Reminds me of the Crowdstrike incident last year.

    • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Reminds me of the Cloudflare incident this year.

      And the Cloudflare incident also this year.

      Were those as big as this one? Somehow I missed them.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh man, these global outages are really getting out of hand. A few days after the recent AWS and Azure outages, I suddenly noticed that I couldn’t reach certain webpages anymore. And I genuinely didn’t even bother trying to debug, because I just assumed that it’s another global outage.

    In the evening, I did look into it and noticed that my router was at fault (presumably DNS got bugged by a recent update). That was just wild to me, that I genuinely deemed it more likely that several major webpages went offline together than that my home setup is fucky.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean, sure, I do understand what’s happening on a logical level. I’m just so baffled, because this whole internet thingamabob was architected by the military.
        It was intentionally built, so that parts of it could fail without disrupting the rest. When a corporation fucks up, it was supposed to take down the servers of that corporation, not also a good chunk of the rest.

        But unfortunately, this internet thingamabob is merely the closest approximation we have for the “perfect market” that economics theory calls for, so it still doesn’t actually self-regulate like that whole theory would love to believe.
        In fact, it is so much worse, because now monopolization happens across the whole planet. Particularly also because we don’t have a functioning “world government” that could enforce competition at that level via laws.

        So, the network leads to companies monopolizing on top of it and then monopolies necessitate that the respective companies do as poor of a job as possible, because this reduces costs and increases profits. As a result, major parts of this military-grade internet now falter every few weeks.

        • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yep. The resilient system got corrupted by capitalism, which is an inherently monopolizing centralizing destabilizing enshittifying exploitation algorithm.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 days ago

    The world’s richest man can’t even keep his own website up and accessible. But the guys hosting the fedi in their garage are just fine. Lol

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    It reminds me more of the AWS outage last month.

    It’s probably not half of the Internet, but the fact that it’s so many very visible sites should be a warning sign to everyone that the Internet is nowadays too reliant on a few points of failure (which can cause other problems, e.g. censorship).

    • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      From a security perspective when you consider this, along with our reliance on mobile phones, POS systems, digital payment processors, iot devices, cell phone providers, etc etc.

      Sooner or later someone with ill intent is going to savagely fist fuck the whole fucking ecosystem to death and take a shit on the flaming wreckage.

      Law enforcement neither understands nor gives a fuck about tech for the most part, unless you’re dealing with high end espionage type shit. Good luck getting officers dunning and Krueger to take action on anything suspicious when they think their ability to use an iPhone means they’re the greatest thing to happen to tech since the microprocessor.

      The makers of consumer tech products could give a fuck about security. Wireless providers similarly could not give a squirt of fucking piss about security as long as you’re paying your monthly bills and they can harvest data. Politicians only care insofar as they’re able to use tech to push their moral bullshit, control and police peoples’ actions. It goes on and on and on and on.

      We are reliant on all manner of tech products, both hardware and software, to participate in modern life, and yet the political apparatus treats it all like it’s disposable, as if it’s 1996 and it doesn’t matter if all of this goes to shit.

      We are a naked, drunk 16 year old girl at a frat house with a sign that says “fuck me, I’m wasted” around our necks and we’re pretending like there are no consequences to this, or worse yet that nothing bad will happen.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Cloudflare is in an interesting space. They are a service provider (ddos protection, scalable edge caching, SSL termination, etc) that allows the highly centralized internet to function. However they aren’t a gatekeeper at all. You only need cloudflare if you are in the top 5% of internet websites by volume. So when cloudflare has a problem, Lemmy isn’t affected, but Reddit is. My blog isn’t affected, but someone like https://blog.ipspace.net/ is affected.

      My personal browsing habbits meant I didn’t even realize there was a cloudflare problem until I read an article about it on Lemmy. Anyway, just a tangent, but as a network engineer I’m sure i’ll be interested in the RCA.

  • antrosapien@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s some malicious satisfaction watching centralized internet burning in dumpster fire while your self hosted stuff is still up

    • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Except many of us use cloudflare tunnels to reach our selfhosted kit from the internet because we’re behind CGNATs…

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Isn’t cloudflare a pretty common part of remotely accessing your server? I don’t use it but I’ve seen lots of people talk about it and recommend using them.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        yes. it also prevents attacks. it’s basically a necessity these days.

        if you host your own stuff and get any traffic you’ll get DDoSed by bots. cloudflare prevents this by detaching your DNS from your IP and distributing requests.

        just port forwarding on your home network these days… and you’ll get dozens of attacks per hour.

        the internet is not ‘nice’ anymore. services like cloudflare are a necessity for any active services beyond personal use. long gone are the days you could host a web server from your bedroom.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Maybe you guys are hosting more than me but I’ve got a few ports forwarded and don’t see any unusual activity. I guess I’m just lucky.

          • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            For me what triggered getting a lot of malicious login attempts in the logs was pointing a dns record directly at my ip

            • krashmo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Ah, yeah I don’t do that. Haven’t had much of a reason to so far. Only have a few minor convenience type services opened up

      • antrosapien@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I haven’t exposed anything to internet and self hosted headscale instance. I’m not behind CGNAT so it was quite easy.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    In short: yes, because Cloudflare is the man in the middle between you and half the internet, most pages use it’s service.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    i’m usually on frontends, alternatives and self-hosted services. i’m barely seeing any of those outages.

    feeling cool rn ngl 😎

      • I’m not sure this is what I’m looking for, I appreciate it though!

        I’m hoping for something where the only thing I need to have on someone elses system is DNS entries, ideally.

        I know I can use duckdns to automatically update my dns entries when my public IP expires (residential conn), and I know how to handle setting up DNS entries themselves(I hate dns 😓) but I’m just not sure how to configure nginx or apache. As it stands the only “get this thing on the web” tool I’m actually proficient with is streamlit, which I can’t use with my selfhosted tools.

  • VoxAliorum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s so funny :P just months ago one of my most used forums adopted cloudflare and many asked “Are you sure?”. Well…

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Weird. Didn’t notice because Cloudflare blocks my real user traffic because I have the audacity to use a VPN and Firefox with privacy extensions that block like maybe two of their arsenal of fingerprinting tools.