.

  • utopiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    Damn… money laundering though LIVE with its “gifts” I never thought about this. Everything else is wrong, at scale, but this surprised me.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      If you watch a decent amount of twitch streaming it’s pretty obvious. I’m sure there are a ton of whales out there willing to dump >$1000 in one go on a streamer, but just watch something like a “subathon”, or a “hype train”. You’ll see more dollars than viewers they have move around in the span of like 30 minutes.

      Or when streamers “bet” each other large amounts of gift subscriptions. That’s explicitly money, and abstracting it behind subs only masks how damn much a lot of these “bets” are really for.

      I’m not going to claim that anywhere near all of it is straight laundering, but it’s pretty damn obvious just how fucking easy it would be to use it all for washing/tumbling of dirty funds.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    If I ever have children, TikTok will be one of the first things I’ll have blocked for them.

    • Badargel@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      If your parents do that for you, you’d find a way around it. As someone with no kids, it’s something I’ve thought about, but I feel like there has to be another solution.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, the old “strict parents make sneaky kids” thing is unfortunately very true. You won’t stop the kids from doing it. You’ll just lose the ability to monitor them when they inevitably do it behind your back anyways.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        If your parents do that for you, you’d find a way around it.

        Them finding a way around it , hopefully technically, at least makes them grow their problem solving, motivation and rebellion skills

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah, maybe you’re right. Seems like a better idea would be to just talk to the kids and get them convinced that it’s trash and/or find them something more productive to do.

  • nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Is TikTok really harming children, or is this just our generation’s “television/internet/video games are bad for children”?