• @cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1011 year ago

    I don’t need or want any of that AI crap in my browser. Hopefully there will be a compiler flag to disable it.

    • @hendrik@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      81
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For what it’s worth… I think there are useful AI tools. For example the offline translation feature that doesn’t send your content to google is something they recently introduced. I’d also like to see someone compete with a decent and open text-to-speech solution that gets wide adoption… And the idea of flagging fake reviews doesn’t sound too bad (I haven’t tried it.) I mean people are complaining about SEO making google unusable and fake news only ever getting more. I can see some benefit there - if done right.

      But we definitely don’t need a Clippy 2.0 or another smart assistant. And I don’t think everything has to be embedded in a browser and make it yet more complicated and bigger, or implemented in the operating system. An add-on will probably do.

      (Edit: And I sometimes don’t understand Mozilla. Why not focus on their core product and make that exceptionally great? If they’re already struggling… What’s with all these side-projects and dabbling in AI anyways?)

      • m-p{3}
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        One feature that could be neat is having a locally-generated summary of a page, as well as suggested tags when bookmarking.

        • @rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Uh yeah, I’m not sure. I’ve tried summarizing with AI tools. And there is the bot here on Lemmy that summarizes stuff… I never liked any of that. It’s really a mixed bag, from pretty okay summaries to entirely missing the point of the original article to bordering on false information. I think we’re far from there yet. However, it’s a common use-case for AI. Maybe in 1-2 years I can stop being afraid of misinformation being fed to me. Currently, I think the incorrectness of the information still outweighs any potential benefit. The more complicated it gets, thus making you in need of a summary in the first place, the more biased and skewed the results get. So I don’t see that happen in the very near future. But we definitely should keep up doing the research and pushing that.

          Tagging and organizing is something I’d like an AI for.

          • pizzaboi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Imagine spending hours writing and editing something with care only for an LLM to “summarize“ it, completely missing any nuance or sarcasm, removing any creative bits or humor, while also making the wrong point altogether. To top it off anyone unwilling to read your story, their time is valuable after all (but not yours, apparently), will now repeat the LLM’s interpretation to anyone they’d like, whether it’s accurate or not.

            It’s an abysmal direction to go for misinformation and even more abysmal for writers. Good content becomes irrelevant and people become less and less willing to pay for a writer’s time and expertise. Why not write with an LLM if a large percentage of your readers summarize the piece with an LLM anyways? Just need more eyeballs to justify our Google Ads spending.

            Built into a “private” browser or not, it’s just another nail in the coffin of a web built by and for humans.

            • @rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              I think you’re completely right with that assessment. Journalist used to be a reputable profession. And explaining things and processing raw information into something that can be consumed by the reader, deemed important. Especially getting it right. There is a whole process to it if you do it professionally. And curating content and deciding what is significant and gets an audience is equally as important.

              Doing away with all of that is like replacing your New York Times with your 5-year-old and whatever she took from watching the news.

    • @e8d79@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      I am very skeptical when it comes to machine learning and all the hype surrounding it, but it’s not all bad. For example an improved firefox translate would be a nice feature to have. There might also be some usecases for accessibility or adblocking.

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I’m sure there’ll be some little forked version of Firefox without the features you can’t abide simply turning off in the settings.

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    611 year ago

    Focusing on FF: Yay!

    Adding AI to FF: NOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooo!

  • matlag
    link
    fedilink
    581 year ago

    Mozilla downsizes as it refocuses on Firefox and AI drops multiple products and layoff 60 so that its current budget can accomodate the stratospheric compensation of its new CEO.

    • @LemmyHead@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Actually I think AI in browser could potentially become a much more effective content blocker than ad blockers like ublock in the future.

      • Madis
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I recall there being at least one content blocker that worked by heuristics instead of rulesets. Cannot remember the name, but it was clearly not as effective as conventional ones, because not all ads look the same and usually people want to block the invisible trackers as well.

    • @slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      She spent 2 yrs at McK 20+ yrs ago - hardly a personality-defining milestone, given how a lot of business students start their career in consulting.

      • @anachronist@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean that’s pretty standard for a McKinsey ghoul:

        • Step 1: go to an ivy league college, get a business degree
        • Step 2: work for McKinsey for a few years as an associate
        • Step 3: get a job at a McKinsey client leapfrogging everyone else into management/c-suite
        • Step 4: hire McKinsey to bring their arrogant children into your org and screw things up

        Everything about her subsequent career has been going from one upper management/c-suite role in a tech company to another. This is not the resume of a person who should be running a nonprofit that controls the most important open source project on the internet. But beyond that just look at what she’s done in her one month at Mozilla:

          1. Massive round of layoffs
          1. “Focus on {buzzword}” where {buzzword} in this case is AI

        That’s straight out of the McKinsey playbook.

  • 🦊 OneRedFox 🦊
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    Specifically, Mozilla plans to scale back its investment in a number of products, including its VPN, Relay and, somewhat remarkably, its Online Footprint Scrubber

    IMO these were their best products. 🙁

    Going forward, the company said in an internal memo, Mozilla will focus on bringing “trustworthy AI into Firefox.” To do so, it will bring together the teams that work on Pocket, Content and AI/Ml.

    Ugh, god damn it.

    • @pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I would assume they’re taking a hard look at revenue figures. I currently do use their VPN, but my impression is that it isn’t much more than a repackaging of Mullvad VPN. No idea about the other products. Is their Relay and Scrubber offering more outstanding?

  • @sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Specifically, Mozilla plans to scale back its investment in a number of products, including its VPN, Relay and, somewhat remarkably, its Online Footprint Scrubber, which launched only a week ago.

    I just purchased an annual plan for Monitor, partially to help Mozilla. I guess this is my thanks

  • BoofStroke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Let’s skip the AI and give thunderbird some love instead. Then again, it’s pretty feature complete as is. Just keep it up to date to keep running and secure.

  • @feoh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    Kinda disappointing how much of the community just takes a giant 💩 on Mozilla whatever it does these days. Funding open source is super crazy hard folks. Notice that the really successful well funded projects are fueled by megacorps?

    Offering constructive criticism is great but if you don’t have better ideas around how to fund an open browser without selling your soul to GOOG or MSFT then perhaps your energy might be better spent elsewhere.

    • @Fungah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -11 year ago

      Train ai to I filtrate Google and kill sundar prichai.

      It won’t help anyone’s bottom line but then at least sundar prichai would be dead.