hellostick@lemm.ee to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoVirt-Manager, use deb version of flatpak version??message-squaremessage-square9linkfedilinkarrow-up125arrow-down13
arrow-up122arrow-down1message-squareVirt-Manager, use deb version of flatpak version??hellostick@lemm.ee to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square9linkfedilink
minus-squareliliumstar@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 year agoI would use the native version. For something like this, it makes sense that it should have less restricted/sandboxed access to the underlying system.
minus-squarealteredEnvoy@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 year agoHmm, wouldn’t the virt manager just be a frontend and communicate with the virtd socket though?
minus-squarehellostick@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoi am not sure which one is the native version… you mean the version packaged by the distro (deb) or the developer (flatpak)?
minus-squareliliumstar@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoIn this case I meant the one packaged by your distro.
I would use the native version. For something like this, it makes sense that it should have less restricted/sandboxed access to the underlying system.
Hmm, wouldn’t the virt manager just be a frontend and communicate with the virtd socket though?
i am not sure which one is the native version… you mean the version packaged by the distro (deb) or the developer (flatpak)?
In this case I meant the one packaged by your distro.