• @njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Also, the worst hemmeroids ever and a special CEO diet consisting of nothing but exlax and habanero peppers.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even the founder of Costco (only stepped down as CEO a few years ago), a company famous both for how well it treats its customers, and its workforce?

      • @GhostFence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Eh, cancer is no joke. It doesn’t discriminate on who it hits. I wouldn’t wish that on anyone, even though I would snicker if these CEOs get hit by lightning lol

        • @Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          Ah fuck it, was going to be cryptic but ill just tell the story.

          I worked for Duke university and one of the people in our department had stomach cancer. The head of the department, provost, CEO and president sent out emails asking if anyone would donate their leave for the person in their hospital being treated for cancer. If the person didn’t get the days then they were going to drop them from the company insurance It was bad so the person had to stay in the hospital.

          I hope they all get the most the worse form of cancer and slowly die with no family around. If there is a hell, they deserve it.

    • @the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly, they’re probably thrilled. Legislation forced them to provide a free product for this sort of simple, no frills filing, so they won’t be losimg any paying customers to this and probably won’t have to spend dev and qa time supporting the free tier anymore

  • GodlessCommie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    761 year ago

    Free if you have no other exemptions to file.

    1099? Nope Depreciation? Nope Tax credits? Nope

    Makes for a great headline though.

    Im sure those of us that do have exemptions other than the standard will see our tax prep fees skyrocket

    • Stern
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 year ago

      Some progress is better then no progress, and TurboTax et. al. losing in any way is a victory for the rest of us.

    • thermal_shock
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      are you not capable of taking a win? it’s a HUGE step towards disassembling predatory cpas and tax software.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        it’s a HUGE step towards disassembling predatory cpas and tax software.

        Its a regular sized step, as its targeted primarily at simple filers. But the cutoff is incredibly low. You can’t use it if you’ve got retirement savings through an IRA, if you’ve got deductions for college expenses, or if you’re claiming the child care deduction. I’d wager that’s at least half the people who bother to file returns.

        Definitely good news for folks that H&R Block likes to fleece - anyone collecting EITC or Child Tax Credits and not much else. But hardly universal.

        • thermal_shock
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          do you think it won’t eventually add that stuff? pretty naive to just “meh” and basically call it a failure. nothing happens overnight.

          • @frog_brawler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s not a “failure” but I wouldn’t call it a huge win either. It’s a small victory with a tiny horn to toot.

            IIRC there was a free version of Turbo Tax that did the same thing years ago… so we’re catching up to the old free version now.

    • @meyotch@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      Maybe not. You will have the same number of tax preparers chasing less work. Through the magic of the Free Market™️, shouldn’t that mean pressure to reduce prices? We can only hope.

    • irotsoma
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      Yeah, very limited, but it’s very good for more than half of the population that don’t have enough deductions to exceed the standard and don’t own property (if you properly count houseless “households” that earn income as not owning property and not just renters like most statistics). It’s dumb that they have to file a return anyway just to acres money that never should have been collected. Most just don’t know how to properly file their W-4 to not have taxes withheld in the first place. Mostly because they follow the directions and/or are afraid of paying a fine plus interest.

      Anyway, it’s a step in the right direction. And if we can unbury all of the staff out of the pile of paper returns, we can devote some to go after the rich and their frivolous, often fraudulent deductions and have them pay the tax they owe.

      • @Preflight_Tomato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Most just don’t know how to properly file their W-4 to not have taxes withheld in the first place.

        How do you do this? How do you calculate what to personally withhold and pay? Is it simply calculating through the income tax?

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There’s a worksheet that usually comes with it where you answer questions about your living situation - single/married, homeowner/renter, how many kids, etc. - and it gives you a number to put in. It’s pretty accurate. I’ve done it at every job and aside from years with tax credits I’ve never gotten back more than a few hundred bucks.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        I’ve had 1099s and tax credits and I’ve never sent in a paper return. I keep the records in case of an audit but it’s not like e-file hasn’t existed forever.

        • irotsoma
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          But it hasn’t always been free to file electronically. The government made it required for them to offer free versions for simple returns, but that was recent.

          Also, access to the Internet isn’t universal. You’d be surprised how much of the US doesn’t have affordable Internet and a fair number don’t have Internet available at all, or limited to just dialup which is not very useful. And a lot of apps don’t work right on phone browsers, especially older phones, so then you need a desktop or laptop which a lot of people don’t have. Some have access in libraries, but a lot don’t or traveling to a library is a burden. And lots of other reasons that internet isn’t a given for a large portion of households. So paper is still not just necessary, but the easiest way.

    • @bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I would suggest you get hired by the IRS and start rewriting all their ancient code to build in and allow every deduction rule and that it’s applied correctly every time so everyone can use it.

      The tax laws are so large and so complex and the code running all this stuff is so old and now locked in because they didn’t keep up with updating their software as they went along. I’m amazed they got this far. Oh, and like you, I can’t use it either. But that’s why I have an accountant.

  • KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    731 year ago

    why isn’t this constitutionally protected.

    Can we pass an amendment for this shit? It’s actually kind of fucked up.

      • @skullone@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        Sorta silly?! It’s fucked beyond belief. Source: me, someone who profits off the healthcare industry as a corpo. Sorry 🤷.

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          god if i had the arcane knowledge of the entire field of healthcare, i would do some unbelievably fucked up shit.

          And by that i mean writing open documentation that is continually maintained and represents most healthcare providers in the US specifically to fuck up their entire existence.

          • @skullone@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Doo iiiiit! (If you can).

            Honestly I do the best I can to fudge numbers and drive down prices, but I can only do so much. They’re eventually going to catch on and replace me with someone who doesn’t give a fuck.

            • KillingTimeItself
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              lol, perhaps one of these days i will have enough expendable income and time to dedicate to this kind of shit.

              It’d make for a rather fun experience.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        i mean, it is sorta silly. Not full sillyness, full sillyness would be forcing people in immediate life threatening injury to recite the ABC’s backwards before operation as protocol.

    • @JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      291 year ago

      I think that some companies like turbotax are employing lobbyists to make impossible filing for taxes unless you go through a gatekeeper

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        yep, which is why its weird that we don’t have a legally protected avenue of direct filing.

    • @GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I have a couple of other constitutional amendments I’d like to advance before this.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        idk man i think i disagree honestly.

        Tax is one of the very few constants that we all have to legally deal with, aside from like, auto insurance.

    • @PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1591 year ago

      Doubt there is one. The hard truth is that most Americans’ taxes are pretty simple and straightforward. We can stop pretending that copying some boxes from a W2 and a 1099 is difficult.

      I mean, personally I wish we’d stop pretending that the IRS isn’t already fully aware of what you owe and could just do the filling for you, like in other countries, but until Grover Norquist fucks off forever we’re stuck where we are.

      • @kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        471 year ago

        Right. Filing taxes should only be necessary if you have itemized writeoffs or wish to contest the IRS’s statement of your tax liability. They already know what you earned their your employer, what’s been paid in taxes, what basic credits your qualify for, etc. They know what you owe so long as you didn’t have expenses to apply for that they couldn’t assume or know about. The only reason they don’t already do that or, at least until now, have a free public system for filing, it’s because tax companies have lobbied for decades to be able to milk the public for cash to help them file and navigate their tax liability.

        • @brbposting@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          181 year ago

          The argument has been since free filing means only the wealthy will hire accountants, free filing would discriminate against the poor given a few mistakes will be made here and there.

          I may not need to mention that disingenuous argument is made by the pirates at Intuit and their lobbyists.

          • @PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            181 year ago

            free filing would discriminate against the poor

            As opposed to the current system where the richest among us can hire a whole team of accountants to find every deduction possible?

              • @kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                61 year ago

                It should also be noted that if the vast majority of people do nothing special on their taxes and just accept the government’s assessment, then that leaves a much smaller group of people to be audited. And a much larger portion of those people will be those who are trying to weasel their way out of paying their share. Right now, with the IRS being criminally underfunded, they only focus on low hanging fruit, the small fries. With those people being boiler plater auto-accepting tax payers, that would mean the IRS has no reason to audit them and can focus on the big boys where the real cheats are. That’s another big reason we do not have that sort of system and why the IRS is currently so underfunded (despite every dollar spent on the IRS generating between 5 and 9 dollars in revenue from tax fraud/evasion). Those kinds of people pay to make sure it doesn’t happen.

          • @pdxfed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Holy Christ someone using disingenuous appropriately, I’d almost given up on the word. Thanks for saving it!

        • @Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I understand why we do out taxes in the current situation, kinda. If the irs just sent you a bill it would be ripe for people thinking they were getting ripped off. People hating taxes and thinking they’re getting robbed is about as American as it gets. The whole boston tea party thing. People on both side doing the math holds people accountable. Also the current tax bracket situation kinda needs some end of the year math. Now, if it was a flat tax, a fixed percent… THAT EVERYONE pays no matter how much you make then it would be easy math. But they gotta make sure the middle class is paying 22% of their income to the feds and the billionaires pay one tenth of a percent… you know… for reasons. Then there are a billion write-offs and loopholes the rich can exploit, so they gotta keep those there.

          If it was, say, 5% for everyone, no matter what you make, then it could easily just come out of your check as you get paid with no bs at the end of the year.

          • @kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            A flat tax is a poor tax. 5% of your income means WAAAAY more to someone working minimum wage with two kids than someone who has a second home, even if dollars and cents it’s way less. And the wealthy will evade a flat tax as much as they already do a progressive tax.

      • @Delta_44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        In italy the data is pre-filled, you just have to check if there’s something missing and you’re good to go, but you still have to send the module manually, like going into the website and doing the stuff.

        It should be all automatic, wtf

        • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Don’t they just assume that everything is good if you don’t reply? Works that way here

          • @Delta_44@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            It’s not a “reply”, it’s a thing that you have to do, so that if you owe the government something you’d pay it, elsa you’ll receive money if the government owes you something (for example, a percentage of medical expenses gets “refunded”)

            • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Here if you owe something you’ll get basically billed for it and if you are owed they just inform you about it and pay it to your account. If you are owed or you’re even then you don’t have to do a thing. No confirmation, nothing to do, you can ignore the whole thing. Is it the same for you guys?

      • GodlessCommie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        most Americans’ taxes are pretty simple and straightforward

        Once the reporting for income over $600 from shit like eBay sales, Venmo, etc kicks in, the 1099 they issue would make free filing ineligible

      • @adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        step one for me is get out last year’s so i have a point of reference. just do the same thing again. numbers are a bit different, but the general ‘what-goes-where’ is usually the same–unless they split a form into multiple pages, or add an extra page to one.

        once i get the new blank forms printed, it’s about 15 minutes for me to fill-out, copy, and stuff inside an envelope. this year’s added yet another sheet, i had to use a flat instead of the usual #10. cost more to mail, too, but i will not ever ‘e-file’.

        one of the few perks of being poor—easy taxes.

        • @PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 year ago

          You’re acting like the filing that would come from the government would be the final record and you wouldn’t be allowed to correct it, which is not at all what people are suggesting.

          Plus, audits will still be a thing.

        • @Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          All of those things you mentioned are edge cases which you would still be able to handle yourself if they auto filled everything for you.

          I use an online tax service which scans my w2 and filles it out. It still gives me the option to edit stuff but I mostly just check to make sure things look good.

    • @catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 year ago

      Unless it’s changed from the pilot, it’s only useful if you file a 1040EZ or take some really basic deductions. Anything beyond the basics, like any kind of investments, means you need to use a different tool.

      But freetaxusa is still free for all but the most complex cases.

      • @triptrapper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        From the article:

        The pilot program targeted people with simple tax returns based on W-2 forms. In her remarks today Yellen said that over the next few years they will expand Direct File to support more situations.

      • @TeddE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        But even that would cover a large percentage of the American workforce, and I imagine over a few years, it will grow to cover all users that don’t need personal accountants. Progress is progress.

        Personally, I hope this transitions into a system where they email you a proposed return and you do nothing to accept it (only needing to take action if there’s an issue).

    • @Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Only catch is Republicans probably launching some type of legal action to try and stop it.

      https://www.nysscpa.org/news/publications/the-trusted-professional/article/13-republican-ags-seek-to-stop-irs-s-fre-direct-file-pilot-program-020224

      No lawsuit launched yet to my knowledge, just sternly worded letters saying please stop helping taxpayers instead of letting predatory companies like Intuit fleece money off of them.

      I would expect them to try something soon though with this announced.

    • @apex32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I was in a pilot state (Arizona), and I looked into it. It’s only for federal taxes. You need to file state taxes separately.

      There are already several online tax solutions that offer free federal and charge for state.

      • @Lyrl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Does Arizona not have an online free system? Illinois has a very hand-holding guided set of questions and has for years, it’s always been our federal taxes that make my head hurt to fill out via the IRS’s FreeFillableForms site.

    • @Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Huh, I went to check - we did it in 2003 (for vat and income tax iirc, ofc they expended it since, nowdays only courtroom stuff doesn’t have online admin systems).

      Prior to that you just got the (already filled out) income tax form in the mail - if everything was ok that was usually it. In case you still owed, it included the bill, it they owed you they wired the money to your bank.

      If the tax forms were incomplete for some reason (or just not optimised between the members of the same family) you could fill in what they missed (like literally with a pen) & send it back (for them to verify & return it to youb revised).

      (This system still works so folk who prefer to do it via paper can do that.)

  • @shimura@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 year ago

    Mine was too complicated to file for free because I have retirement investments? Seems like a silly reason to force someone to use a paid service.

  • vortic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    Even without access to Direct File since I wasn’t in a pilot state, I’ve been using the IRS’ “Free Fillable Forms” for the last few years and they’ve worked great! They don’t hold your hand as much as the paid software but for my returns they’ve been more than adequate and free!

    Does anyone know how “Direct File” differs from the “Free Fillable Forms”? Does it hold your hand a little more and help you find credits/deductions? Free Fillable Forms worked well, but only so long as I knew what I needed to file. New circumstances, like adding a dependent, lead to a lot of research.

    • @punkaccountant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Yes, direct file is guided with a checklist. However there are only certain situations where a taxpayer would qualify for direct file - there’s income limitations and only certain income types qualify (u would not be able to use it if u are self-employed or own rental properties for example). The IRS is planning to expand this but for now it’s limited tho the vast majority of taxpayers would qualify.

      Anyone can use the free fillable forms but u either have to know what you’re doing or be comfortable reading irs form instructions if you have a more complex tax situation.

  • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Now if we could do like other countries and just have the government send a pre formatted document of things like wages, dependents, and other taxable items so we all know what we owe because the government has all that information already. Add what you need as far as write offs or other income and send it back. Done. None of this collection of tons of different forms, figuring out what percent you can write off, etc. and submitting it all hoping you don’t get it wrong and get audited or owe fines and interest.

  • @Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    As a tax accountant, I sincerely hope this gets to a point where a vast majority of the population has no need for my services.

    I used to play in the big leagues where none of my clients would ever qualify for this and their returns routinely took upwards of a hundred hours to complete. Those guys need to keep paying.

    Now I play down in the minors a couple steps above the Block, and I hate seeing the owner sell these three or four hundred dollar returns that might take me an hour to complete in the first year and maybe thirty minutes in subsequent years.

      • @Got_Bent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Mutual disdain was the catalyst. I did it for eight years and probably lost fifteen years of life expectancy from it. Ungodly toxic environment. Fuck big firm accounting. Fuck them all in the most demeaning, painful way imaginable.

        I make roughly one third the money today, and I’m much happier for it. I still make a comfortable living where I don’t particularly worry about money, so what would the additional two thirds do for me outside paying medical bills it causes?

        No matter how much I try to remove my name from searches, I still get recruited by ambitious young people on a regular basis. I generally make them stop with a response that goes something like this:

        I would rather have my eyes gouged out by the white hot barbed penis of Satan himself while he spits in my mouth than return to public accounting for any amount of money.