• @dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    891 year ago

    It’s grifting, pure and simple. All those things may be possible but Sam Altman is spewing this line of bullshit to keep the venture capital flowing into his company.

    • @DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 year ago

      Exactly. As a SW engineer, I don’t know how far we are from an AGI exactly, but I am confident enough Altman and openAi have no idea where to even start.

      • @EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        As a software engineer that works in AI, the “breakthrough” we’ve made is in proving that LLM’s can perform well at scale, and that hallucinations aren’t as big a problem as initially thought. Most tech companies didn’t do what OpenAI did because hallucinations are brand-damaging, whereas OpenAI didn’t give a fuck. In the next few years, all existing AI systems will be through LLM’s, and probably as good at ChatGPT.

        We might make more progress now that researchers and academics see the value in LLM’s, but my weakly held opinion is that it’s mostly surrounded by hype.

        We’re nowhere near what most would call AGI, although to be blunt, I don’t think the average person on here could truly tell you what that looks like without disagreeing with AI researchers.

  • juiceclaws
    link
    fedilink
    English
    561 year ago

    The current state of capitalism will ensure the second line never sees the light of day

    • @erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      We can already create enough abondance that no human starves, sleep outside or can’t affotd medical treatment. Still look at the world.

      • Karyoplasma
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Why bother to let humans live if they are not profitable enough for the megacorps? That almost sounds like work.

  • @yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    441 year ago

    Abundance is already here, tons of food are destroyed and thrown out when they accidentally make too much while people are starving, there’s no money in abundance, it’s the artificial lack of supply that keeps prices high and profits soaring.

    • @Llewellyn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Food isn’t the only resource in the equation. Most of the resources are limited and even diminishing.

      • silly goose meekah
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I agree but I think their point was more along the lines of “Even if we have complete abundance of everything (as in, the capabilities to produce anything in abundance), capitalists will continue to create artificial lack of supply to continue profiting off of the workers. For example, look at the food abundance we have”

        • @Llewellyn@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          capitalists will continue to create artificial lack of supply

          I think it’s not that, but just:

          capitalists won’t spend their money to create logistical chains for free.

          “Collect and distribute supply” won’t do itself, someone should do that. And noone will do that for free

  • @xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The first paragraph? Can’t say I disagree.

    Second paragraph? Delusional. Or actively deceitful. Given Altman’s background, I’m leaning toward the second.

  • @Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 year ago

    An issue with this tweet is that we already have the capacity to do a lot. We have the technology to provide healthy and diverse diets for the entire planet and fit a cities worth of farming inside a few city blocks (vertical hydroponics/aeroponics). We have the ability to create electricity in a dozen different renewable ways. We have the ability to desalinate water creating nearly infinite fresh water, we have enough square footage in the world to easily house everyone. We have stellar education systems that we could hand out to the entire world.

    Why don’t we do it? Well, all these things cost money. But the issue is, there also exists staggering amounts of money across the world. The panama papers revealed just a fraction of the wealth being hoarded by just a fraction of the wealthiest people in the world (and most implicated in the panema papers weren’t even too crazy, like soccer stars and business owners). There’s exists tens to hundreds of trillions of dollars of wealth created by the world just floating around in billionaires bank accounts and in the coffers of world powers.

    So it’s not an issue of abundance coming in the near future, we have it here on earth right now.

    • @misspacfic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      exactly.

      many of the mundane atrocities being committed every day are deliberate choices in service of capital rather than people.

      you know, health insurance companies, etc.

    • @DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Well, I am convinced we currently have no idea how an AGI could be made. It shouldn’t be a HW issue since it is possible to have a human brain worth of computing power in a small cluster. So it could be near impossible or we may be one great shower thought away, there is no way to know.

  • @iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    If we means the human race, it’s absolutely true. There’s just no mention of a timeline.

  • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago

    Sure. Just need to get a bunch of trillions hoarded away by billionaires and throw it at R&D to solve these problems and I bet it would happen.

    These rich fuckers making proclamations like that yet somehow still expecting someone else to pay for the solutions.

  • @Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    It’s delusional. The problems we have are not caused by lack of technology and cannot be solved by new technology.