• Pyr
    link
    fedilink
    921 year ago

    Stupid shape for a can too, tips over In a vehicles cup holder

      • Psychadelligoat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        You sure about that?

        Cylinders of the same volume will have the same area, so it should be the same amount of aluminum?

        Maybe less, even, since the lid and bottom are thicker than the sides and on the taller can there’s less of that thick top/bottom

        • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          That can’t be true.

          Consider a cylinder cut in half, giving a circular cross section. Cover each new circular gap with new aluminum.

          Now you’ve enclosed the same volume in cylinders, with a different surface area.

          • Psychadelligoat
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            You also created 2 cylinders where once there was one, which is not what was being discussed. You even mention that you added material:

            Cover each new circular gap with new aluminum

            I could have said “2 cylinders of the same volume” but I felt context made that clear

            • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              Yes I did say that I added material. That’s the point: you cannot do this transformation without adding material.

              But you’re saying this is only with two cylinders?

        • Jorn
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ignore things like the bevel, wall thickness, etc. Just calculating for a basic right cylinder, you can see how the surface area changes for different heights with a constant volume. I’ve outlined the standard dimensions of a can(inches). https://youtu.be/gL3HxBQyeg0

          • Psychadelligoat
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            I had a feeling it’d math out something like that if I opened my fat mouth, lol

            I do wonder if thickness of the walls or lid/bottom does have an effect, though, as there must be some reason they make these weird ass cans

  • @Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    671 year ago

    …do people think the tall can is bigger? If anything, I’ve always assumed that they were smaller 🤷‍♂️

      • @moistclump@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        261 year ago

        In my highschool psych class we actually went to an elementary school and did this experiment with the kiddos. It was a while ago but if I recall correctly, 9/10 times they thought tall = bigger. I bet some people never grow out of that mindset or at least at first glance our less smart brain goes “tall is big!”

        • The Picard ManeuverM
          link
          fedilink
          221 year ago

          I guarantee these big corporations have psych majors working in their marketing teams and it’s 100% intentional.

          • @moistclump@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            Oh for sure, it’s definitely a whole wing of the organization. People are the ones who spend money, so if you want more money, study and exploit the people who spend it.

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      They do have a larger surface area for the same volume…

    • @aulin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Same. They look like the small 25 cl energy drink cans, so even if they’re still 33 cl, they look smaller.

  • @fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    521 year ago

    That’s a 2.24x price increase. That’s even beyond Argentina-hyperinflation levels of increase. Are we sure this is an apples-to-apples comparison? Like, was there a sale or bulk discount that made the shorter can relatively cheaper? I’m struggling to believe a retailer would engage in such a brazen markup in a single week. (Not to say it’s not possible, but it’s extreme enough that I’m not taking the word of some random hand-written graphic on the Internet.)

    • @Sestren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      241 year ago

      I mean… I’ll regularly go to the grocery store and see soda prices vary by 200-300% week-to-week. Sure, it’s all based around “sale” value, but it amounts to the same thing. If it’s $9 for 2 12-packs one week and then $11 for a 12-pack the next week, it isn’t an invalid markup because you had to buy 2 to get the first price.

    • @Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I’m more inclined to blame the manufacturer for the price increase (in this case Coke) as opposed to the retailer. Especially in this case, I kinda doubt a company as large as Coke would allow retailers to stray from the price they want by more that a few cents.

    • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      It probably costs more to distribute the new can shape since our entire civilization’s can infrastructure is built around a standard can.

    • @WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not an apples to apples comparison. This was a reddit post made by someone who went out of their way to buy things for different amounts to make ragebait.

      It’s a dumb post and it is safe to ignore it. Sadly someone reposted it here.

  • @Zess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    341 year ago

    Fuck corporations but I don’t believe this for a second. People are just making this shit up now. Some dude scribbles some prices on a piece of paper and this whole website loses its mind.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I was going to say… who the fuck was paying $1.06/can for Coke to begin with? Hell, I saw one of those 32oz Big Gulp cups selling for $4 less than a week ago.

      This all just looks made up and hysterical, because Americans cannot handle not having their sugary treats.

  • @darn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 year ago

    if you’re buying coke in america, you should get the 12 packs at grocery stores instead. it’s anywhere between $5.99 to $8.99, which is less than a dollar per can

    • @Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      That’s fucking crazy. I stopped buying soda pre-covid, but I regularly got 4 12packs for $2.99 each up until at least 2019.

    • voxel
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      most people are getting cans like that in a pinch tho, if you want a lot of cola, regular 2 liter plastic bottles (or even better, 6-packs of 1.5/2l) are a much better deal

    • @force@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Or get the 2L bottles, which are usually around the same price as the 500 mL bottles (for some reason).

    • @HeyJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Not on sale? Where I am, I only see the $7 price when it’s on sale and you have to buy 3. So it’s 2 for $10 and get one free. Without that the normal price is about $10. The best sales that come around during big holidays only are buy 2 get 2 free, which brings it down to $5.

  • @computerscientistI@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    Maybe you want to have a cup of tea instead? Way more cheap and healthy. Or buy some off-brand soda. It is just as much garbage as coca cola but at least it’s cheap.

  • Soda is such a fucking profitable scam because it’s mostly water and that resource is mostly free. The syrup and carbonation should be pennies compared to what it actually sells for.

      • @WallEx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        Here in Germany they can extract millions of liters for a symbolic euro, that is basically free and also far from a third world country. Coke has enough power to get through with this.

      • @0xb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        Don’t know the situation in america so what you say may be true, but on some countries (developing ones where the power of the state is diminished) water is not free for everybody else, but multinational corporations get almost unlimited use concessions for their bottlers for a laughably low fee if any, drying out the area and sometimes literally leaving towns or regions with no public water left for other uses, forcing the people to have to pay for other sources. I don’t live in a place in that situation yet, but some other regions in my country are going exactly through that. In some cases, those beverages are for the american market.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          It probably not that cheap anywhere in the U.S., but on the other hand, they probably get enough tax breaks to make up for it.

  • @MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    As long as I stay mad at “those damn libs” then companies can raise prices with impunity. If nobody boycotts these innocent companies then stock prices will be able to surge.

    Honestly though, I wish people understood that by blaming only inflation they’re effectively giving companies a blank check to keep raising prices. Sigh.

  • Nick
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    It’s usually very small, but here, prices must also show how much 100g/100ml of something costs

    • @perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Then you get shops like M&S where all the expensive varieties of (for example) tomato are £/kg and the cheap ones are £/unit so you can’t see the big price gap.

    • @ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Where is “here” approximately?

      In the U.S. retailers are notorious for having the “unit” price of similar items being listed as (for example) $1.57/oz in one case and $2.23/count in another.

      • @fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        At least in California in grocery stores they always have a per weight tag too. Problem is that it’s not always the same weight…

      • GHOSCHT
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Not sure where that commenter is from, but it’s the case for Germany. Pretty useful to compare

      • ChihuahuaOfDoom
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Exactly this, they will put $/oz next to $/unit next to $/lb. It’s infuriating but I still take the time to do the math.

      • Nick
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Well, since my instance is local I can just as well say that it’s Switzerland. Apparently it’s mandatory to label proces in a specific way. So far, I’ve never encountered the case that I wasn’t able to compare those prices between products of the same category.

  • @protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Y’all, remember this is sugar water and even at $1.06 there’s a significant profit margin.

      • Troy
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Depends on the country. Corn syrup in everything is a distinctly American phenomenon

        • @GluWu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          If you look at the picture you might be able to tell where it was taken. There are some pretty good hints.

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Yeah, it certainly doesn’t seem like their production costs would increase much from inflation…

  • @AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They “proved” the trick works by a couple years back, releasing some different flavors in that shape can. Too many of us paid the premium to get the different flavor, even knowing it’s just manufactured scarcity. I still miss the blueberry-acai Diet Coke. Maybe they came away with “weirdly shaped cans sell at bigger profit”