• @Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1716 months ago

    I just hope federal services (like applying for a passport) don’t become Twitter-only after Trump appoints Elon as Secretary of Enshittification.

    • @cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      [Deleted]

      I’ve made a huge mistake breaking my personal rule to avoid all political content and I’ve regretted that immediately

      • @TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        846 months ago

        Thing is, mate…fascists rarely stay inside their boarders. This is going to be the whole world’s problem in about 3 months.

        • ☂️-
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          international us policy is very similar between republicans and democrats. you guys are already the whole worlds problem. 🌍🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀

          im sorry but trump will be your problem. until the empire decides to turn up the violence dial again that is, which is something both parties do sometimes.

        • @barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Trump wants adulation, not conquest. Push come to shove you can get him out of the oval office by making him figurehead Emperor, as long as it comes with immunity he’ll accept.

          On a scale of Mussolini to Hitler, he’s like 250% towards Mussolini.

      • @glowinfly@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        246 months ago

        4 years if laws and constitution stay the same and are followed… first term he had people alienated into him who were at least slightly appropriated for their positions, this time people who has nothing to do with their positions are being appointed simply for being loyal to him… Let’s see if any of them won’t let him do anything drastic within 4 YEARS

      • @zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s more than 4 years. We just crawled out of Trump inflation and now are going right back in.

        Dismantling and breaking is easy. They can do a lot of that in 4 yrs. Building takes decades.

        There’s also a global effect. Would Putin have ever attacked Ukraine without a Trump term? How about Israel’s taking self defense into genocide territory?

        America leads by example and the last example was an impulsive 3 yo with a giant military force and a dead diplomacy department in the executive branch. There’s permissiveness in that.

  • Juice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    646 months ago

    Bummer that isn’t mastodon but any inconvenience to musk is appreciated

    • Encrypt-Keeper
      link
      fedilink
      English
      336 months ago

      I say this as someone who likes fediverse microblogging (Mastodon, MissKey, etc) it will never be Mastodon. Mastodon and its maintainers are staunchly against all the things that would make it a viable replacement to Twitter.

        • @Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          136 months ago

          They don’t like algorithms. They want you to select which content you see.

          That’s all I’ve got. Mastodon is a better, more open tech. And it’s pretty easy to get set up, relatively. It’s insane that companies haven’t jumped on it.

          You don’t even have to quit Twitter. You can just post to more than one place and give people the option.

          • @kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            This is what happens when someone can’t put themselves into their user’s shoes and then wonder why a product isn’t doing as well as it is.

            They proclaim the product is great, it’s everyone else that’s the problem

  • @daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Why people cannot see that the core problem of twitter is not that it got bought by the asshole billionaire. It’s that the asshole billionaire was able to buy it.

  • @zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    436 months ago

    Let’s replace one proprietary service with another. It looks so good with its API wide open, like it’s never getting enshittified.

  • @beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    426 months ago

    Countdown until it turns out that everybody associated with any competition to Musk’s companies just so happens to be a criminal Trump siccs his DOJ after: 5… 4…

    • @JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      126 months ago

      I wouldn’t discount the possibility that bsky is backed by the same dark money pool that bought twitter. putin found that it’s way too easy to buy elections worldwide just using social media. They’ll never give it up.

    • @Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      106 months ago

      There was a good explanation about why not mastodon the other day. It basically boils down to Bluesky is just an easier transition.

      • @kazerniel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        Yeah, that’s what I heard from my microblogging colleagues too. They tried Mastodon during the first wave of Twitter exodus, found it too frustrating/difficult, tried Bluesky and stuck with it ever since.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 months ago

      Mastodon is more of a protocol than a single service. It succeeds/fails on those terms, in the same way the old Web1.0 protocols did. Which is to say, you can’t enshitify a thousand micro-sites at once like you can enshittify one big site that’s under central control. But you also can’t do things like navigate, search, and socialize efficiently.

      Mastodon is successful in large part because it isn’t. When you let a single cartel of corporate psychos run a Mastodon account like they would a Twitter or Facebook, you end up with Truth Social (literally just a Mastodon branch instance).

      • @nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56 months ago

        That’s an interesting perspective. Do you think the same about lemmy? While also decentralized using the sameprotocol, it seems reasonably efficient to me. I’m from a small instance from my country, and the global content is easily available to me.

        I just have a lot of trouble explaining how it works to people who aren’t tech savy… this is what I consider the main issue withthe fediverse as a whole.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          Do you think the same about lemmy?

          I think it depends on how the federated sites are administered going forward. We’ve already seen bigger sites - like Threads, for instance - try to integrate into the overall ecosystem. And I could see a future in which one of the larger instances - a .world or .sh.itjust.works - is too much for a handful of amateur admins to handle. Hand off the instance to a venture capital firm and you could see rapid enshitification.

          I just have a lot of trouble explaining how it works to people who aren’t tech savy…

          I’m reasonably tech savvy and even I’d struggle to tell you exactly how it works. How is .world hosted? Is it load-balanced or otherwise optimized? Who controls registration and which other instances does it integrate with? How do you find a list of active instances to federate against? Who do you even talk to in order to federate with another instance? What does the API look like and which instances allow you to crawl them? How do bots integrate with the environment and what can an admin do to limit them? No idea.

          There’s a bunch of things I think I should be able to do but I can’t. For instance, signing into .world but only surfing content that’s hosted on .sh.itjust.works.

          There’s also a lot of petty politics. Admins deciding on a whim who to block, whether it be individuals or whole instances. Waking up one day and suddenly not having access to a dozen of my favorite subs, because two admins are feuding, is not particularly fun. I never have a problem like that on BlueSky or Instagram.

          • @prototype_g2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            a .world or .sh.itjust.works - is too much for a handful of amateur admins to handle. Hand off the instance to a venture capital firm and you could see rapid enshitification.

            Lemmy is federalized. It is expected that many .worlders would just jump ship to another instance. And I don’t see how the venture capital firm could stop them… For as long as one organization doesn’t control 60%+ of all user’s instances we should be unshitifiable. It is possible for enshitification to happen… but it is of a greater difficulty, because the other non-shit instances still exist and they are federated, thus able to access the same content.

            They could try and pull up the drawbridge and de-federate from every other instance that isn’t under the control of the firm so that the content of the venture capital instances are exclusive, but for as long as they don’t control 60%+ of all user’s instances we are good.

            It is not to hard to imagine that, if .world where to be sold like that, half or more would jump ship. At least that’s what I hope.

            • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 months ago

              It is expected that many .worlders would just jump ship to another instance.

              Why? Why wouldn’t they just consume the click bait content and shameless pandering propagated by the incoming owner, just like folks still on Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit?

              For as long as one organization doesn’t control 60%+ of all user’s instances

              You don’t need 60% of instances. You need the plurality of site content. That’s what the users are coming for.

              • @prototype_g2@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 months ago

                just like folks still on Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit?

                As I said, Lemmy is federalized. Jumping from Twitter to BlueSky/Mastodon or Reddit to Lemmy is difficult due to the network effect. The people you want to follow aren’t posting on BlueSky/Mastodon/Lemmy because there isn’t an audience there. It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy.

                However, Lemmy is federalised, that means you can change instances without loosing access to the people/content you follow. Sure, the fediverse isn’t immune to corporate takeover, but it is more resilient.

                Migrating from Reddit means you loose access to all Reddit content. Migrating from .world to, I don’t know…, .ml means nothing sense you can still access .world’s content.

                You need the plurality of site content

                I wouldn’t say plurality. If the biggest instance only had 10% of total content, that 10% being taken over by a corp wouldn’t kill Lemmy. That 10% would be too little to perform the drawbridge strategy and so people could migrate to a different instance and access the same content.

    • @scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      I wish some entrepreneur had instead created an amazing fucking Mastodon instance and put all that marketing and engineering dollar into the platform. But you can’t own Mastodon so you can’t ever sell Mastodon so those types of folks will never invest in Mastodon. We could just say “fuck ‘em” but they have done a serious job of monopolizing the time of all the talented people who know how to make something like this go.

      • @supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        106 months ago

        One is a product with investors selling itself on promises of decentralization (bluesky), the other is a genuine community tool (mastodon) that actually provides decentralization.

      • @prototype_g2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        BlueSky isn’t decentralised yet. Right now the only thing that is decentralized is data storage. You can’t set up an independent federated instance yet. They promise they will add that feature, but it hasn’t happened yet.

  • @paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    386 months ago

    X will likely merge with TruthSocial as the defacto Conservative/Right-wing social media site (named something dumb like “XTruthXSocialX”), while BlueSky will become the defacto Liberal social media site.

      • @meep_launcher@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        76 months ago

        Oh yea, he never turned off his mic. Pretty sure I heard his mom come down with tang and Oreos and he cussed her out

        • Bizzle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          His mom has pretty good tang though 👀👀

    • @psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      86 months ago

      That would be great - much better than the current situation where twitter is run like a right-wing site but still has people from across the political spectrum hanging out there due to inertia.

    • @cable@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      Can you imagine taking X (formerly Twitter) public again with a merger with $DJT? Holy smokes.

        • @cable@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          If anything they’ll be able to do it, as well as bringing up some already half-dead stocks back to life and fuck some hedge funds that thought they hit the jackpot… call it the M&A era of America

  • J_on_Lemmy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    256 months ago

    99% of my Feed on Bluesky was just people saying they’ve left Twitter for Bluesky. No amount of suggest less of this helped.

    • @rozodru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      206 months ago

      happens on every “new” social media platform that is similar to another social media platform. Was all over Lemmy when people were “boycotting” reddit…course most went right back to reddit when the boycotting was over.

        • @bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 months ago

          Morrowind would keep me there but i dont really have much to say about it anyways in terms of posts (that hasnt already been said) so ion need it myself :3

      • @hogmomma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Can’t tell you how many “I’m moving to Google+” posts I saw back in the day. I wonder how that panned out for them…

    • @psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      Haha there is a gigantic wave of people switching over from twitter right now, that’s just what is on people’s minds. The conversation will move on soon enough.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      Just like when Threads launched and or when Reddit made the API changes. You get a flood of new users who want to talk about being new users.

    • @Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      On my feed it’s just pictures of pets and people who I don’t know making lists of things they like. But to be fair, I just installed the app today.

  • @PunchingWood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    256 months ago

    These kind of articles always remind me whenever a new MMORPG launched, and then people claimed it would be the World of Warcraft killer.

    • @brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      On the other hand, the track record of old social networks is not great.

      And it’s reasonable to posit Twitter is deep into the enshitifiication cycle.

      • @PunchingWood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        Depends what “side” you’re on and what content you choose to engage with I guess.

        Because features wise it’s better than ever I’d say, I’m not even sure what stuff they added or removed that would’ve made the platform worse.

        • @brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          I’d posit the algorithm has turned it into a monster.

          Attention should be dictated more by chronological order and what others retweet, not what some black box thinks will keep you glued to the screen, and it felt like more of the former in the old days. This is a subtle, but also very significant change.

      • @PunchingWood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        Most definitely.

        It’s seen better days and current expansion is kinda meh, but it’s still leading the amount of active players by a lot over all other MMO games.

    • JoYo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      06 months ago

      I mean, plenty of other games have had way more concurrent players.

  • @BMTea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    126 months ago

    It needs A) same functionality B) ban all forms of racism, especially Zionism and C) refuse investment from undemocratic nations like GCC or China

      • @BMTea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        They should definitely not allow investment from anyone associated with Trump admin, the Pentagon etc.

      • @Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -106 months ago

        What’s with the consistent amount of “American Democracy is dead” rhetoric I’ve been seeing lately? It’s not like Trump is president yet. And sure, Biden isn’t going to make too much impact as a lame duck, but even after Trump takes office again, there’s a lot he can do, and a whole lot more he won’t be able to. The power is still in the hands of the people, especially at the local level. America’s democracy isn’t dead, and saying anything of the sort is obeying in advance.

        • ඞmir
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Have you seen Project 2025, Trump’s unofficial but kind of official election plan? Republicans have all three branches of government now. They would have to willingly choose to not follow their own proposed plan, and there’s no reason to do that. So, logically, they will execute it - and that’s it. The end of US democracy.

          Go read it or summaries of it if you think it’s hyperbole.

          • @zephorah@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            46 months ago

            It’s not a bullet list or headline so they’re going to continue to ignore all 996 pages of it.

        • @Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          156 months ago

          Yea, have you heard about project 2025?

          With choosing trump, the American people have chosen that they approve that project.

          At least, so do I see it.

        • @zephorah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Oh you sweet summer child.

          A key component of 2016-2020 was Trump was surrounded by people who wouldn’t, including generals who wouldn’t entertain his talk of maybe using nukes. It’s not that he couldn’t in 2016-2020, it’s that he was surrounded by people who wouldn’t and he didn’t know how himself.

          That’s no longer the case. And the people around him have studied up on how.

          One of his first big speeches post win this week, claiming to be about defending 1A, he states he’s going to use/mobilize “my Department of Justice” to prosecute anyone trying to enforce the Hatch Act. The Hatch Act is the thing that keeps polling locations safe and neutral. The Hatch Act prevents the threatening of voters in or within 100yds of polling locations, as well as making the buying of votes illegal. That latter part keeps voting free.

          Think about the possibilities. Think hard. In fact, if you’re a creative type, sit down and write a short story about what that could look like on the present political climate.

          He’s reading a script, the entire speech lacks his usual meandering bullshit. It’s cagey. He totally didn’t write it. The only piece that smells like trump is the piece about no longer being able to ban social media accounts without a court order, probably because that’s personal for him.

          And remember. SCOTUS basically said he can do anything while President without fear of prosecution. It’s simply that Biden is unwilling to go there that we haven’t seen what that looks like yet.

          I don’t read hard left media for this info. I listen to direct talk, from Trump, from his people, and listen to/read interviews with individuals in or very close to the 2016-2020 term. I then find a historian or lawyer who can add nuance. I then read the hive mind of We The People and other countries for more perspective.

    • @zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      136 months ago

      That’s not going to happen here. Am I the only one who watched Trumps speech claiming to be about 1A? He is coming for social media day 1, to reinforce Elon Musk, not only on Twitter, but all other large social media platforms (he doesn’t name FB and Reddit, but he’s talking about FB and Reddit, maybe as far down as Lemmy, BlueSky & Mastadon too, idk).

      He says he’s going to mobilize “my Department of Justice” to do it.

      He specifically says: making account removal/banning only possible via court order, removing moderation, and removing any labels of misinformation or disinformation.

      He’s already threatening YouTube with removal of section 230, if they moderate content.

      Why is no one talking about this?

        • @zephorah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          It’s a YouTube video of his speech. Asmongold has a reaction video as do other people who make their living on YouTube, but the shortest take is the original posted by that dipshit RFK Jr. 6min. Only 234k views, probably because it’s buried on RFK Jrs bullshit. It’s the vid with the giant green crayon all caps subtitles. Idk why they captioned it that way, but, they did.

          https://youtu.be/xJfUXVOoFBo?si=7zP2Et5QGSt5dW20

    • @Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 months ago

      yeah I don’t think a usa based platform is really “long gaming” the fee speech problem. Bluesky now shifting to monetization plans. Its a matter of time until some rich dildo buys it up. If were lucky it will be mark cuban or somebody buts its still grim prospects.

      • @SuperEars@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        “Fee speech” is a serendipitous typo. Or maybe you meant it. First I’ve heard it, anyway.

      • @zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Cuban has deleted much of his anti trump talk, high odds the man is hunkering down.

        Remember, trumps been promising vengeance to “enemies” for well over a year now, and now he has immunity from prosecution.

      • @BMTea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        If I was being honest I’d add “literally anyone whos firm has any connections to a NATO government” but then I’d be called a consoiracy theorist. But as for GCC, that’s a more direct threat to lives of dissidents.

      • @rational_lib@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        296 months ago

        Non-billionaire controlled so far. It’s a public benefit corporation, which is vulnerable to being Altmaned. Once it becomes valuable money will find a way.

        • @psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          That’s where the federated angle comes in. Not quite there yet, but as the network grows the vulnerability to the original node getting taken over by a bad actor lessens.

          • @merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            46 months ago

            A feature that makes it easier for their users to migrate to a competitor? Blockchain Capital invests $15M in BlueSky. Insert that Anakin / Padme meme:

            Anakin: Now that we’ve invested, let’s make that federation feature priority 0
            Padme: As in highest priority, right?
            Anakin:
            Padme: As in highest priority, right?

          • @chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            Is blue sky federated? I thought it was another closed garden. If slightly more open than Twitter.

            • @psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              46 months ago

              Bluesky grew out of a project at twitter whose goal was to create a federated protocol. Then when they were split off from twitter when Musk took over they had to start their own twitter-style platform to be the first player in that federated protocol. Now that that part is running they’re gradually building out the originally planned system of allowing more servers to be part of the federation: https://docs.bsky.app/docs/advanced-guides/federation-architecture

      • @portuga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        No. Just the same shit with less users. Let it grow (by the millions as lemmy is trying to convince us) and you’ll see. I say we get back to smoke signals

    • capital
      link
      fedilink
      English
      126 months ago

      Looking like it’s about time lmgtfy to make a comeback.