• kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Lmao, crypto tech bros coming out of the woodwork trying to get popularity for their bag holder’s game…

    Also pretending that shit hasn’t been bought up by wall street

    • O_i@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      What? They have like 5%. You should revisit your stance

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Benefits of centralization: Someone can counteract harmful interactions.

    Drawbacks of centralization: Someone can decide legitimate interactions are harmful.

    It does suck when the “harmful interaction management system” goes haywire. But I’m not sure it sucks enough that I’d rather simply not have one.

      • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I trust completely in the central bank to fight fascism. It is necessary. The central bank fights for the laborer, not the capitalist. The central bank fights for freedom, not authoritarianism. The central bank ensures democracy, not an oligarchy. Without a central bank, our entire society would be doomed to fall to fascism. A centralized currency is a major facet between a free society and one with a corrupt dictator surrounded by crooked cronies where the wealthy have all the power and the common man is reduced to crumbs.

        The central bank is divine and good.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah it’s a personal level of comfort sort of thing. Some people value one side of the equation while some people value the other side. Strong case for vendors accepting both cards and crypto instead of just one.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Could’ve would’ve should’ve

      So many things could be so much better.

      Poverty could end tomorrow if we wanted to.

      War could end tomorrow if we wanted to

      Healthcare could be free if we wanted to

      Same for schools and education in general

      “If we wanted to”

      Let me rephrase that: if either the top 1% would let us, or if the 99% would just stand up and take what’s theirs, we could…

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Isn’t this a right wing meme about centrists, but with the text changed?

    The Bitcoin side wouldn’t catch you, because that interferes with the user’s choice to hit the ground.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Perhaps the original is right-wing, though this happens a lot (e.g. the “change my mind” guy). This meme seems anti-collective shout, so I’d place it left wing.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    The insane thing about Bitcoin’s continued popularity is that out of all the thousands of cryptocurrencies out there, it’s easily the worst in every regard.

    I’m not going to name names for fear of being called a shill, but if you want a cryptocurrency for just buying stuff there’s a ton that are more stable, faster, don’t cost a fortune to process, and don’t destroy the planet.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s because the vast majority of people “into crypto” have no interest in the actual underlying asset. They’re just hoping to get rich. I honestly think it destroys any potential crypto had. It’s a shame because it would be good to have an alternative to credit cards for digital transactions, and especially to have a push payment method, as opposed to the pull method used by banks and credit cards

  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    I honestly never understood how Lemmy, a privacy and decentralisation focused community, is so vehemently anti-crypto. It’s worse than genAI. Every time it is mentioned, everyone goes “crypto is a scam”. I don’t think I’ve ever seen any good faith discussion around it, just “scam”, “pyramid scheme”, and “only criminals use it”.

    Let’s get something out of the way immediately: shitcoins are a literal pyramid scheme and a scam. Anyone can make their own cryptocurrency in an evening, and anyone who throws money at them is either a fool or a gambler.

    But I really don’t understand what people mean when they say Bitcoin, or Ethereum, or Monero are a scam. Sure they can be used to scam you, just like Amazon gift cards can. Maybe it’s about the price volatility, but the price of all 3 mentioned before is up on a day, week, month, 6 months, year, and 5 year scale. It’s volatile, but is not a scam. If you bought and sold at two random points in time, it’s more likely you made a profit than “got scammed”. You know what actually is a scam? Credit scores, overdraft fees, having to pay to check your balance, and so many other fucked up practices in the US banking system.

    “Criminals use them” is just the worst fucking argument, especially in a space like this. Are PGP, VPNs and TOR for criminals too? Do you think getting rid of crypto would stop crime?

    And yes, proof of work fucking sucks. The energy consumption of Bitcoin mining is a problem. I am not a cryptobro who spends all his time making trades and is here to tell you that crypto is the salvation. They are far from being “good” for everyday use. I just wanted to point out how it seems that critical thought gets shut down at the sight of those 6 letters, and I hope someone can explain to me what they find so terrible about crypto (aside from environmental concerns and shitcoins)

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Have you noticed that people who work in tech tend to be less excited about cool new flashy tech developments than the average person?

      It’s similar to how people who have worked in fast food aren’t quite as keen on eating out than the average person.

      Same as watching your co-worker who hasn’t washed his hands after his last shit collect the pieces of a burger that dropped on the dirty floor to sell them to a customer isn’t exactly appetizing, knowing what goes on behind the scenes with tech developments doesn’t really get you on board for that either.

    • I think the Lemmy userbase is too small and its easy for a few vocal voices to dominate the conversation.

      There are often contradicting points that the Lemmy hivemind holds.

      Like Lemmy wants to abolish the police but also wants to empower the police to take away people’s guns??? (Talking about the US btw)

      Lemmy loves their doublethink

    • nao@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Bitcoin is a pyramid scheme because it only keeps its value as long as people are constantly buying it. If no one wants to buy it, the value of any amount of bitcoin is zero. This is why people who have bitcoin are trying to convince anyone else to keep buying.

      Your local government-backed currency does not have this problem, because you get paid with it, you pay taxes with it and vendors in your country have to accept it.

    • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I was excited for Bitcoin but the more I learned and the more the public used it, the more I hated it.

      EDIT: FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH IS A BADLY PHRASE EXPLANATION, PLEASE READ MY COMMENT BELOW TO UNDERSTAND MY POINT

      Bitcoins timestamp only supports dates up to 2106 because they decided on an UNSIGNED value. You don’t need negative values… You know when the network starts, that is 0. Without network, no Bitcoin.

      That is how bad it is engineered.

      And we are not even talking proof of work or whatever. Crypto is a scam because the creators made it very obvious that they didn’t really care about the project and the community is just gambling.

  • InfiniteHench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes let’s definitely side with the scam that’s been around for two decades and its only practical use is to rug pull chumps yes this is good advice

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Bitcoin is a lot of things, it’s not a scam. Some cryptocoins aren’t scams either or didn’t start as one.

      A lot of crypto coins are scams

      Bitcoin and any blockchain based payment system is not a viable alternative to payment processors at world scale. Unless power requirements per transaction go down literally exponentially, it will never be.

      Having said all that: Bitcoin does work on the current limited scale, it works better and easier and faster han all payment processors, and most importantly: Bitcoin isn’t a giant dick wanting to insert itself into every orifice of your body

      Fuck Visa, fuck MasterCard, fuck American Express, fuck all of them you fucking psychopathic narcissistic assholes

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Bitcoin may not be a scam per se, but its main usage is to facilitate scams. The biggest of which is being a market that speculators can manipulate to make the currency they actually want.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s not a scam requires a huge Wikipedia <citation needed>

          I’m not saying it’s great, it’s shit, but at least it’s not as evil as visa or MasterCard

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Honestly, what’s the point of a credit card? Why don’t people mostly use debit cards? It gets just directly wire transferred from your account. No sort of junk fees or monthly subscription needed. Genuine Question.

    • JandroDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 months ago

      If someone steals your debit card, they can directly take money out of your account. With credit cards, there’s a buffer between the product and the bank account, and it makes it easier to stop fraud

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve had my debit card information stolen before. My bank knew before I did, cancelled the fraudulent charges, and refunded my money without any action on my part. Doesn’t seem like a credit card would have been any advantage in my [admittedly anecdotal] case.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          In the US if someone takes your debit card and enters the correct PIN, the transactions are permanent, and the bank has no obligation to give your money back (and if they choose to do so it would be out of their own pocket).

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well not to stop it before it happens, surely, but an easier time reclaiming your money due to the buffer.

      • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        But is it really worth all of the junk that you have to accept? I like the credit scoring, the monthly subscription, and, if you miss the date for paying back, the absurdly high fees. Well, yes, with the debit card you have, technically speaking, the risk of someone being able to make about 100€ worth of RFID payments, and then the code is needed again for the next 100€ RFID payments. For everything else that doesn’t involve RFID, the code is needed always.

        • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          The US implementation of chip and PIN left off the PIN. The reason given was “no one wants to put in a PIN every time” so for the vast majority of transactions you just hold up your card to the sensor or put it in the chip reader. PIN is only required for cash withdrawals in my experience.

          • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Jesus Christ, that is absolutely moronic. No wonder people are so obsessed with losing their card.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Debit cards typically have PIN numbers.

        I know these can be defeated in various ways, but its not usually as simple as, just steal someone’s card.

        Also, you can just go to your bank or credit union, call them, report online or w/e: Hey, my card got stolen, these txns are fraud.

        Might not be as streamlined or as fast as a payment challenge with a credit card, but its not that much worse.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Fiscally responsible people do it because of the cash back/perks and 0% interest.

      Fiscally irresponsible people do it because ‘free money’ (ignoring the 28% annual interest).

      Credit cards also offer better consumer protections than debit cards. Ex: chargebacks.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is not true for many countries. Debit cards in my country have equal or even better consumer protections than credit cards and are also cheaper.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s true in the United States. In the US, a debit card transaction is an EFTPOS (electronic funds transfer at point of sale) and once you enter your PIN, there are no take-backs and if you want a refund and the merchant refuses, you have to resort to the legal system for recourse. Credit cards, on the other hand, have consumer protection rules and dispute procedures.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      My debit card is a master card.

      They still need to go through a payment processor, using a debit instead of credit card isn’t really the solution to the current problems.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I buy stuff for work with my personal card and I’ve made probably thousands of dollars from the cash back. Even on my regular cards I get a couple hundred back off of stuff I normally buy.

      There’s other benefits too like using points to buy plane tickets, fancy lobbies in the airport with free food, etc.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You get points. I pay a fee on only one of my cards, the one that gives me 6% back on groceries. I make decent money using that card.

    • O_i@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve just got rid of my credit card after 10 years in NA. Yes it can come in handy if you need a couple grand all of a sudden but damn, what a ball and chain, I hated it

  • nexguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    If you do not know a lot about “crypto” then I would say the main thing to understand is that there is Bitcoin (not owned by any single entity) and then there is everything else. Other “coins” are owned by corporations that can make decisions about it and change it to some extent. These are extremely risky.

    Bitcoin (btc) does have risk but much less. It is not owned by any company or person or country. It is like the internet, only exists because tens of thousands of internet providers(miners for Bitcoin) around the world make it possible. Bitcoin has, in its codebase, a limitation that any change must be agreed upon by 95% of these providers(miners). This way security patches and bug fixes can be added because everyone agrees those are good. Other harmful changes would never reach 95% agreement therefor could never be implemented. There is a limit of 21 million Bitcoin and this number can never increase unless 95% agree to it… which they never would. This is in stark contrast to normal money which is constantly printed(at random rates depending on who happens to be in control at that moment) so that the supply increases making its value drop.

    Scamming happens with cryptos, Bitcoin, euros, dollars,yuan… and always will.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      What about Ethereum? I always thought Bitcoin was something to avoid since it’s proof-of-work.

      • PropaGandalf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        yeah, to me bitcoin is rather a interesting pioneeing project which now is obsolete. there are a ton of decentralized DLTs that re not bitcoin and not even a blockchain in some cases (like Holochain for example)

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Monero should be used. It’s the only really private/secure coin, although I think it’s proof of work too.

        • I’m really hoping we figure out an alternative to monero that is less energy intensive though. It’s bonkers inefficient compared to other coin to mine, super anonymous though, so trade offs

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Etherium, Solana…etc are the next level of more risky networks. They have distributed upgrade/change protocols as well but are not as decentralized as bitcoin. As for how efficient a coin is, I am not comparing that metric as efficiently does not correlate to risk. This post was just referring to risk.

    • Bubbey@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      If you’re paying for small good (25-50$) you usually pay in “Satoshis” 0.00000001 BTC. If you convert it to dollars, 10 satoshis is 1 cent.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      They should bring in subunits like an MMO. 1 bitcoin (118905USD) = 100 bitsilver 1 bitsilver (1189.05USD) = 100 bitcopper 1 bitcopper = 11.89USD

      It doesn’t even make any different to the number of bitcoin used, its just a more user friendly way of displaying it for small purchases.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        This already exists. 1 bitcoin = 1,000 mBTC = 100,000,000 satoshi. The exchange rate as of writing is about 846 satoshis = 1 USD or 982 satoshis = 1 EUR. The current usage is thusly:

        • Transaction fees on the main network are measured in sats/B (satoshis per [virtual] byte [of transaction size]).
        • Transactions on the Lightning Network, a lower-fee instant payment network that runs on top of the ordinary Bitcoin network, are all denominated in respect to satoshis. So a payment on the Lightning Network is traditionally regarded as, for example, 50,000 satoshis rather than 0.5 mBTC or 0.0005 BTC. And the fee on that payment is usually in the range of 50-100 satoshis.
        • Goods sold on the Lightning Network are typically priced in satoshis.
      • potoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Transfer failed.

        Oh, no! You’re out of GAScoins!

        SPECIAL OFFER: Fill Your GAScoin Tank Before 12:00 AM EST Friday and Log On for 7 Consecutive Days for a Chance to Win 10,000 Golden Eagles, a One-of-a-Kind Chug Jug Skin for Your Bitcopper Coins, and an Exclusive Golden Tesla Cybertruck Mount!

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      If that’s the biggest complaint you have about it, it’s probably not that bad.

      I don’t mind Bitcoin itself, but I do hate NFTs and pump and dump scams, obviously

      • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bitcoin is its own worst enemy. It’s deflationary, speculative, and largely interacted with by centralized entities. Those things means its unlikely to be successful as an actual currency; even one it hopes to be.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Things are often measured in mBTC or µBTC for this exact reason.

      Just as you don’t measure the length of an ant in meters, you measure it in millimeters.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      It was far less valuable when it first started becoming trendy. 1 BTC for a pizza, or whatever. Now it’s turned into a hyperinflation wheelbarrow kind of situation.

    • ilillilillilillililli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Monkey brain no like small numbers. Monkey brain like big numbers.

      But for real, Bitcoin was the first decentalized currency to solve the Byzantine Generals Problem. Its worth something because its transparent, unmutable, and the original digital currency. It was birthed via grassroot origins in depths of the housing crash. It calls out the Federal Reserve (and any other human institution that seeks to expand their money supply).

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s one of the least bad things about it, and if not for approximately twelve thousand bad things about it, would be easily fixable.