I know Gnome is the default on popular distros: Fedora, Ubuntu, Rhel, Pop OS (it’s Cosmic Desktop yes but it is still based on Gnome)…etc. But Gnome just doesnt work for me. I would pick XFCE - stable and no BS.

Before Manjaro and their cetificate shenanigan, I used to use their XFCE version. At the time, it was marketed as the “Flagship Manjaro version”. I went 4 years without any problems and I did tinker a lot, just couldnt get their XFCE to break.

After a tough Arch or Gentoo installs, I just want to put XFCE on and call it a day.

What about you guys?

  • @Kory@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    4524 days ago

    That’s not too hard a question for me, I’ve been using the same DE for years: KDE

    • @aksdb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1424 days ago

      KDE is one of the main reasons for me to use Linux. I immensely like the performance, silence and battery lifetime of MacBooks. But if I have to work with anything but KDE, it’s not worth it for me. The only thing OSX does better than basically any other desktop out there, is the ability to drag whole virtual screen between monitors.

      • @jamie_oliver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        223 days ago

        I’m running XFCE (but you could do KDE) on my intel Mac, you can get best of both worlds. I heard silicon is more difficult with Linux tho.

    • @hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      223 days ago

      Has KDE improved since 2010-ish? I gave up KDE because gnome was just a better DE at the time. Gnome sucks now, but I found i3/sway. Haven’t given KDE a second chance yet

  • @warmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1523 days ago

    KDE Plasma.

    It has been great for gaming, adopting Wayland protocols at a faster rate than other DEs due in part thanks to Valve’s contributions.

    I freaking love GNOME & Adwaita, but I’ll switch back when I deem it better than Plasma.

  • @slembcke@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    1423 days ago

    Definitely Gnome here. Though I have a long list of notes, it mostly just works exactly like I expect with little friction or guessing. I donate $100/year to both Gnome and KDE since they are both good pieces of software, and I love that I get to chose mine. Further, I think KDE is the logical choice for something like the SteamDeck where it’s going to have a lot of gamers that expect computers to work like Windows. (even if I don’t like it, >_<)

  • AugustWest
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1323 days ago

    KDE. Been upgrading the same environment for 5 years just keeps getting better.

    I started around maybe KDE 3?

    • @InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      223 days ago

      Was on KDE 2, KDE 3 was absolutely incredible, ran it on Mac when it was supported on xquartz.

      4 was a mess, but got better, 5 & 6 are fine, but it’s overall far better than any other DE, it’s just so customizable, the only other thing that comes close is xmonad or something.

  • @Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    1123 days ago

    My computer doesn’t really break, I’m Ship of Theseus-ing it regularly.

    Apart from that, the only one among the normal window based ones that has felt like it respects my will to configure stuff in ways that feel right to me has been KDE Plasma.

  • @oldfart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    1024 days ago

    XFCE, using it for over 10 years, not planning to change it unless the DE changes radically.

  • Lka1988
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Cinnamon by and far.

    I’ve used so many distros and DEs I don’t even know where to begin, but Cinnamon got me hooked for the long run. It’s legitimately the most polished and “ready to run” DE I’ve ever used, yet still allowing for far more customization than Windows ever offered.

    • @milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      222 days ago

      Cinnamon’s been working well for me; I’d choose that, and I don’t mind waiting till my laptop breaks to reassess what DE I want!

  • @pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    823 days ago

    I’d say Gnome, since I’m so used to it that I feel it doesn’t get in the way of the things I’m doing.
    Because that would be my aim: something that doesn’t interfere with the work I am doing.

  • @lengau@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    723 days ago

    This isn’t even hard. KDE without a second thought.

    I regularly try other desktops, and I regularly come back to the only desktop with any sort of reasonable thought put into it.

  • @GustavoM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    724 days ago

    I don’t mind a little “change” every now and then, but still – “Sway” on my “potatoes” (Orange pi zero 3 and Orange pi 5 max) and “Hyprland” on my x86_64 PC.

    • @aedyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      524 days ago

      My daily driver is Arch running sway. Would be hard to go back from the simplicity and elegance.

    • @hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      124 days ago

      Isn’t sway based on i3? i3 is a WM not a DE. But as sway is not X11, I’m not sure if it’s just a WM

      • @Static_Rocket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        223 days ago

        Sway still primarily counts as a WM + Compositor, but considering it has keymaps, autostart, and libinput config mechanisms embedded in it, I would say it borders a desktop environment.