Nice answer and i do really appreciate your answer thanks for your hard work to write it it.

“Human nature” is just a short way of referring to the complex subject of certain behaviors present in some individuals and how they interact with human group dynamics, similarly to how “Theory of Evolution” is a short way of referring to the complex subject of how genetic traits that provide small advantages with reproductive success consequences can through time and the law of large number spread to alter an entire population or even create new species. In fact both those things are correlated.

Evolution has scientific articles behind it. Do you have scientific articles behind your “human nature” claims. Its science’s job to analyse “nature”. If such phenomena existed there would be articles about it. Please send it.

Interesting take. But there is some truth to the notion of ‘human nature’. Humans do act certain ways; we retract from pain, we attempt to solve problems and communicate.

Yes but these are psychological behaviours of humans. Psychology as it is name suggest psycho-logia is a scientific branch. One must speak about that “human nature” if they have scientific data. And instantly that would not be human nature at all because scientific researches have titles like “the change of bird population in cyprus in tha last 50 years” and not “bird nature”\

Whether it is ‘human nature’ that dictatorship power corrupts people can only be inferred by the examples we have seen. If you can show that a dictatorship didn’t lead to abuse of power in some significant number of cases, then it would be proven false.\

It is a generalization not a fact. You cant build up your argument on a generalization and say that it is “human nature”. As if humans have evolved by a scientifically approved fact that to do that. While i agree on power corrupts i have awareness of that "if we give one person all the power the probability of it will ruin them is very high. Very bold of someone to label something as “natural”.

I am okay with going “statics show that humans are tend to do xyz” I am not okay just saying “human nature”

ah yes the good old caste system that makes you post normieslop on your karma farm subreddits.

are them still down?

go back to school

oh btw i am an anarchist. Anarchy also is not well with “human nature”. So dont think I am a Marxist-leninist and defending them. I just…

…hate that word.

human nature does not exist. explained it here:

https://blorp.blahaj.zone/inbox/c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world/posts/https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpost%2F38937776/comments/17913885

Your opinion does not matter, I am not saying this because you are invalid. I am saying this because this is not the thing i wanna talk with you.

“human nature” these two words mean nothing and even more than being meaningless these two words are harmful. What human nature? Are there any scientific proofs that something is “human nature”. It has no logic behind yet it is accepted by you and excepted to accept by the reader.

There is no such thing as human nature. Human nature is when you have two hands. Human nature is not when “if someone gains power the power corrupts the powerholder.” there is a chance that it may not occour. It is not certain. the situation of that “human nature” is not very specified. thats why it has no meaning behind it.

The second i wanna point is that the “human nature” is always used against communism. Communism is not well with human nature. okay, sure. What about capitalism. you are either capitalist or communist. You want either private property exist or not. capitalism harms people so it is not very well with human nature either. Power also corrupts in capitalism. Elon Musk is the dictionary defination of power corrupts.

If power corrupts then under capitalism it also is power corrupts if human nature is not well with communism same goes with capitalism.

It is not just you that say this human nature. It is nothing personal. I really do hate that fallacy.

Ahh… please tell me more about this human nature which is incompatible with communism while microplastics flows in your veins.

deleted by creator

yea right

most of these are jihadist nevertheless if they are wahabi-aligned or not. There is a new strong movement among yough turkish people called “secular nationalists”. they ate mostly racist, kemalist and self identified seculars, anti arabisc people. Because to them arab = islam.

Any uyghur is more muslim and jihadist than any turkish jihadist but they like to says uygurs are important palestinians are not.

As an atheist since 2017 pro-kurdistan socialist turk this is a propaganda I am NOT falling for.

Hello I am from turkey and there is a constant uygur propaganda here. Uygurs are turks so turkish nationalists always say that “palestine is not that important, our turkish brothers are being genocided. You traitors are always side with arabs and never with turks”

Actually most of the uyghurs are jihadist and some of them have joined isis at syria. At the past jihadist uyghurs were driving their cars onto chinese people to kill them. I had twitter evidence videos about it but i closed my accounts.

Some of the things about the Uyghur genocide are lie btw. Like “china has gulags for uyghurs”. China has education camps for people indeed but it is being solely for uyghurs is a blantant lie told by the media.

Any crime that is against humanity is unacceptable. I am telling this to mean “not everything you see objectively, without its propganada value is true” and not to mean "uygur genocide is good i am a nazi asshole turkophobic/uyghurphobic ".

hell yea

Lemmy works so let the world just burn down. oh also chatgpt does not work hurraayyy

deleted by creator

Talking with each other at the peoples local council not going to a ballot box to elect some stupid bastad to make decisions for them. I DO NOT CONSENT someone to have my all will. An example can enlight this. I vote for the opposite party as an lgbt+ individual but they are not mentioning my daily life problems instead they are making populism with the religion i do not believe.

You may say it is also a democracy by its defination and you are not wrong but the classical democracy is tyrant of the mass. I want the mass to be knitted for the minority. Just because we are the less should not mean that our opinions matter less. But under the classical democracy it is. Under the classical democracy homophobes are the majority and lgbt+ people are the minority.

It is the actually opposite of that. Socioeconomic factors are the main force of politics. Politics are not limited with the vote box. rather i,t affects all of the people who are the part of society. Within communism there would be no need for democracy. Indirect democracy also creates a ruling class. I would prefer individuals collective decision more than a bureaucrat’s decision that i voted.