• Thomas
    link
    fedilink
    441 year ago

    ArchLinux’s pacman with ILoveCandy option enabled.

    • @Goun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      I use apt-get, I don’t care about how “pleasing” the package manager is, I just want it to do its job and get off the way… But pacman… I don’t know why, but it’s so beautiful, charming and cute, how do they do it?

      • @t0mri@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        exactly. They use c and C (uppercase) alternatively, making it look like pacman is eating. hence the beautiful, charming, and cute progress indicator

        btw dont think im crazy but ive set max parallel downloads to 200 and when i do a system update, damn that looks so good.

      • Ephera
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I don’t care how visually pleasing it is either, but I often find apt(-get) difficult to read.

        For example, a simple thing that zypper does, is that when listing the packages to be installed, it colors the first letter of each package, which makes it a lot easier to scan through the packages.

  • @frozencow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nix with nix-output-monitor (nom). https://github.com/maralorn/nix-output-monitor

    It shows the tree of packages to download and to build. It shortens the tree in realtime when packages have finished downloading/building and lengthens the tree when it finds more packages it needs to handle. Very fun and satisfying.

    I haven’t seen this in other package managers.

  • Ryan
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    I really like emerge/portage, even w/out the “candy” feature enabled. Great color highlighting, and verbose messages about any config change(s) needed.

    • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Portage remains to this day my favorite cli. It’s nice to look at and provides all the info I want.

      It’s the one thing I miss from gentoo…

        • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          “waves vaguely”

          Portage was great but losing a day whenever there was a glibc upgrade or something that caused a more “exciting” upgrade than usual wasn’t worth it. I wanted more stability after a while.

          • @poinck@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I can’t remember ever having a glibc related update problem. eselect news is always there for me. (:

            I only have rarely a perl update related problem, but usually solvable with a world update. And since there are now binpkgs I only compile what has differing useflags from the selected profile. Portage has never been better!

    • @Goun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Ohh it’s been a long time since I last used gentoo! I remember I used to love the green/blue (I hope my memory isn’t failing me) combination everywhere </3.

      I stopped using it because building the updates on multiple machines was becoming a pain and had a couple of drives fail, but those were good times!

  • @catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Package managers don’t have visuals. What do apt (dpkg) and rpm look like?

  • @BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    I really like the simplicity and formatting of stock pacman. It’s not super colorful but it’s fast and gives you all of the info you need. yay (or paru if you’re a hipster) is the icing on top.

  • @RustyNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    Either flatpak or NixOs for me.

    Flatpak is just light and doesn’t flood the user with 720710 lines just to say “installing Firefox”

    NixOs just straight up has nothing to show.

    • Sips'OP
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Fair enough, visually pleasing is subjective, after all. Simplicity can be the best sometimes :=)

  • Lissa
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Package managers are for chumps. Build everything from source and track where you installed it in a single master text file.

      • Lissa
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        The key is to do it manually. Reject modernity. Embrace reinvention of not just the wheel.

      • Lissa
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Nah, the trick is to, at random, leave a package out of the text file so the system isn’t truly managed and all is chaos!