• tourist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Depending on how serious you are:

      Choose weed instead

      Or the crisis line. You probably already know where to find it. Help is available. You do not have to suffer alone. I love you homie.

      • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Just kidding, unless given that exact choice lol. Weed has been a great help this year. Love you too fam, appreciate the thoughtful comment.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Or the crisis line.

        What happens is that they “triage” you, where depending on how you answer their script you get cops at your door and a trip to hell on earth, or you are on hold for 20 minutes to speak with someone who also is reading a script and doesn’t give a rats ass about you.

        Maybe states that aren’t Oklahoma have mental hospitals which are preferable to drinking yourself to sleep, but who knows.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Everyone and everything will end in my lifetime. I’ll be here to see it all crumble just before I am incinerated in the blast.”

      is another popular escapist fantasy.

      No one wants to believe they’ll just have to hobble through a slow and painful decline.

  • Sigilos@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean scientifically speaking, we are all made of stardust. Everything in the universe is. Including the existential crisis your trying to forget by disassociating.

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I choose neither, and instead day dream about fully automated luxury gay space communism, knowing I’m gonna die before such a thing could ever come to fruition.

  • DoubleDongle@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I just want to drop in and call out “death is a design flaw” specifically. It is not. Without death, there can be no evolution, and any change to the environment is extinction.

    The mountains seem eternal, but there were forests before many of them, and though the trees will be different in the distant eons when the mountains are worn to nothing, the forests will live on.

    • MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s pretty cool in nature, especially with plants and fungi that don’t think. But applying it to people is kinda eugenics-y. “Billions should die so that our genes can improve”

      • DoubleDongle@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh, giving ourselves endless lifespans is a fine endeavor. We’ve got plenty of ways to adapt to changing environments without changing our bodies, and we’re pretty close to being able to do that without dying and evolving anyway. Shit might get weird, but it always does with us.

        • MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Based. I always think stories about “immortality is bad actually” are weird because people are fundamentally capable of change. Lots of people choose not to change, but I think that’s because the boredom in their life is smaller than other forces like poverty, oppression, trauma, and culture. Give people infinite time to heal from their traumas and I think they eventually will. I think enlightenment is a more stable state than ignorance.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hmm, why can’t there be evolution without death? As long as organisms reproduce, genes are passed on, and some reproduce more successfully than others, why would it matter if existing individuals stay around or not? I don’t see how it makes evolution fundamentally impossible.

      • potoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        So we could go visit our great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents and they’d look like Jabba the Hutt. Holidays would be a beast.

      • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        death is what paves the way for change. Old ideas literally die out, since the dawn of time. The passing of strategy and technique happens in even single celled organisms

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That is indeed what happens, and it is helpful. But I disagree evolution wouldn’t happen without it.

          • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            the laws of thermodynamics though, you eventually die. You eventually spend resources, you eventually have to obtain more, etc. Unless you are perfect, you may be killed unless you know your environment perfectly, no?

            • dev_null@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yeah, but that’s an argument against being able to live forever, not an argument against evolution being able to happen, if you did.

    • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s funny, just yesterday I looked at RAM prices randomly for the first time in months, thought “wow, that’s high”, and today I see reference after reference after reference about how high it is.

  • oni ᓚᘏᗢ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Really? Are people out there that thinks that death is a design flaw? I know it’s shitpost, but it’s based on something after all

    • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, there are people who believe we will find a way to transcend death via technology. I personally think a world ruled by immortal omniwealthy methusalas that will never let even death release their boot from the necks of the common man is a bad thing, but…

      • oni ᓚᘏᗢ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Once I read a creepypasta where the wealthy spent a lot of money paying research and development of immortality, only achieving a worse version of cancer. The wealthy obviously went dead.

        • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s the good ending. Bad ending is it works and the dictators of the world crush everyone else, tantalizing just enough people with the immortality carrot to make the system eternal.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I believe this is an idea most legitimately championed by Nick Bostrom. Here is a video explaining his perspective.

      I feel like, at least from the stance of abstract philosophy, he makes some good points. And I’m not enough of a philosopher to refute them (though I’m sure some have). Personally, my stance is “I’ll cross that bridge when I arrive at it” - I expect to die before that happens.

    • binarytobis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m also hung up on “Crypto is UBI”. Surely this is a one off crackpot quote and not a thing, right?

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        This one is empirically falsified. I never heard it before, and even though I can believe somebody is saying it somewhere, it’s an incredibly stupid thing to say.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh almost forgot

          More than three years ago we founded Worldcoin with the ambition of creating a new identity and financial network owned by everyone; the rollout begins today. If successful, we believe Worldcoin could drastically increase economic opportunity, scale a reliable solution for distinguishing humans from AI online while preserving privacy, enable global democratic processes, and eventually show a potential path to AI-funded UBI.

          https://world.org/cofounder-letter

          It’s the iris scan one

          Worldcoin orbs

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I honestly think most of these bugfuck crazy views stem from we humans not having evolved to deal with the modern world. People feed us the simple answers we crave.

    • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      We were meant to subsist off of grubs, berries, and whatever your extended family could hunt as we trekked around, dying randomly of infections and bear attacks. Then some fucking asshole started farming and it’s all been downhill since!

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t know how to put this to you guys but the one on the right is significantly more plausible than the one on the left.

    Also I don’t like turmeric.

  • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    im not even joking i will sooner become a shaman that lives in the middle of the woods than a techbro im so done with tech i swear

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    We scoff at them both, but seriously pick one and get comfortable, looking reality right in the butt-cheeks is bad for the soul.

    • potoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Stop looking at the cheeks, grit those teeth, and give that anus a good gander.

      (Full disclosure: I am not a therapist, but it’s good advice.)

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Legitimately why I picked up tarot reading though. I needed an introspective mindfulness activity. I used to do cognitive behavioral therapy with spreadsheets. It was informative but exhausting. I think it gave me a good set of foundational concepts, but realistically humans are just fundamentally meant to surround themselves with pretty rocks while talking about how much they personally relate to shared culturally inherited stories. And I just love explaining Gnosticism to people in the most chaotic way possible.