Fuck the stupid morons who defend Apple.

Imagine if Microsoft banned Windows users from installing the software they want on their computer.

Imagine if Microsoft required all software developers to give them 30% of their earning or Microsoft will ban them from Windows

  • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3621 days ago

    Hating on Apple for their 30% cut is popular.

    Hating on Google for their 30% cut is popular.

    Hating on Microfot, Sony, and Nintendo for their cuts is popular.

    But somehow hating on Steam for their 30% cut is going too far.

    • @dwazou@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Microsoft, Apple, Exxon, Meta, Amazon, JP Morgan or Saudi Aramco are the most powerful corporations in the world. They are empires more powerful than many nations. Their CEOs always travel with armed men. They have the personal phone number of Donald Trump and Xi Jinping.

      It’s healthy to scrutinize them. Steam is a problem, but Valve is nowhere near as powerful.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1320 days ago

      I’d like to see a game developer chiming in but as a user, 30% cut by Steam feels justified.

      They have helped me discover and buy many games that I wouldn’t have even heard of otherwise. Compare that to Google Play Store which is full of dogshit shovelware and Pay2Win games.

      And sometimes I’ve even bought Steam keys via Fanatical bundles, where I chose which games to buy by looking at their Steam store pages. Steam got nothing from these transactions as far as I know.

      This is without getting into other useful stuff like guides and forums hosted by Steam which I can look at whenever I get stuck. Or Steam workshop which allows users to easily mod the games.

      Call me a fanboy but I’m tired of this ‘what about Steam’ comments.

      Ask Sony, Microsoft, Google, and Nintendo to improve their stores instead.

    • @lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1321 days ago

      I’m less mad at Steam and Google because there are clear, simple ways to avoid their cuts.

      I have no basis to say whether they’re providing a service worth the 30% charge. I’m also less mad at Steam than at Google because they’re being less shady about trying to push people into their store too.

    • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      You get value from Steam for paying that.

      What value do you get from Apple for paying the Apple tax? A higher price for a phone that could cost 500€ less?

      • Semperverus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        420 days ago

        As a Linux gamer, valve making proton has launched gaming on linux into the stratosphere.

      • @TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -120 days ago

        What exactly is the value that steam provides with its 30% cut that Apple doesn’t provide? Not defending Apple by the way.

        Openness of the hardware is a valid point but that isn’t exactly a feature of steam (nor a distinction between the other platforms in OPs comment)

        • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          220 days ago

          Apple forces me to stay there.
          Valve offers me to stay there. The whole market and review system is incredibly important as I can see if it’s even worth it to buy. Where else can you see reviews besides comparing numerous comments under video reviews?

          • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            012 days ago

            If you delete your steam account or decide you no longer want to ise their login/launcher or Valve decides to ban you, what happens to all your past purchases?

            You’re locked in. You just have Stockholm Syndrome for the company that started the online requirement bullshit everything has today by locking Half-Life 2 behind a mandatory online service, then letting other devs force the same bullshit instead of just loading up a disc and playing the game.

            • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              111 days ago

              I can certainly close my account and install games from other store fronts on my PC.
              Valve is neither forcing me on my SteamDeck nor on my PC to use Steam.
              I use emulators on my deck and also installed EA Origin and successfully launched titles on it.

              And Apple was only recently forced to allow devs outlinks to their respective shopping pages (currently only in the US). Just the priviledge to link users to the subscription page to circumvent apple trying to get a cut.
              That is actually lock in.
              On Android I can do what I want. And if I so desire I could install an alternative OS on it.
              Try that with an iPhone.

      • @ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -720 days ago

        You get value from Steam for paying that

        Are you crazy? You know how much money that is? And this isn’t taken from the distributors cut we get higher 30% prices because of it.

    • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      820 days ago

      Steam is not the only means of distribution anywhere, and you can often buy the same game both from Steam and directly.

      It’s too early to hate it.

      (Well, I mean, I want a FreeBSD native Steam client with native Proton and all infrastructure, but I can understand that it’s a small percentage, even if not that different from Linux support.)

    • @rbits@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      I agree that the 30% cut is too much. The only reason I give them a pass is because Steam is really good (at least, as a user). But I still want them to lower it.

      • @barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        420 days ago

        For a dev those 30% are very much worth it because Steam has tons of customers and very good recommendation algorithms, you gain more in additional sales than what you lose from the cut. Could they do with less probably but they’re not extorting devs. There’s a reason why Epic had to do stuff like guarantee sales and provide huge advances to get anyone onto their excuse for a platform.

    • @TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      420 days ago

      I get why people like steam. But as a steam hater, if GabeN ever dies and the kids or whoever is heirs are decide to sell to VCs or private equity. That 30% will be just as oppressive as anyone else’s.

      • @SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        321 days ago

        Gaben is a hardcore libertarian as well. And owns a billion dollar armada of yachts.

        No he’s one of the good ones /s

        • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Valve’s response to George Floyd was to give each employee a certain amount of money and let them choose which charity to give it to (if they did give it to charity), which means they could just as well give it to an anti BLM movement if they wanted to.

    • @Cossty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -521 days ago

      Steam’s 30% is the last of their problems, I would like them to finally start actually moderating Steam forums. Because devs of the particular game usually don’t care. Visit some forums of newly released popular game and it’s full of bigots, misogyny, trolls and hate. It’s unbelievable.

      Go check oblivion remastered

      • ZeroOne
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Bigots, Misogyny, Trolls & Hate is translation for I want people censored because I am on a power-trip. These are vague & nebulous & why don’t you & your buddies go counter them

        & Good one mate, because I have been there.

    • Magnus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -120 days ago

      They are pushing but sadly that fine is only %0.1 of each companies annual revenue for that year alone. They can go as high as 10%.

      So yes they are making headway but they are far from restoring some level of sanity between big corporations and society at large.

    • @lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1620 days ago

      Well, half a billion is still a lot of money so it’s great that the union got it so they can spend it on something useful. Half a billion USD is the entire yearly revenue of some fairly large companies in Sweden.

      And the fine is not intended to bankrupt Apple, it’s intended to punish them and as a show of force. If Apple still refuses to comply or even pay the fine, the fines would obviously escalate and the max fine on this offence is very very high.

      Also remember that the EU generally only cares what they do inside the EU, they care about how it affects EU citizens. So it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to issue brutally high fines based on yearly global revenue yet.

  • 🌶️ - knighthawk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1921 days ago

    except only loosing 568m is just “the price of doing business” for them and it’s not much of a deterrent to make them stop. they made more than that by doing this so it’s still a net profit

  • Ogmios
    link
    fedilink
    English
    721 days ago

    $568m is a day Apple will never get back!

  • Magnus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    620 days ago

    The fine represents %0.1 of Apple’s annual revenue for 2024. That’s right. That’s how little the fine is in the grand scheme of things. And they are STILL mad.

    Also, the EU can go as high as 10%.

    • @barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      220 days ago

      20% for repeat offenders.

      Historically EU fines are bad at stopping companies from trying shit, but they are good at stopping the behaviour. The money, btw, doesn’t go towards the EU’s budget it goes towards the member states’ contributions, everyone gets a rebate.