• @glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10510 days ago

    No they won’t lol

    If they didn’t do it already, it’s not gonna happen now. This is lip service to the shareholders

    • @CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      89 days ago

      They want more users to make accounts. Blocking nsfw content to non-users was a start but now they can make a bigger push.

      • @glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5110 days ago

        Is it? Reddit has been full of bots for years.

        And if the r/CMV thing didn’t make it apparently, the recent wave of them weren’t “caught in the act” and only became a “problem” when the researchers announced their shitty experiment.

        If realistic chat bots can fool the masses, why on earth would reddit get rid of them? It helps their metrics. “Look at how active our site is! Buy stock!”

        • HobbitFoot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          710 days ago

          Meta is paying to make its bots, Reddit gets it for free!

        • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 days ago

          half of thier site are bots, RUSSIA probably makes a majority of those bots, something reddit isnt doing anything about

        • @doodledup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -59 days ago

          I know you enjoy hating on Reddit but what you’re saying doesn’t make any sense. Reddit is an advertising business. Bots don’t view advertising but adds infrastructure cost. Additionally, humans are way better at engagement with the platform and people than bots.

          • @glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            189 days ago

            Bot activity brings “engagement” which generated more page views from actual humans. Literally the only downside of this announcement is the optics of having bots in the first place.

            The bots were already indistinguishable from humans on reddit, do you really think that this recent scrutiny is going to lead to fewer bots? Or might it actually lead to better bots?

          • @zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            09 days ago

            Additionally additionally, as it says in the article, reddit sells its content to OpenAI, and in order to do that, they need it to be organic. If you feed AI output back info AI, it makes the output worse, not better. So, there’s another financial incentive to ensure that the people talking on reddit are actually human.

            • @glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              79 days ago

              If openai kept buying reddit data after 2022, they are idiots. They let the cat out of the bag.

            • @atrielienz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              I would like to remind you of two things. The first is that reddit used to have a mod tool called “BotDefense”. Its shutdown in July of 2023 directly lead to a major uptick in Spam Bots.

              The second is that part of the ad revenue is “impressions”. Impressions are just an account (bot or human) “viewing” the ad and they do not require a click-through. The platform hosting the ad still gets paid for those.

      • @CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 days ago

        No it isn’t and they have openly talked about doing this practice back in the early days of reddit to make the site appear more active than it really was. Nothing has changed.

      • @Merva@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        09 days ago

        Where on Earth have you gotten that bizarre idea? It is in their interest to promote engagement, human or not, by any means necessary.

  • Libra00
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6310 days ago

    Yeah it’s definitely the bots and not the fashy admins that drove me away from reddit.

    • @makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2710 days ago

      I mean the bots don’t help. The sheer number of obviously AI subreddits and response farms is crazy. There’s like 6 prominent “Am I the Assholes”, a bunch of text message “screenshot” subreddits which have always been easy to fake, and a bunch of “explain the joke” ones too. I stop reading halfway through most text posts and comments because it’s obviously AI

      • Libra00
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 days ago

        That’s fair, it just seems like that if they’re going down the list of problems looking for things they can do to make reddit a better place, it doesn’t make sense to not start at the top.

        • @Grostleton@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 days ago

          “Better for who?” is the question you need to ask yourself, because it’s absolutely not the users anymore.

      • Libra00
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 days ago

        I mean it’s definitely both, but the fashy admins were the last straw.

    • @booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 days ago

      Everyone has their own reasons. If you disagree with their management, then you should celebrate other people choosing to leave, even if for different reasons than your own.

      • Libra00
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 days ago

        I’m not complaining about people leaving, just saying the bots are not the biggest problem.

  • billwashere
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    What and destroy 90% of their traffic?!?

    “That’s a bold move, Cotton. Let’s see if it pays off for ’em.”

  • @_druid@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3410 days ago

    This has nothing to do with bots. Verification comes with more info provided on your part, which they will sell.

    • SerotoninSwells
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 days ago

      It can be both. Reddit has a history of fabricating conversations. The way they sell advertising implies a certain level of engagement from their user base which can lead to bots pushing products in the form of reviews or by mention.

      I think it’s worth noting that Reddit, at one time, did have third party bot protection; however, it only protected their advertising. I can only imagine what the rest of their traffic looks like, but I would not be surprised if they were using bots of their own.

      Like you said, they can make some money selling your information but they can also control the narrative how they choose.

  • @SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    *reddit will tag their own chatgpt bots to prevent them from being banned, and then through false positives will ban the last of the real users from the site.

    • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 days ago

      i bet they also ignore half of the propaganda bots to look fair in thier moderations. the only signicant bannings we see is actual users, and the low hanging fruits, of and people posting links to thier businesses.

  • @RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    148 days ago

    I don’t believe that for 1 millisecond.

    Spez won’t be able to stop himself from enshitifying reddit in any way he can to appease those VC pump&dump scammers he’s spent the last decade ruining reddit for.

  • @CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1110 days ago

    Don’t think they’re doing this out of the goodness of the hearts, they’re just trying to avoid the “shit in, shit out” affect of their data sample.