So what he’s saying is the billionaires funding ai can’t afford to do it legitimately
Of course not! If they did then they’d be several fractions of a billion less wealthy!
How very socialist of him
So why can’t I read them for free too? Only massive billion dollar companies get stuff for free?
I would like to announce that I am pioneering a new AI program. Give me access to all of the movies for free please.
So why can’t I read them for free too?
I can. Don’t you have libraries in your country?
deleted by creator
Argh, that sucks.
Settle down, nerds. TACO just read from the card they gave him. He doesn’t think anything about AI. Of course, he’ll make the wrong decisions and cause utter chaos and strife but it’s not like he has an actual opinion about AI.
Also, he’s talking about AI companies, i.e. the people who bribe him. How insolent of you plebes to assume you’d get the same rights.
What if president brainrot accidentally kills intellectual property, even glitched out cuckoo clocks are right occasionnally by chance!
He gets the papers already ready to sign, I can’t imagine him writing bills.
At most he can choose the name of the bill, as shown by the latest one, it’s so obvious that even stupid algorithms can guess it
Bonus content:
Wake up baby, deepseek today is uncensored
“I need it for my business plan to work out” is not a great legal argument for when you’re trying to override others rights.
Ah, but yet…
“You can’t be expected to get a successful higher education when every article, book, or anything else that you’ve read or studied, you’re supposed to pay for.”
Can a human be expected to have a successful life when they have to pay for knowledge they need access to? I am not against the opinion that information should be free and freely accessible. But does this courtesy also extend to the common folk or is it exclusive to expensive machines and their owners? You wouldn’t download a United States government. da-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na
We shouldn’t be calling these AI programs successful. In the slightest. They’re counterfeiting human thought and work.
I know it’s popular to hate on LLMs here at Lemmy, but what is “Artificial Intelligence” if not “Counterfeiting Thought”? Those words map to each other pretty nicely
Actually, let me add to my statement of it being intentional.
There are things that AI applications can do that humans can’t.
AI is all about analyzing large sets of variables and finding things. Take recent studies in pathology where AI can find the patterns of certain disease in tissue specimens. This only works because the enormous dataset that was provided was already vetted by pathologists. I would argue this isn’t counterfeiting human thought. This is enhancing an already utilized algorithm trained by doctors. Remember, a pathologist still needs to put their license on the line if they agree with the AI findings.
There is NO accountability in LLMs. To many people it looks like it is thinking, it has understood what the person has said, and considered boundaries that exist in our minds, but maybe not communicated to the LLM.
Thats why I call these AI programs unsuccessful and counterfeit. They’re giving users made by possibly unverified and unreliable data with no accountability.
It was intentional.
I mean, your point is accurate, but your point itself qualifies as “hate on LLMs”.
Sometime I wish lemmy had ahah react
Except they’re not. Fair use allows them to use freely available sources. Ever hear of “non-fiction”?
Go ahead and copy-paste some news articles and sell them as your own. That’ll go great.
Go ahead and use chatGPT and see it list its sources.
So Pro Piracy argument … So no more patents or copyrights
Not for you, silly, only if you’re too rich and big!
Big-league bigly its a big fucking club and we ain’t in. It
I’ll setup a JellAIfin server immediately. It’s just the regular Jellyfin code, but I am compiling my own version - it has “AI” added as a comment to every line of code before I compiled.
There was an episode of behind the bastards I was listening to a while back where they mentioned some dude who was using an AI tool to scrape the internet to steal other people’s art, so people started doing something that prevented him from optimally stealing their art.
I can’t remember what exactly, but the guy started whining that whatever people were doing was “illegal” bc it was damaging his tool he was using to steal other people’s shit for his own profit. Like somebody telling you that it’s illegal to prevent them from efficiently stealing your property bc it interferes with their livelihood. How dare you!
Anyway, that’s the kind of vibes I get from this.
Funny that when it was about protecting profits copyright was such a cornerstone principle but when it’s about protecting profits it can also be set aside.
> law passes > buy servers > create piracy site > call it AIbay > have all kinds of things there under a synonymous name > when interrogated tell them you have a proprietary technology that you won't release to competitorsShut up orange paedophile.
haha ur so brave
Don’t spend one more dollar on educational material. If a person had to pay for every textbook and online subscription, education would be impractical.
Brb training an llm on the criterion collection. It’s for educational purposes.
Then maybe AI “programs” aren’t a good product. Next it will be, “we can’t be expected to make a good murderbot without murdering some people”
Proceeds to start wars with every ethnicity to ensure the murder bots are trained to kill all variants of the population. “Of course they have to kill little people, how else will we know that a little person couldn’t judo chop them to death.”
Lolz. Fuck you, fat dickhead.
