Any recommendations for a linux distro that i can set up and be reasonably sure my non techy SO won’t break accidentally? The set up doesn’t have to be easy it just has to not break once I leave her alone with it. My first thought was popOS.

My plan is to have 2 profiles and not give her access to sudo. I just don’t want to have to go into it unless she needs a new program.

  • @JASN_DE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    342 months ago

    Fedora Atomic desktops, specifically Kinoite with KDE6 works well for me, and is basically unbreakable due to the way it works.

    • @oaklandnative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I vote the same, but I’d suggest a uBlue spin of the Fedora Atomic desktops. They have better defaults (all batteries included, as they say) and are easier to use overall IMHO. Bluefin and Bazzite are both great options, and both offer KDE and Gnome variants.

      https://universal-blue.org/

      Edit: TIL the KDE version of Bluefin is called Aurora.

      BTW, uBlue is getting some big recognition lately. They have been on the Fedora Podcast (official) and Framework Laptops has official instructions on their website for installing Bluefin and Bazzite.

    • @deadcream@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      32 months ago

      Fedora is a bit too eager to deliver new updates IMO, especially KDE. As much as I love KDE, their .0 releases have had serious bugs several times in a row now. It’s always better to wait for .1 patch with Plasma. It may be hard for the user to break Kinoite, but it won’t save them from bugs.

      Fedora’s mission have always been to push new stuff when it’s “mostly ready” at the cost of inconveniencing of some users, so I wouldn’t recommend it for non-tech-savvy people.

      I know people say that it’s 100% stable for them (as they do for Arch, Tumbleweed, Debian Sid, etc) but that’s survirorship bias. As any bleeding edge distro, Fedora has its periods of stability that are broken by tumultuous transitions to the new and shiny tech (like it was with Pipewire, Wayland default, major DE upgrades, etc). During these times some people’s setup will break and you don’t know ahead of time if it will be yours.

      • @asap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Pick one of the stable channels from Universal Blue. You get the Fedora atomic goodness, but “ready” rather than “mostly ready”.

        • @deadcream@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          Does it use the same flawed approach as Manjaro by indiscriminately delaying all updates (including critical security fixes)?

          • @asap@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It would be whatever Fedora is doing in stable, but that seems unlikely. I’m sure the internet has the answer.

            I’ve been on the latest branch for a year and it’s been rock solid across 2 different laptops.

            • @deadcream@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I don’t think Fedora has a “stable” channel. It has “testing” repo from which updates are pushed to “updates” repo after approval, and that’s it. My understanding is that ublue’s “latest” channel follows Fedora’s “updates”, while “stable” seems to update weekly (though it’s unclear what happens if a package update arrives in Fedora just before “stable” image is about to be built)

      • ☂️-
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        eh, gnome is about the same.

        i always wait for at least the .1 or .2

        • @deadcream@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          Haven’t used GNOME for a while, but I guess that’s a problem of open source projects in general. Though GNOME at least has Red Hat behind it.

  • @penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    242 months ago

    I’ve set up Linux mint for my sister in law and didn’t hear from her the whole two years she was in college. But nowadays we have immutable distros. They’re fantastic for a set it and forget it kinda thing. They’re solid for those who don’t want things to break.

    • @FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      While I enjoy using Aurora, there were a bunch of issues popping up over the last few months (e.g. display freezes). I guess that’s the danger of a rolling release cycle, but I’m not sure it’s 100% as foolproof as it needs to be right now.

  • @enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 months ago

    I’m gonna be the boring guy.

    RedHat Enterprise Linux. (Or Rocky)

    Most boring distro ever. Install it, turn on all the auto updates and be happy. Install something to take backups. Ignore any new major-releases, that laptop will die before the OS hits EOL.

    Benefits:

    • Boring. It’s their tool, not your plaything.
    • Actually works
    • Will be reasonably secure over time with minimal effort and manual intervention.
    • If any commercial Linux software is required, it will most likely only be supported on RHEL or Ubuntu.
    • Provides web browser and word-processing. And we don’t need anything else.

    Drawbacks:

    • Boring (for you)
    • Not ideal for gaming

    If you install anything else than RHEL-derivatives or possibly Ubuntu on a machine that someone else will use, you are both in for a world of pain. It has to ”just work” without intervention by you, and it needs to keep working that way for the next 5 years.

    Source: Professionally deploying and supporting multiuser desktop Linux to a few thousand users other than myself.

  • @pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Since less techy people tend to use more the mouse/touchpad anyways, I would pick a hard-to-mess-with desktop environment like Cinnamon or Gnome. With KDE, XFCE and such you can screw panels really easily if you don’t know what you’re doing.
    Slap Debian under it and there you go

  • @maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Use Bluefin or some other immutable/atomic distro.

    The upside is that it’s rock solid and will likely never fail in a way that cant be easily rolled back. The downside being that it’s slightly more complex to administer than a traditional distro model (which probably isn’t a big problem if you are going to be administering your SO’s PC for the most part.)

    Bluefin is basically a more general desktop, less gaming-focused version of Bazzite. Bluefin uses Gnome, but there’s also a KDE Plasma version called Aurora.

  • @inzen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I guess it depends what she does on her pc.

    But ignoring that, Mint without sudo. Throw in flatpaks and appimages.

    Immutable distros are probably fine too but in my experience they tend to be a bit fussy if you need to change something in the system config.

    Ubuntu, always a solid choice for beginners but Gnome shell is a bigger change from windows conpared to Cinamon.

    P.S. I have Mint on our TV PC and my SO handdles it without issues.

  • @kittenroar@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 months ago

    An immutable distro would be a good choice. They are distros designed to be more resilient against failure. For a gamer, bazzite is a solid choice; otherwise, silverblue.

  • @rescue_toaster@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    62 months ago

    I switched from ubuntu to debian when 12 was released and it’s been fine. Only thing i was worried about was running WoW via lutris but had no issues.

    So when my SO windows pc died we bought some newish parts and i installed debian on it as well. Also installed chrome since that’s her browser of choice. She’s still getting used to gnome, but all she needs is browser, WoW, and libreoffice, which is close enough that it hasnt been an issue. She doesn’t even know how to update the system.

  • downhomechunk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 months ago

    I’ve got my wife and 5 year old on slackware. They wouldn’t know how to screw it up if they wanted to!

  • @Gayhitler@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 months ago

    Does she want this?

    If so then just set her up exactly what you have so you can easily help when there’s a problem.

    If not then get her the computer she actually wants.

      • @Gayhitler@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Consider 0patch before you give up on windows. They do good work and it’s real affordable.

        No matter what you do, in this circumstance it’s worth keeping that windows partition around.

        I do think whatever you use is the right choice though.

        E: I looked up the 0patch pricing and you get a year of patches for a bunch of eol versions of windows like 7 and 10 for $25 a year. It’s a good deal I think for people who don’t want to or can’t upgrade to 11, and they beat Microsoft to a bunch of zero day exploits.

        I know you said it’s a no money kind of situation but I really think when ten is still a possibility theres two bucks and some change a month in the budget.

        • @asap@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Consider 0patch before you give up on windows

          Unless there’s a very specific application need, I think the most sensible thing would be to ditch Windows. Better for security, better for privacy, better for the world to increase the mainstreaming of Linux.

          • @Gayhitler@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            Yeah wouldn’t it be nice…

            But the most considerate thing for the user is to help them use what they want to use. There’s also a real benefit to keeping ahold of that windows because people often have their own ways of doing things and it may be more expedient to boot back into 10 than to figure out how to complete some task in Linux.

        • @mumei@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          Aren’t there ways to patch the whatever-it-is that is “required” by W11 that older PCs don’t have so that you can bypass the check and have W11 on older machines? I feel like that’s a better solution than paying for Microsoft’s garbage, if one was bent on not moving to Linux

          • @Gayhitler@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            I suggested 0patch not to bypass some arbitrary check, for which there are many options, but to provide access to security patches and updates after Microsoft stops publishing them for 10.

  • Anna
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If you’re not going to give her sudo access then I’d say it’ll be really hard maybe even impossible to screw up. Also maybe setup a cron job that’ll do auto updates and if needed add in a check to make sure it isn’t uninstalling anything. Also how about immutable distro.