Meta along with Ray-Ban announced new smart glasses and the YT reviewers are praising it.

For me, I don’t find them particularly good and being a Meta product, it will be horrible for privacy. Also people can record others without their knowledge with these, hell no!

  • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    It’ll be a hard no for any smart glasses from Meta or Google.

    However, in the very distant and not quite guaranteed future, I would consider smart glasses (again, NOT by Meta/Google/etc) for accessibility.

    As someone with auditory processing disorder, it would be a game changer if I had the ability to read live closed captions of what someone is saying, while they are talking to me. That would be my only use case.

  • Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 days ago

    In concept, they’re the kind of sci-fi shit I dreamed of as a kid. The reality is that they’ll be locked-down useless trash that you pay out the ass to spy on you.

  • ambardeshielo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Just in a dream scenario where they are

    • Seamless, Not bulky
    • GrapheneOS version for it
    • Physical kill switch for mic, camera and sensors
    • Tor routed, or VPN friendly
    • Only open source software
    • Environmental and Fair wages commitment
    • 100% Repairable and pro-consumer ownership
    • Up to date law for these technologies

    I feel like a phoneless future is quite interesting, even though we will face new issues like not knowing if a person is paying attention to you or not.

  • Owl@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 days ago

    When some foss alternative releases at an affordable price, yes.

    See y’all in 2077

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      Just try this epidermal implant. You’ll love it. But, you’ll need the brain implant to activate it…

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 days ago

    If they weren’t a dystopian, privacy invading nightmare and had more actual useful features rather than awful AI, and weren’t owned and controlled by an evil corporation, then I might be inclined to try them.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 days ago

    I’m mildly interested in the technology, but I sure as hell wouldn’t go anywhere near Meta-branded anything. For starters, based on the demo, the product fucking sucks, but then there’s also the privacy and fascism issues.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Not from Meta for sure.

    And for all the people hating on these there are real world applications that could truly help folks. I’m very ADHD. My brain goes on tangents. I forget mid sentence what I was going to say. I have a terrible time remembering peoples names. These are all things this type of technology could help me with. But they would have to be implemented with the correct privacy guards in place. And I wouldn’t touch anything from Zuck with a 39 ½ foot pole.

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      These are valid reasons that I’d consider getting one for myself. But big tech says fuck accessibility, let’s cram it full of bullshit instead. And that’s on top of the privacy concerns that they seem focused on shoving under the rug rather than making it obvious if someone’s using these.